Split (1)

train · 5.08k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

thread_id stringlengths 37 43	source_file stringlengths 35 37	subject stringlengths 0 231 ⌀	messages stringlengths 88 34.9k	message_count int64 1 42
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032461.txt_22361	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032461.txt	Re: update	[{"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 12:32", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Gentlemen\nI hope you are having a great week.\nIn LA hoping to begin acquiring pieces: are we on?\nIf not yet, when please\nthanks"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey\nHappy to talk to you almost anytime today until around 3PM. Just tell me what number I should reach.\nNot sure what got lost in translation here: never had the intention to go to any art fair or art show or anything of the kind.\nAll the artists we have in mind or send to you are people we have direct connections with. Not just their studio, but also their home. They are people the work of whom we follow, and many of them are already friendly (Arianna, Cali have had dinner or stayed home).\nThe idea is absolutely to have an impact on the ecosystem and to make a difference by supporting great artists when they need it.\nGalleries references are important, because galleries allow artist to reach a broader audience. We would go directly to the source.\nThis is why it's important for me to go to LA or Berlin (or elsewhere) because those artists are not rich yet, they dont travel so much. They belong to a scene, and it does make a big difference to them if you connect in person.\nThe spirit is to have an impact on young, talented folks, and absolutely to stay at the source.\nOnce again, not sure was drifted away from this in communication\nE"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 18:40:10", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around its been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "Caroline Lang", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant"], "timestamp": "2/10/2017 6:37:32 PM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": ""}]	4
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033019.txt_22370	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033019.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "9/3/2017 5:02:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes cell 212-533-3739"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 6:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Probably won't know until tomorrow. Waiting on both Jared and Trump. Can you chat? have something to ask."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "White House this week?"}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030970.txt_22372	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030970.txt	Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill	[{"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 8:22 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill", "body": "In 1993, Powell began working as a managing director for Bankers Trust, but he quit in 1995 after the bank \n got into trouble when several customers suffered large losses due to derivatives. He then went back to work \n for Dillon, Read & \n he didnt understand the markets 25 years ago. obama appointed him to the board, what else do you guys need to know"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["J [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 10:31 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill", "body": "LMAO \n Perfect mnuchin hit"}, {"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Dec 22, 2018, at 10:35 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill", "body": "getting rid of powell much more important than syria /mattis. . I guess pompeo , only one left. . unless \n ambassador heather has a brilliant idea. - a first. . jared and ivanka, need to go. !!!"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["J [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 10:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill", "body": "Can u get rid of Powell or really get rid of mnuchin"}, {"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 3:44:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill", "body": "no, mnuchin is ok. . its simple , 15 yrs ago. the geriatrics understood that the internet was \n like telephones. connections only, then my nerds taught them thaat cyber is a weapon. , same with the \n fed. . its a weapon to be used with sophistication. . inflation is a concept from the 50s , before the internet set \n instantaneious info around the world.. s0000 dumb"}]	5
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018084.txt_22374	IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018084.txt	null	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "10/28/2010 4:16:11 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Special tax benefits could help founders and investors\nby Craig Sherman and Andrew Bryant on Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 9:10am PDT\n\nCraig Sherman and Andrew Bryant: A little noticed provision of a recently enacted federal tax law may lead\nto a significant increase in the formation of new startups and angel investing before the end of this year. If you\nhave been thinking about founding or investing in a technology startup, there is no better time to jump in and\ntake advantage of a recently enacted federal income tax benefit.\n\nPresident Obama recently signed into law changes to tax law that may, under certain circumstances, exempt\nprofits from investments in startup companies from ALL federal income tax, including alternative minimum\ntax. Yes, that’s right, if you start a new company now and sell it more than five years from now and make a $10\nmillion profit on the sale, you may owe NO federal income taxes on your profit.\n\nThis special tax benefit will apply only to stock issued to founders or investors between September 28 and\nDecember 31, 2010, so time is of the essence.\n\nThe founder or investor would have to buy and hold shares of a \"qualified small business” for five or more\nyears. A “qualified small business” is a C corporation engaged in an active trade or business with less than $50\nmillion in aggregate gross assets.\n\nIf you satisfy the above requirements and certain other conditions, you may not have to pay federal income\ntaxes on your first $10 million of gain. If there is a liquidity event within five years of your purchase of\nqualified small business stock, you may still be eligible to \"roll over\" any gains from sale of the shares tax-free\nwithin 60 days into another qualified small business."}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030837.txt_22384	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030837.txt	J.P. Morgan exclusive conference call on Thursday, November 8th at 4pm EST: "Post-election insight: The road ahead"	[{"sender": "US GIO [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "11/6/2012 10:24:50 PM", "subject": "J.P. Morgan exclusive conference call on Thursday, November 8th at 4pm EST: \"Post-election insight: The road ahead\"", "body": "We are pleased to invite you to an exclusive J.P. Morgan Private Bank conference call, “Post-election insights: The road ahead,” on Thursday, November 8 at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time.\n\nThe call will feature Peter Scher, Head of Corporate Responsibility for JPMorgan Chase. Peter is an undisputed expert in political matters, having spent nearly a decade in government service as U.S. Special Trade Negotiator and Ambassador in the Clinton administrations. The discussion will take a closer look at the election results, focusing on\n\nthe political and fiscal implications and what they mean for our clients globally.\n\nThe invitation below contains full details of the event."}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032688.txt_22387	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032688.txt	RE:	[{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 6:11:02 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Internet is crashing right now about this....trump apparently off his rocker"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:05 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026445.txt_22388	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026445.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wow I wonder what Jarred did u know DJT knew!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "5/27/2017 10:23:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "we know jared doesnt do squat without direction. . changes coming"}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032850.txt_22391	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032850.txt	Re: Trump	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "2/10/2016 7:07:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Wow"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, 10 February 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Its getting scary. The stories you could tell..."}]	2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033596.txt_22392	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033596.txt	Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "Jun 24, 2011, 7:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "eric, price for a re-rag , new seats , g-v , paint and interior, plus approx time after choosing fabrics etc."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "Saturday, June 25, 2011 12:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "not yet"}, {"sender": "Eric Roth", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "Any photos? Serial number?\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Eric Roth", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "Jeffrey-\n\nI need to start off by stating that it is not my intent to go around Shawn Lancaster on this — Shawn is a friend. \nThis being said, I have received e-mails from both you and Larry this weekend. \nI called Larry and he said I should send you an e-mail. \nI called a close friend of mine inquiring about the GV market and aircraft that are \"not published\". As of today, there are \neight (8) of these aircraft that are not yet on the market. \nLet me know if you would like to speak with him and by what means (you call him, he call you, call Larry?....whatever). \nBy the way, his company sold Trumps 727 and got Trump a very attractive number for an aircraft that was on it's way to \na museum. \n\nHope all is well. \n\nSincerely,\nEric Roth\nPresident\nInternational Jet Interiors"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "6/27/2011 4:45:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "of course i will speak send me his number, or have him call 212 750 9895"}]	5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029010.txt_22397	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029010.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016, at 6:50 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "trumps guys changing their plans . all at the trump hotel right down the street from the white house. its a bad movie, president trump. down the street from trump hotel. deepak chopra, again, sunday, I know you moved krause to tonight.."}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016, at 7:51 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "We already have plans on Sunday as I didn't hear from you. I don't think I can change them."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016, at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "no problem , I thought you told me that you had moved krause so that you could come sunday. . i must have misunderstood. . the sweatshirts were given to a few world leaders yesterday, so i thought you two should also have some. ."}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 8:04 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Thank you for the sweatshirts. The thought was very sweet. Next time you send a gift don't put any initials on it so when I regift it no one will suspect. Also in the future think jewelry. You didn't misunderstand. With you I never know what your plans are so since I didn't hear a confirmation from you or your assistant I assumed your plans had changed and you weren't able to do dinner. Just like the Paris trips :-)."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016, at 8:24 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im surprised you didnt call to confirm? :) . re regifting you just have to find people wth the same initials. . i thought that woody might like to try something that is super soft and doesnt have holes"}, {"sender": "<MII>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 8:33 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I didn't call to confirm because I attributed it to your scatterbrained quality and I just assumed that plans had changed and you weren't able to make it. In this civilized society the person being invited doesn't usually have to hound the host. And incidentally Woody doesn't feel dressed unless his clothes have holes in them."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016, at 8:36 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i asked, you told me it was ok that you had changed your plans to be able to make it. i will have someone check that you really mean what you say, ::))"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "9/17/2016 3:10:41 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I had a good idea. Why don't you join us for dinner with Lawrence Krause? That way you get to see us :-). Originally when we got those bundles I thought it was the DNA swabs."}]	8
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031297.txt_22400	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031297.txt	Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards	[{"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Peggy Siegal <I E- Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "happy to buy your 10k of chairs and will need me plus 3 seats."}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:36 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hello Jeffrey —\n\nI hope all is well with you. As per Peggy Siegal’s office, I have included here the invitation to the IFP Gotham Awards ceremony, which will be held on Monday, November 27 at Cipriani Wall Street in New York City.\n\nThis year’s ceremony is going to be another successful event. We couldn’t be more thrilled with this year’s impressive group of Tributees. The Actress Tribute will go to Nicole Kidman and the Actor Tribute to Dustin Hoffman. The Director Tribute will be given to Sofia Coppola, with the Cinematographer Tribute going to Ed Lachman. With the Industry Tribute, we will be honoring Jason Blum, founder of Blumhouse Productions. And we simply couldn’t be more pleased to honor Vice President Al Gore with this year’s special Humanitarian Tribute. With nominees this year ranging\n\nfrom Willem Dafoe, Adam Sandler and Robert Pattison to Margot Robbie, Lois Smith and Mary J. Blige, this year’s ceremony looks to be the most star studded ever.\n\nPlease let me know if you have any questions.\n\nBest regards,\nSteven"}]	2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032526.txt_22401	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032526.txt	Re: STT Customs	[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:57 AM", "subject": "Re: STT Customs", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nDue to Staffing issues,, customs cannot use North Ramp,, only PreClear in main building,,.\nTrump is suppose to depart 4pm,. Latest 4:30pm\n\nFlight time: 2+25min\n\nDo you want PBI customs or PreClear STT?\n\nThx\nLarry"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski"], "timestamp": "Apr 16, 2017, at 11:58 AM", "subject": "Re: STT Customs", "body": "pre clear. heli at 2. thanks"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "4/16/2017 4:12:22 PM", "subject": "Re: STT Customs", "body": "Ok 2pm heli\nPreClear"}]	3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032532.txt_22409	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032532.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "[email protected]", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 11:19:08 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "careful she is nottrustworthy at ALLL"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "a 2 timer?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "worse"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "lam seeing Hl a little bit \| don't think it will turn into romance \| am a bit old and not tall enough but she seems intelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The White House Fellowship Commison it came through Woody and Suzanne Johnson because she bundled best Jonathan"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 3:29:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey please help me here is she a hooker"}]	5
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031283.txt_22410	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031283.txt	Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!	[{"sender": "steven hoffenberg <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:42:25 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": ""}]	1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029085.txt_22417	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029085.txt	Re: Your Special Day	[{"sender": "David Grosof <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:07 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nCongratulations on another spin around the sun.\n\nI would like to offer you a birthday present: my best efforts for a few hours on something where I might be able to contribute either to making something good happen for you or help you prevent the bad.\n\nWe haven't talked much at all for quite some time, so I'm not sure of the nature of your current interests but here are some of mine, where I feel I either have some special capability or can get access to those who have such.\n\n* open science -- open access publishing, data publishing, and open culture institutions considered as a network with largely consistent and mutually reinforcing values: Public Library of Science (PLoS), Wikipedia, Internet"}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "1/20/2017 6:28:10 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Excellent alignment with some of my interests or those of people I like and think are smart!\nThe rest of the truncated message has been sent.\n\n1. What's been stimulating as a source of good questions for the \"distributions in nature\" issue?\n\n7. \"Signal intelligence in biol. systems\" seems to cover all of neurophysiology: Jonathan Victor, whom you met a few years ago in your office, is powerfully thoughtful on the issues of neural coding. Are there specific examples that have stimulated you to better questions or turned your thinking around?\n\n6. Are you aware of apps that purport to play music to enhance productivity and focus on tasks at hand? My buddy Reese Jones has backed that; he has a fascinating set of beliefs and projects around what may soon be understood as \"consciousness hacking.\" He's on the board of Singularity University as one of the founders. (His father was a pioneer UCSF MD researcher of hallucinogens, I believe!)\n\nMore to come in a day or so.\n\nThanks!\n\nYou're up late or you're not so east of my SF location!\nDavid\n\nPS How to trade the Trump-GOP demolition of the welfare state, erratic elevation of risks of trade disruptions and war? Has anyone from the rational center or left given thought to how to respond to a national emergency to cope with a kakistocratic seizure of emergency powers? The Patriot Act was on a 'shelf' as you know, ready to be used. What should the better folks in this country have at hand if, say, a port is subject to a radiological attack of unknown origin?"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026451.txt_22419	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026451.txt	Re: Breaking News: At least six of President Trump's advisers, including Steve Bannon and Reince Priebus, used private email accounts for government business	[{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 8:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Breaking News: At least six of President Trump's advisers, including Steve Bannon and Reince Priebus, used private email accounts for government business", "body": "Here we go again."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "9/26/2017 12:23:33 AM", "subject": "Re: Breaking News: At least six of President Trump's advisers, including Steve Bannon and Reince Priebus, used private email accounts for government business", "body": "all fun"}]	2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033582.txt_22423	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033582.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 5:29:21 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "yikes your birthday coming up next month"}, {"sender": "[email protected]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 12:25:22 P.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "plenty left"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:01 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Hi jeffrey hope all is well I think you are going to have a winderful life from now on in your opinion how much is left in this market it's been a trump triumph I gave him some money through woody best jonathan"}]	3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030823.txt_22429	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030823.txt	Fw: Little Hodiaki [I]	[{"sender": "Steven Elkman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11/23/2011 5:29:30 PM", "subject": "Fw: Little Hodiaki [I]", "body": "Subject: Little Hodiaki\n\nThe teacher said, \"Let's begin by reviewing some American History.\nWho said 'Give me Liberty , or give me Death'?\"\n\nShe saw a sea of blank faces, except for Little Hodiaki a bright foreign\nexchange student from Japan, who had his hand up:'Patrick Henry, 1775'\nshe said..\"Very good!\"\n\nWho said, 'Government of the People, by the People, for the People, shall\nnot perish from the Earth?\"\n\nAgain, no response except from Little Hodiaki, ‘Abraham Lincoln, 1863'..\n\n\"Excellent!', said the teacher continuing, ‘let's try one a bit More difficult…'\n\nWho said, 'Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country?'\nOnce again, Hodiaki's was the only hand in the air and he said;'John F. Kennedy, 1961\".\n\nThe teacher snapped at the class, ‘Class, you should be ashamed of yourselves, Little Hodiaki isn't from this\ncountry and he knows more about our history than you do.\"\n\nShe heard a loud whisper: fuck the Japs,'\n\n\"Who said that? I want to know right now!' she angrily demanded.\nLittle Hodiaki put his hand up, ‘General MacArthur, 1945.’\n\nAt that point, a student in the back said, 'I'm gonna puke.\"\n\nThe teacher glares around and asks, 'All right!!! Now who said that!?'"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029992.txt_22433	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029992.txt	Re: Fw: New York Post Morning Digest - July 1, 2016	[{"sender": "Terry KafkaMill", "recipients": ["jeff epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "7/1/2016 11:15:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw: New York Post Morning Digest - July 1, 2016", "body": "Ha! That fuckin lou barbati, its about time someone nailed him over those nuts"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Terry KafkaMill"], "timestamp": "Fri, 1 Jul 2016 07:06:06 -0400", "subject": "Re: Fw: New York Post Morning Digest - July 1, 2016", "body": "too many nuts in the spumoni"}, {"sender": "Jeff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:05 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw: New York Post Morning Digest - July 1, 2016", "body": "see top story. Below"}, {"sender": "New York Post <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, 1 Jul 2016 07:01:36 -0400 (EDT)", "subject": "New York Post Morning Digest - July 1, 2016", "body": "JULY 1, 2016\nOwner of iconic Brooklyn pizza\njoint gunned down in hit job\nThe co-owner of iconic Brooklyn pizzeria L&B\nSpumoni Gardens was shot to death in a targeted\nhit outside his Brooklyn home Thursday night.\nPolice found the slumped body of Louis Barbati,\n61, at his home on 12th Avenue in Dyker\nHeights at about 7 p.m. with gunshot wounds to\nthe head and chest, according to law-\nenforcement sources. The assassin, described as\na white man in his 30s wearing a black hoodie,\napproached Barbati, who was returning from the\nBensonhurst pizzeria, which was once at the\ncenter of a Mafia extortion plot over a sto..."}]	4
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033162.txt_22438	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033162.txt	null	[{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "4/19/2012 5:57:05 AM", "subject": null, "body": "I'm in Istanbul, private meeting of asian, middle eastern + north african families.\nApparently Donald Trump is also in town today to open the Trump Tower Istanbul."}]	1
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021235.txt_22465	IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021235.txt	Re: My Wall Street 2 Story	[{"sender": "Peggy Siegal <>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:32 PM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "Wrote this for the February issue of AVENUE Magazine. Thought it would amuse you. Tell me what you think of it.\n\nxoxo Peggy\n\nHD: Wall Street, Take Two\n\nDEK: In the upcoming sequel to Oliver Stone’s groundbreaking film, Gordon Gekko gets out of jail and back to business. Peggy Siegal takes us behind the scenes where she got herself on camera along with a few of her famous friends. Nice work if you can get it.\n\nIn 1987, right after director Oliver Stone won the Academy Award for \"Platoon,\" he immediately turned to a domestic arena and began working on \"Wall Street\" in New York City where his father had been a stockbroker. Although the film was widely seen as a scathing critique of the culture of Wall Street, Stone has said that part of the film is a defense of capitalism, his father's vision of finance (as seen through the Hal Holbrook character) and an homage to his father.\n\nAt the time Oliver was also fascinated with the connection between the psyche of Latino Miami drug dealers from his earlier \"Scarface\" script and the American-born 28- to 35-year-old, white collar stockbrokers. Both groups had an animalistic need to obtain big and fast money. They shared an obsession with corruption and greed.\n\nOliver sent his actors to Bear Stearns for research, including then-newcomer Charlie Sheen, who played Bud Fox, a kid from nowhere. When he learns to cold call, and lands one big client, Gordon Gekko, Fox is thrust into the fast lane with a rock star financial mentor who teaches him corruption.\n\nOliver needed an old-fashioned villain to create drama, and he cast Michael Douglas as Gekko against type. Michael was not known as a heavy at the time, but as a charming, handsome, sensitive leading man. Oliver also saw the anger, confidence, salesmanship and style that Michael brought to the role. Michael's Gekko looked a bit like Laker's coach Pat Riley with his slicked back hair and well-cut suits, and it became Michael’s most important role, winning him the Academy Award for the villain no one could ever forget."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal (i \|"], "timestamp": "1/12/2010 12:28:25 AM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "terrific. i want to hear more about the trip"}]	2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033176.txt_22471	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033176.txt	FW: Emailing - Trump 1_trump.pdf	[{"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "10/13/2016 10:36:57 PM", "subject": "FW: Emailing - Trump 1_trump.pdf", "body": "Attachments: Trump 1_trump.pdf\n\nImportance: High"}, {"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 13, 2016 6:36 PM", "subject": "Emailing - Trump 1_trump.pdf", "body": ""}]	2
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021553.txt_22476	IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021553.txt	B-MM-105207-D, 07/25/2008	[{"sender": "Miami", "recipients": ["Lem"], "timestamp": "07/25/2008", "subject": "Re: B-MM-105207-D, 07/25/2008", "body": "Please deliver the enclosed letter and brochures to\nIn addition, please confirm completion of this\nmatter.\nRead and Clear"}]	1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029907.txt_22482	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029907.txt	Re: Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'	[{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["J [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "3/7/2019 3:02:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'", "body": "GOOD FOR THE LACK OF DOUBLE JEOPARDY"}, {"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 7, 2019, at 4:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/opinion/letters/jeffrey-epstein.html"}, {"sender": "paul krassner <q", "recipients": ["\"Friend\"", "\"HumanEvents.com” <r-"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 11:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'", "body": "From: Ann Coulter Subject: Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a \"Trump Scandal’\n\nDate: March 6, 2019 at 5:01:34 PM PST\n\nTo: \"Friend\"\n\nReply-To: \"HumanEvents.com” <r-\nsmilbbqqlsnfcqqgvnrswzfrrbsfrffsqzpgqvagfvzccqwisb@humaneventsmail.com>\n\n=a\n\nMedia Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile\nBecame a \"Trump Scandal'\n\nStrangely, the media have suddenly taken an intense interest in the case of pedophile and\nmajor Democratic donor Jeffrey Epstein."}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032878.txt_22483	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032878.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Peter Thiel"], "timestamp": "Thursday, July 14, 2016 4:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "dont know how well you know tom barrack he is great."}, {"sender": "Peter Thiel", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:58 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Who is that?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Peter Thiel"], "timestamp": "7/14/2016 12:01:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He will be a speaker at the convention, he runs colony capital. solid, great real estate judgement. . donalds fund raiser. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2016-05-31/tom-barrack-the-donald-trump-i-know"}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019845.txt_22486	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019845.txt	When It Comes to Wall Street, Preet Bharara Is No Hero - ProPublica	[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "3/13/2017 2:45:19 PM", "subject": "When It Comes to Wall Street, Preet Bharara Is No Hero - ProPublica", "body": "https://www.propublica.org/article/when-it-comes-to-wall-street-preet-bharara-is-no-hero\n\nWhen It Comes to Wall Street, Preet Bharara Is No Hero"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033233.txt_22503	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033233.txt	null	[{"sender": "Thorbjørn Jagland", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "4/16/2017 3:04:37 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Hope you recover quickly. We have had wonderful days. Tell me when you are coming to Paris so that we can talk. I really don't understand Trump. Today I have to deal with the referendum in Turkey. Endogan is another difficult to understand"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031688.txt_22507	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031688.txt	Denis McDhimmi White House National Security Adviser Speaks to Hamas-Linked Group	[{"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 4:57:57 PM", "subject": "Denis McDhimmi White House National Security Adviser Speaks to Hamas-Linked Group", "body": "Bill Siegel thought you might find this of interest: \nhttp://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.8911/pub_detail.asp \n\nMarch 8, 2011 \nDenis McDhimmi \nWhite House National Security Adviser Speaks to Hamas-Linked Group \nBill Siegel \n\nOn March 6, in anticipation of Congressional hearings on domestic radicalization, Deputy National Security Adviser \nDenis McDonough stated the following: \n\"President Obama recognizes that through our words and deeds we can either play into al Qaeda's narrative and \nmessaging or we can challenge it and thereby undermine it. We're determined to undermine it. For example, we \nknow there are many different reasons why individuals—from many different faiths—succumb to terrorist \nideologies. And there is no one easy profile of a terrorist. But based on extensive investigations, research and \nprofiles of the violent extremists we've captured or arrested, and who falsely claim to be fighting in the name of \nIslam, we know that they all share one thing—they all believe that the United States is somehow at war with \nIslam, and that this justifies violence against Americans. So we are actively and aggressively undermining that \nideology. We're exposing the lie that America and Islam are somehow in conflict. That is why President Obama \nhas stated time and again that the United States is not and never will be at war with Islam.\" \n\nThis statement encapsulates so much of what this writer has identified as the \"Control Factor:\" that function of \nour minds which will distort our perceptions so as not to present ourselves with the ever so fearful reality that \nconfronts us under the banner of Islam today. That is, rather than to clearly see, focus upon, and set about to \ncreate strategies to properly confront the threat which we currently face- a threat that by definition we do not \ncontrol and see little way over which to regain control- our minds essentially collude to reconstruct in a manner \nwhich deludes us with the sense that we are in control. \n\n1. The statement essentially reduces the threat we face to that of terrorism caused by al-Qaeda. By defining and \nlimiting the threat to a band of \"radical extremists\" who have distorted the doctrine of a great religion, we buy \ninto the sense that our military might and criminal detection methods will ultimately save the day. The fantasy is \nthat this is a problem that we can get our arms around because under our Constitutional principles, terrorism is a \nviolation that we are permitted to fight against. \n\nYet terrorism is only one of three levels upon which the threat is attacking us and al-Qaeda is only a piece of the \nterrorism level. The second level, the \"Civilization Jihad,\" a term used by the Muslim Brotherhood itself to \ndescribe its long term effort to peaceably infiltrate American and Western society at all levels in order to bring it \ndown from the inside through the freedoms that Western Constitutions afford, is well at work and in process \ntoday. This has also been called the \"Stealth Jihad.\" \n\nThere is a third level, the \"International Institutional Jihad,\" upon which organizations such as the UN, along with \nits 57 Member State bloc the Organization of the Islamic Conference, work to push through those principles of \nSharia Law and Islamic doctrine which it Members can agree upon such as the 1990 Cairo Declaration of Human \nRights which is fully at odds with U.S. Constitutional tenets. Once these principles become international \nstandards, the institutions seek to push them into Western societies through treaties and trade deals over which \nthe Members have leverage. \n\nMcDonough's words, by limiting the threat to Al Qaeda, intentionally ignore the other levels of threat which, for \nall intents and purposes can be even more dangerous because our Constitution does not afford us easy means to \ncombat. Nor does our desired general sense of morality. \n\n2. By focusing on \"reasons\" for this terrorist piece of the pie, the Control Factor further sets out the narrative \nthat we can gain control over the problem. By looking for \"root causes,\" we advance the notion that by \neliminating or reducing those elements we can eliminate the symptom-terrorism. This is part of a long-engaged \nLeftist narrative that has been utilized across a vast array of social problems in order to gain control over funding \nand policy. Now, it is being used to avoid seeing a problem clearly, much less addressing it intelligently. \n\nIt is this administration's (and also, unfortunately, many members of Bush's as well) distortion to frame terrorism \nas a result of victimhood. That is, by establishing the root causes of terrorism as either a response to U.S. policy, \nto economic conditions, to Israeli occupation, and so on, the Control Factor sells the buried wish that since we \ncause the conditions, we can fix the symptom without the grueling costs of war and confrontation. When both \nsides collude in this form of narrative, we allow it to continue and grow. Yet placing the cause of the problem \nwithin ourselves is false and strips us of the proper incentive to stand up and fight against a threat that simply \nseeks our destruction no matter what we do. \n\n3. McDonough fights the enemy's battle for us in the simple phrase of those \"who falsely claim to be fighting in \nthe name of Islam.\" Here, the Control Factor refuses to accept what the enemy has repeatedly made clear—there \nis a Holy War between Islam and the Western world, it has been declared by a significant faction of Muslims and \nagreed upon by many more either explicitly or through silence and omission, and the war is defined by the enemy \nitself under the banner of Islam to seek the destruction of Western society as it is and to replace it with a Sharia \nbased global Islamic Ummah. This is what the enemy says itself. The Control Factor tells us that this can not be, \nthat Islam is a \"peaceful\" and \"great\" religion that has been \"hijacked\" by a few \"crazies\" and that most \nMuslims worldwide are much like us peace loving Westerners who seek a world based on mutual tolerance. If \nthere is any \"war,\" it emanates from those of us Westerners who are \"racists,\" \"bigots,\" or otherwise and fail to \nacknowledge the realities of the Muslim peoples. The critical issue here is that the Control Factor, as expressed \nthrough McDonough, takes full responsibility for defining Islam and identifying the enemy. The enemy, however, \ndefines itself and needs to identify itself both through its actions, its words, and importantly what it does not do \nand say. \n\nThis \"transfer of responsibility\" from the enemy to ourselves that McDonough's words so freely take on is \nsymptomatic of the deep addictive style the West has adopted to avoid hard confrontation. Once again, the \nControl Factor utilizes Western guilt to define the conflict as resulting from improper acts of its own. It then \nseeks to redeem itself by accommodating the enemy. This shows up in America's dealings with Islam as well as \nthe \"Israeli-Palestinian Conflict;\" responsibility for the problem is transferred to the West or Israel in a grand \npsychological effort to avoid facing the terrors and costs of hard confrontation, terror, or war. And in each \nexample, as with all psychological defenses, the defense creates the very conditions it seeks to avoid. Until the \nWest is fully able to place responsibility back upon the Islamic world for the actions it takes and omits to take, \nthe West will only dig itself deeper into a weaker position. Unfortunately, the game of guilt gives us no guidance \nas to how it is to end; when enough has been repaid. Instead, it is geared to continue indefinitely. \n\n4. McDonough's statement that the U.S. is not at war with Islam is a pleasant Control Factor fantasy but does \nlittle to eliminate the fact that the enemy has declared it so. We can walk away and pretend there is no war, \nfollow the deceptive words of those in this country engaged in the Civilization Jihad who attack us for any \nresponse to the war other than bending over backwards to accommodate Islam and tolerate that which does not \ntolerate anything other than itself. Yet that path leads only to further the cause of the enemy. \n\n5. Perhaps most telling of all of McDonough's statement is the word \"never.\" To claim we will never be at war \nwith Islam regardless of what Islam or Muslims worldwide do to us is the height of Dhimmitude—a phrase coined \nby Bat Yeor, an expert on Dhimmi behavior throughout Islamic history. In Islam, a Dhimmi is generally a Jew or \nChristian (there are others) who has agreed to accept a lesser and humiliating status with duties including the \npayment of a special tax, in exchange for life in an Islamic controlled land. It is a protection contract: you can \nlive as long as you abide by these conditions. In claiming that we could \"never\" be at war with Islam, McDonough \nhas staked out Dhimmi status for all non-Muslims in the U.S. and has put words to the famous act of Obama in \nbowing to the King of Saudi Arabia. \n\nBy denying that we are at war with Islam, McDonough has admitted that those words have meaning, just that \nthey do not fit U.S. policy. By denying that the U.S. would ever be at war with Islam, McDonough has sent the \nmessage of unconditional surrender in advance. This is pure Control Factor maneuvering and threatens our nation \nworse than the underlying threat itself. Put simply, our Constitution does not afford us easy ways to combat the \nthreat we face- we can fight certain types of terrorism in certain (albeit still under great dispute) ways yet we \nhave no effective means to combat the Civilization Jihad and are fast losing leverage to resist the International \nInstitutional Jihad. Unless and until we all obtain better control over our Control Factors so that we can develop \nsufficient acceptable means to fight on these levels, we are headed to self-destruction."}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033227.txt_22509	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033227.txt	US idiocy	[{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "3/13/2017 1:36:48 PM", "subject": "US idiocy", "body": "re your comment on predicting Trump, there is HL Mencken's famous phrase: \n\"It is IMPOSSIBLE to underestimate the intelligence of the American people.\" \nand then from Richard Hofstadter's 1964 book on Ant-intellectualism in American Life: \n\"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has \nbeen a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that \ndemocracy means that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.\" \nOnly thing stupefying me about Trump so far is that all his EPA appointees come from the great wasteland called \nOklahoma—Inhofe et al, climate change deniers to the last, but climate change is inescapable and by going back to \nour old way of doing things, it will merely come all the quicker \nall best"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030596.txt_22510	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030596.txt	Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein	[{"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "29 January 2015 at 16:49", "subject": "Re: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Epstein,\n\nI write further to an email sent to you earlier this month, concerning an article we are preparing for publication in which you may be mentioned.\n\nWe have not received a response from you. If you wish to respond, please do so as soon as possible and no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015.\n\nFor your convenience, please see the original letter below.\n\nYours faithfully,\n\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian"}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Mr Epstein"], "timestamp": "5 January 2015 at 11:14", "subject": "Swiss Accounts Survey", "body": "Dear Mr Epstein,\n\nWe are writing because a US media organisation, in concert with ourselves at the Guardian newspaper in London, is currently conducting a detailed survey of Swiss bank accounts, past and present.\n\nIt is not illegal to have Swiss accounts. But as you may know, it is a topic of considerable public debate, and several governments have been investigating the owners of such accounts.\n\nThere are a number of ways such accounts and also offshore trusts have been used to avoid inheritance tax, UK domestic tax, or tax imposed by other countries. Such accounts have also been used to launder money.\n\nWe have seen records held in the US identifying you among those who have held accounts. These accounts contained assets of up to USD 3.5m, and include:\n\n1) You may therefore have been a person evading or avoiding tax, or laundering money.\n\nWe will be particularly concerned with these questions:\n\n2) Why you had Swiss accounts.\n\n3) How much back tax you have settled with the tax authorities following their investigation of your affairs.\n\nAdditionally, from public records and from material we have seen we note that:\n\n4) In 2008 you pleaded guilty to solicitation of prostitution and procuring minors for prostitution. You were sentenced to 18 months in prison.\n\n5) Your above accounts were also linked with Mr Leslie Wexner.\n\n6) You are known to be or have previously been closely associated with Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew and Kevin Spacey.\n\n7) You have made substantial contributions to the Clintons' philanthropic causes. Tax reform campaigners have previously been critical of those who engage in public life or the political process while avoiding or evading tax. Hilary Clinton herself, speaking in 2012, noted the importance of elites paying a substantial share of tax: \"One of the issues that I have been preaching about around the world is collecting taxes in an equitable manner — especially from the elites in every country.\"\n\nIt is intended shortly to publish the results of our survey in both the US and the UK.\n\nAs responsible journalists acting in the public interest, we would first like to give you the opportunity to comment.\n\nIf we do not hear from you by 18:00 on Monday 12th January 2015 (preferably by email to _________________, we shall proceed on the basis that you do not wish to comment on or amend our information.\n\nBut we have approached you in a straightforward fashion and hope you will take this opportunity to respond if you wish. Your substantive responses to each of our numbered points will be carefully considered and published if appropriate.\n\n(For the avoidance of doubt, we do not normally regard any generalised assertion of \"inaccuracies\" as a substantive response; nor any generalised statement that the holders acted on advice. Neither will we regard as substantive any comment that only refers to the present state of affairs and not to the past.)\n\nWe are, of course, happy to discuss directly any concerns you may have.\n\nWe would be most grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this letter. This will save us from chasing.\n\nYours faithfully,\n\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian"}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Mr Weinberg"], "timestamp": "January 30, 2015, 12:00:34 PM EST", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Weinberg,\n\nI hope this email finds you well. I am a journalist at The Guardian newspaper in London.\n\nWe are preparing for publication an article in which we may mention Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client.\n\nWe have sent Mr Epstein an email concerning this article and made a number of attempts to contact him, to which he has not responded.\n\nPlease see the email in question below. Should Mr Epstein wish to respond, please ensure that we receive his response by no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015.\n\nI would be grateful if you could acknowledge receipt of this email.\n\nYours faithfully,\n\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [[email protected]]", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "1/30/2015 5:54:21 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]	4
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031526.txt_22520	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031526.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "On Nov 10, 2016, at 4:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ehud in on sun pritzkermon. you around? dinner woody sunday. or have you gone dark"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:45 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got it.\n\nNow remember"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Times bad. R u around Tuesday?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "On Nov 11, 2016, at 10:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No phone today?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can call circa 11"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "On Nov 11, 2016, at 10:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 3:24:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What number"}]	7
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033189.txt_22524	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033189.txt	Fwd: Responding to yesterday's election	[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:55:01 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Responding to yesterday's election", "body": "Look what has happened to your borough.."}, {"sender": "Dr. Bruce L. Dennis <j", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:14 AM", "subject": "Responding to yesterday's election", "body": "Dear Packer Families,\n\nLike many of you, I am writing this message on very little sleep. Last night was like no other in our\npolitical memory, defying the predictions of the most erudite pundits and political\nprognosticators.\n\nToday, we are spending a great deal of time unpacking the election results with our students\nacross the three divisions — during morning meeting and throughout the day in Lower School\nclassrooms, in Middle School advisories, during Upper School Community time, as well as in\nmany individual classroom conversations. I write to assure you that we will do our best to handle\nthese discussions with balance, sensitivity, and fairness.\n\nGiven that last week's mock election among Packer’s Upper School students showed that over\n80% favored Secretary Clinton, I don’t think it’s a huge leap to assume that there was more\ndisappointment than joy in Packer households as results unfolded last night. At the same time,\nthere are certainly Packer families who support Mr. Trump and are pleased with this outcome. As\na school community, we have an obligation to recognize that there will be a broad array of feelings\ngenerated by the election results, and it is our responsibility as a school to make space for these\nfeelings to be expressed thoughtfully and compassionately, as well as to model the tolerance and\nacceptance of difference that are among our core values. No doubt, we have our work cut out for\nus, but Iam confident in the good that we can do as a community."}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029979.txt_22526	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029979.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "7/17/2012 8:05:30 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i spoke with Janusz and he was agreeable and happy to stay on and continue working for you \nhis wife is still working for trump but that will be short term and she will then look for new work \nif janusz still works for you he plans to live on the property with his wife \nplease advise if i should reinstate his employment and if so as of what date?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2012, at 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:44 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "just mentioned that you were open to entertaining Janusz staying on with a new clearly defined role \nShould i call and feel him out?"}]	3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030610.txt_22536	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030610.txt	any fun?	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Boris Niki"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "any fun?", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "boris", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "any fun?", "body": "Different kind of fun.\nIt is fun for a short time but iam already getting sick of so many meetings!\n\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has\n\nsome questions re microsoft.\nHow are you?\nboris"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028497.txt_22542	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028497.txt	2017 IFP Gotham Awards	[{"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "happy to buy your 10k of chairs and will need me plus 3 seats."}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:38 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hi Jeffrey — \nSounds good. Thanks so much for confirming. If you or someone in your office could provide the information below, I \ncan send along an invoice and contribution letter for your $10K donation toward the chairs. \n\nCOMPANY NAME (if applicable): \nCONTACT NAME: \nADDRESS LINE 1: \nADDRESS LINE 2: \n\nMany thanks."}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:40 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "just send to peggy. you her co. its better for her"}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E.", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Sounds good, works for me. \nSo, Peggy, if you could just let me know what info to include on the donation letter and invoice, I'll send that along your \nway. \n\nCOMPANY NAME (if applicable): \nCONTACT NAME: \nADDRESS LINE 1: \nADDRESS LINE 2:"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "11/20/2017 8:09:46 PM", "subject": "RE: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Dear Steven, \nSee below: \n\nCompany Name: The Peggy Siegal Company \nContact Name: Peggy Siegal \nAddress: 750 Lexington Avenue 5th Floor New York, New York 10022."}]	5
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032663.txt_22566	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032663.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Dec 5, 2017, at 3:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I am planning to be in paris starting the 9th for the week. any chance to see you"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 5:03 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "can we have dinner in geneva on the 8th? i will be there on 7 and 8 dec and going back to kuwait on the 9th"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 5, 2017, at 2:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "at the moment i was flying to paris on the 8th. . I can leave eariler and get to paris by 830 . if you like to meet there. geneve difficult to fly out of at night. or lunch sat in paris. ,"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "???"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Of courses"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:17 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You are welcome at my house always . And more private"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:37 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "very well .. just send me the address again and the code to the door so i can get to the second floor? and send me the day and time. thnx"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:44 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "lOpm should I bring special cake from New York"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "sorry that is 2512 for the gate Ii"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 9:55 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i m at the door but i will wait for my time.. i dont want to come early to find trump in your house00"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 11:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "no come now !!!"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "12/9/2017 7:00:51 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i forget to ask.. is there any new update about the saudi project that i sent you??"}]	13
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013415.txt_22573	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013415.txt	Privileged and Confidential	[{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jackie Perczek"], "timestamp": "4/7/2011 1:27 PM", "subject": "Privileged and Confidential", "body": "See additional articles.\n\nAttachments: Edwards Articles -1.doc; Edwards Articles - 12.pdf; Edwards Articles - 10.pdf; Edwards Articles - 9.doc; Edwards Articles - 8.doc; Edwards Articles - 7.doc; Edwards Articles - 6.doc; Edwards Articles - 5.doc; Edwards Articles - 3.doc; Edwards Articles - 2.doc; Edwards Article - 13.pdf; Part.012"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032883.txt_22577	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032883.txt	Re: Trump	[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "you think he will win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:08:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "ask again 30th"}]	4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030592.txt_22590	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030592.txt	Fw: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein	[{"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "29 January 2015 at 16:49", "subject": "Re: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Epstein, \nI write further to an email sent to you earlier this month, concerning an article we are preparing for publication in which you may be mentioned. \nWe have not received a response from you. If you wish to respond, please do so as soon as possible and no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015. \nFor your convenience, please see the original letter below."}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "5 January 2015 at 11:14", "subject": "Swiss Accounts Survey", "body": "Dear Mr Epstein, \nWe are writing because a US media organisation, in concert with ourselves at the Guardian newspaper in London, is currently conducting a detailed survey of Swiss bank accounts, past and present. \nIt is not illegal to have Swiss accounts. But as you may know, it is a topic of considerable public debate, and several governments have been investigating the owners of such accounts. \nThere are a number of ways such accounts and also offshore trusts have been used to avoid inheritance tax, UK domestic tax, or tax imposed by other countries. Such accounts have also been used to launder money. \nWe have seen records held in the US identifying you among those who have held accounts. These accounts contained assets of up to USD 3.5m, and include: \nHSBC (Suisse) SA \nFAMILY INTEREST L.P. \n22079 \nBESSIE \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \n1) You may therefore have been a person evading or avoiding tax, or laundering money. \nWe will be particularly concerned with these questions: \n2) Why you had Swiss accounts. \n3) How much back tax you have settled with the tax authorities following their investigation of your affairs. \nAdditionally, from public records and from material we have seen we note that: \n4) In 2008 you pleaded guilty to solicitation of prostitution and procuring minors for prostitution. You were sentenced to 18 months in prison. \n5) Your above accounts were also linked with Mr Leslie Wexner. \n6) You are known to be or have previously been closely associated with Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew and Kevin Spacey. \n7) You have made substantial contributions to the Clintons' philanthropic causes. Tax reform campaigners have previously been critical of those who engage in public life or the political process while avoiding or evading tax. Hilary Clinton herself, speaking in 2012, noted the importance of elites paying a substantial share of tax: \"One of the issues that I have been preaching about around the world is collecting taxes in an equitable manner — especially from the elites in every country.\" \nIt is intended shortly to publish the results of our survey in both the US and the UK. \nAs responsible journalists acting in the public interest, we would first like to give you the opportunity to comment. \nIf we do not hear from you by 18:00 on Monday 12th January 2015 (preferably by email to \nwe shall proceed on the basis that you do not wish to comment on or amend our information. \nBut we have approached you in a straightforward fashion and hope you will take this opportunity to respond if you wish. Your substantive responses to each of our numbered points will be carefully considered and published if appropriate. \n(For the avoidance of doubt, we do not normally regard any generalised assertion of \"inaccuracies\" as a substantive response; nor any generalised statement that the holders acted on advice. Neither will we regard as substantive any comment that only refers to the present state of affairs and not to the past.) \nWe are, of course, happy to discuss directly any concerns you may have. \nWe would be most grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this letter. This will save us from chasing."}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 30, 2015 12:00 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Weinberg, \nI hope this email finds you well. I am a journalist at The Guardian newspaper in London. \nWe are preparing for publication an article in which we may mention Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client. \nWe have sent Mr Epstein an email concerning this article and made a number of attempts to contact him, to which he has not responded. \nPlease see the email in question below. Should Mr Epstein wish to respond, please ensure that we receive his response by no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015. \nI would be grateful if you could acknowledge receipt of this email."}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "1/30/2015 7:03:47 PM", "subject": "Fw: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]	4
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029042.txt_22593	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029042.txt	Re: interesting	[{"sender": "Alain Forget", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "11/18/2016 11:18:14 AM", "subject": "Re: interesting", "body": "no, interesting to figure out where it is heading....the funny side it was at the vatican"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 18, 2016, at 12:14 PM", "subject": "Re: interesting", "body": "your view?"}, {"sender": "Alain Forget", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 7:12 AM", "subject": "Re: interesting", "body": "Donald Trump’s newly named chief strategist and senior counselor, Steve Bannon, laid out his global nationalist vision in unusually in-depth remarks delivered by Skype to a conference held inside the Vatican in the summer of 2014.\n\nWell before victories for Brexit and Trump seemed possible, Bannon declared there was a “global tea party movement” and praised European far-right parties like Great Britain’s UKIP and France’s National Front. Bannon also suggested that a racist element in far-right parties “all gets kind of washed out,” that the West was facing a “crisis of capitalism” after losing its “Judeo-Christian foundation,” and he blasted “crony capitalists” in Washington for failing to prosecute bank executives over the financial crisis.\n\nThe remarks — beamed into a small conference room in a 15th-century marble palace in a secluded corner of the Vatican — were part of a 50-minute Q&A during a conference focused on poverty hosted by the Human Dignity Institute, which BuzzFeed News attended as part of its coverage of the rise of Europe’s religious right. The group was founded by Benjamin Harnwell, a longtime aide to Conservative member of the European Parliament Nirj Deva to promote a “Christian voice” in European politics. The group has ties to some of the most conservative factions inside the Catholic\n\nChurch; Cardinal Raymond Burke, one of the most vocal critics of Pope Francis who was ousted from a senior Vatican position in 2014, 1s chair of the group’s advisory board.\n\nBuzzFeed News originally posted a transcript beginning 90 seconds into the then-\n\nBreitbart News chairman’s remarks because microphone placement made the opening"}]	3