Split (1)

train · 5.08k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

thread_id stringlengths 37 43	source_file stringlengths 35 37	subject stringlengths 0 231 ⌀	messages stringlengths 88 34.9k	message_count int64 1 42
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026355.txt_21295	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026355.txt	Fwd: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Enud Barak	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "4/23/2015 5:44:25 PM", "subject": "Fwd: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Enud Barak", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Ehud Barak", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:34 AM", "subject": "Fwd: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Ehud Barak", "body": "Hi Jeff\n\nBill Clinton 1994.\nFood for thought.\nEB\n\nhttp://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000369298\n\nSent from my iPhone"}]	2
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023268.txt_21308	IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023268.txt	null	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Leon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:20 AM", "subject": null, "body": "however - that is all in the past.\nIn order to move forward\n\nI would ask that you realize that very unlike yours, My business is only comprised of my personal\nattention and my personal time . Time that I was forced to grossly overspend on your various issues\nlast year. . As you are my very close friend I will not have you participate in a bidding process that I\nhave decided 1 will have this year for my time . (hopefully a more fair way to allocate ) I would also\nask that you keep in mind that though our deal expired months ago. (also keeping in mind , that your\nunderstanding of the final payment terms neither reflected the emails or my memory, we finished it up\nyour way. ) I have answered every call Brad , joslin, Ada or you, have made . reviewed docs over and\nover/ until once again, I was forced to insert myself strongly as I thought it dangerous not to. I made\nserious dollar and time concessions last year.very serious I am wiling to continue to accommodate\nsome of your concerns , but I am, under no circumstances , none, willing to spend my time for free.\nits not fair. After cleaning up Carlyn's mess , which was a few weeks and 30 million dollars . We\nwere both highly aware of the dire circumstances in which you found yourself last year, and in fact due\npredominately to its seriousness. and those very circumstances I took extra care in our negotiations .\n(you had claimed I had you over a barrel , ( a horrible position to be in with my very close friend.),\nunfortunately I fear that if you are not cautious ,in the near future, another barrel will appear of your\nown design )\n\nI heard you when you said you believed 1 had already been paid for the work that is now required. The\nart partnership has fully answered all your concerns and discharged all my obligations and more so.\n. (FYI Carlyns art partnership that you referenced is similar in only its title.) You will also recall\nthat you required that my payments be at the end of my work not at the beginning as everyone else's .(\nmy work was never to include hours upon hours of training your staff). I eventually agreed, this of\ncourse should make clear that the 2014 tax year that will close Oct 2015 is not covered by our past\nagreement at all. I pointed this very fact out to you when I initially proposed a multi year agreement\nright out of the box. you said you preferred not. As you said ,I have produced results to date, far in\nexcess of even my own exalted opinion of my projections. I have devoted a monumental amount of my\nlimited amount of time-- way, way in excess of our agreement. I will be fair, I am willing to roll in\nthe amount still outstanding from last year if that helps .. However, As my best student , and my only\none, you are now capable of doing most, if not all, of the required work yourself. I can put my\nwhiteboard away when you come to eat and just have fun, trade stories,. share moments ideas etc.. I\nam of course always available to guide you as a friend if you choose that route . always . It will take a\ngreat deal of your time , but you will not have to spend any more money on mine .\n\nWe are scheduled to meet fri at 430 , I leave at 5 am sat morning.\n\nYesterday , I again spent hours upon hours of my time with your office. ,( speak to brad to get\nflavor) and you and 1 will discuss the results in gory gruesome detail on Friday. it mirrored many other\nweeks spent doing the things that I don;t have the time to do.\n\nIn order to keep things in perspective, maybe reviewing an analogy I have used before with you,\n\nmight be helpful. You and your family are a 6 billion dollar corp. with an income between 250 -500\nmillion dollars per year. It contains a few operating biz's , a large wide array of existing investments,"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella - tsi—<“itsSCS"], "timestamp": null, "subject": null, "body": ""}]	2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032719.txt_21311	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032719.txt	RE:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 10:02 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "megann and memasters tried to resign"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "1/15/2018 3:05:52 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "And...2??? Trump stopped them? He cannot stand mcgahn"}]	2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031800.txt_21316	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031800.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Keyu Jin", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "December 22, 2018 at 12:49:20 AM EST", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I also wanted to say how grateful I am and have been for your support, and also your support of my father's work. I don't say these things often enough but it is I hope implied."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 7:03 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Sent 45 minutes after she sent an outline.\n\nI had sent a comment in mtg w her father flattering her father and saying other China officials had flattered him as well."}, {"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 22, 2018, at 7:18 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "trump - borderline insane. dersh, a few feet further from the border but not by much"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Of course. Who knows whether I'm serious? Not at this moment me.\n\nWill trump crack into insanity?"}, {"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 1:04:05 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "this is not a new phenomenon for him. in the past he was told not to come out of his apt. thats how he got through near personal bankruptcy. is strength is remarkable. he is pounded 24/7. I hope someone close to him gets indicted , but not sure, otherwise the pressure of the unkown will force him to do crazy things."}]	5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031460.txt_21326	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031460.txt	My review today in wsj of conspiracy theories	[{"sender": "Ed", "recipients": ["Epstein, Jeff [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "12/19/2015 2:36:13 AM", "subject": "My review today in wsj of conspiracy theories", "body": "They're Not Really Out to Get You \nBy EDWARD JAY EPSTEIN \nDec. 18, 2015, Wall Street Journal \n\nConspiracy, a word derived from the Latin \"to breathe together,\" has been a salient part of the darker \nside of recorded history ever since some 60 conspirators in the Roman senate, including Brutus and \nCassius, plotted together to assassinate Julius Caesar in 44 B.C. Nowadays the \"C\" word does not always \nsit well with journalists, who commonly employ it in conjunction with \"theory\" to describe paranoid \ndistortions of reality. \nEven so, a criminal conspiracy is not a rare phenomenon. Not only was a foreign conspiracy responsible \nfor the monstrous 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center (as well as the previous attempt to blow it up in \n1993) but, according to the Center on Law and Security at Fordham University, over 90% of routine federal \nindictments for terrorist attacks since 9/11 contain at least one conspiracy charge. The government's \npursuit of conspiracies is by no means limited to terrorism. Conspiracy charges are the rule rather than \nthe exception in cases brought against businessmen accused of fixing prices, evading environmental \nregulations, using insider information or laundering money. \nBut there are also pseudo-conspiracies that exist only in a delusionary or misinformed mind. And some of \nthem achieve a huge following. In Pakistan, according to public opinion polls, a majority of the \npopulation believes that the 9/11 attack was staged by President George W. Bush to launch a war on Islam. \nThe claim that the 1969 moon landing was faked is still around. Just two days ago a crew from a Russian \nTV channel rushed to my apartment to interview me about a viral post on YouTube in which the deceased \ndirector Stanley Kubrick supposedly made a deathbed confession to having filmed the landing in a \nHollywood studio—even though everything about the post, including a fake Kubrick, was untrue. \nWhy people believe in pseudo-conspiracies is the focus of Rob Brotherton's fascinating book \"Suspicious \nMinds.\" Mr. Brotherton, an academic psychologist, advances the thesis that the belief in pseudo-\nconspiracies proceeds from the \"quirks and foibles\" in the way that the human brain, or at least some \nhuman brains, process evidence. He lucidly reviews studies showing common defects in the brain's wiring, \nsuch as the bias that selects evidence to confirm rather than undermine a pre-adopted thesis. \"We seek \nwhat we expect to find,\" as Mr. Brotherton puts it. Relatedly, \"biased assimilation\" causes us to \n\"interpret ambiguous events in light of what we already believe.\" \nDiscussing Richard Hofstadter's 1964 essay \"The Paranoid Style in American Politics,\" Mr. Brotherton \naccepts Hofstadter's characterization of proponents of politically motivated conspiracy theories as \n\"paranoid\" and suffering from \"a psychic phenomenon\" that prevents them from seeing the absurdity of \ntheir position. But he disagrees with Hofstadter that this condition affects only a small number of \npeople on the fringes of society. For Mr. Brotherton, \"conspiracy theories thrive in the mainstream.\" \nUntil the controversy over the validity of Warren Commission's 1966 report on the Kennedy assassination, \nthe phrase \"conspiracy theory\" had a more neutral meaning, suggesting a plausible yet unproven claim \nabout multiple actors in a single event. Only in the aftermath of the Warren Commission did it become a \nderogatory term used to suggest theories that subvert conventional wisdom. To those who doubted the \ncommission's finding that a single gunman killed Kennedy, Earl Warren became, Mr. Brotherton's says, the \n\"figurehead in a vast cover-up.\" \nIt is not easy to find an objective criterion that distinguishes the inquiry into a real conspiracy from \none that chases a pseudo-conspiracy. Both types rely are the eyewitnesses, documents and forensic \nevidence. The best that Mr. Brotherton can offer on this score is to cite Stewart Potter's famous comment \non pornography: \"I know it when I see it.\" In the context of suspicious minds, though, one person might \nsee a plausible case for a conspiracy and another only outlandish connections. The distinction is in the \nmind of the beholder. \nMr. Brotherton offers a sample list of conspiracy theories, including ones alleging that Abraham Lincoln \nwas assassinated on the orders of his vice president; that the moon landing was faked; that Area 51 in \nNew Mexico is home to extra-terrestrial technology under government auspices; that President Obama is \"a \ncommunist Muslim from Kenya.\" Such theories are meant to show that suspicious minds leap to absurd \nconclusions. These are chosen because there is no evidence to support them. \nThe picture changes, however, if we consider, for example, the theory claiming that Lincoln's assassin, \nJohn Wilkes Booth was part of a larger conspiracy backed by the Confederacy. On April 14, 1865, at about \nthe same time that Booth shot Lincoln, one of his associates stabbed Secretary of State William Seward \nand another stalked Vice President Andrew Johnson with a loaded gun. The military commission appointed by \nPresident Johnson, after hearing 371 witnesses testify and after examining Confederate bank transfers and \ncipher communications, concluded that the three attacks were part of a conspiracy sponsored by the \nConfederacy and convicted eight of Booth's associates, four of whom were hanged. Here we have a \nconspiracy theory proceeding not from crackpots but from a government commission backed by the new \npresident and most members of Lincoln's cabinet. \nClearly the defects in the brain's wiring that lead to crazy theories may lead to the confirmation of \ntheories that are adopted by rational people. Indeed, the confirmation bias can work in contradictory \nways: confirming not only conspiracy theories but the impulse to reject them in favor of conventional \nwisdom. Can this defect be corrected? Here I am reminded of a woody Allen's absolutely brilliant 1996 \ncomedy \"Everyone says 1 Love You,\" in which the once-liberal son of a New York liberal family starts \nspouting conservative theories until a doctor solves the problem by restoring the proper flow of oxygen \nto his brain. The movie has a happy ending when the son goes back to spouting his family's liberal \ntheories. While Mr. Brotherton offers no such remedy to our brain's defects, he does offer a thought-\nprovoking analysis and an appealing guide to thinking about conspiracies, real and imagined. \nhttp://www.wsj.com/articles/theyre-not-really-out-to-get-you-1450471512 \n\nHappy New Year \nEd"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029549.txt_21327	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029549.txt	Re: boosting strategy	[{"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["Tyler Shears"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Hi Tyler, \nIm at a Kinko's. \nI see that you're boosting non-website url's -- are you sure this is the right approach? (vs. boosting Jeffrey's sites?) the \n.org and foundation sites are slipping down and the USVI and science are permanently off the first page. \nThanks for you input. \nChristina"}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:33 AM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "We are pushing up the highest authority domains available for \"Jeffrey Epstein\" in general. I had reserved the \napproach of pushing non-website URLs for a few months because you expressed concern with making sure \nour URLs are on first page... but I had call w/ Mr. Epstein in the beginning of January and expressed that is a \nlimiting factor for moving Forbes/NYPost as quickly as we'd like. \nGetting up different types of results for different folks is required to dislodge the negative placements. Once \nthey are dislodged it is much easier to restore our websites back to the rankings and have our \"ideal\" first \npage. The reason for this is Google tracks click data on results and as soon as Forbes/NYPost are on second \npage they will begin a slow death (less clicks on those, more clicks on the ones we have on first page) \nFrom there we will see our properties shoot up due to the interlinking between them and the reinforcement we \ncan provide from sites like Harvard, Nat Geo, and any other publications we have influence over. Using the \n\"short-term\" links is one battle around other pages is just a part of the overall war... You saw how Google was \nchanging up much more dramatically when we had multiple Epstein's on the first page vs. having a saturated \nfirst page. \nI feel like time was lost focusing on making sure it was Mr. Epstein properties when he has giving explicit \npermission to promote any URL required to dislodge the negatives. \nI hope this makes sense.. I haven't heard from Rich on the last invoice I sent (1/29/14) and am hoping all is \nwell. Do you know if he's out of the office ?"}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["Tyler Shears"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:47 AM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Hi Tyler, \nOk thanks so much for the review. I've cc'd Jeffrey. I'll be in touch this afternoon. \nChristina Galbraith"}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith", "Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:17 PM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Thank you Christina - I tried your cell a few minutes ago and will be available on mine at your convenience. It \nis imperative we get a placement out by mid next week in order for us to hit the timeline I spoke to Mr. Epstein \nabout.. The fresh piece needs to come out while we are dislodging the current results (as you are observing \nnow). \nMr. Epstein if you have any questions on current status vs. our conversation around Jan 10. please advise - We \nare continuing to work aggressively to clean up results per our last call. I am also available to discuss this at \nyour convenience today or over weekend. \nSincerely, \nTyler Shears"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Tyler Shears", "Christina Galbraith"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 6:56 PM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "About 4,880,000 results (0.33 seconds) different computer, not good"}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:32 PM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Understand the two negatives are still present. We are still on track per our last call of 60 days from 1/10 if we \ncan get the placement out next week Christina is preparing for us and results continue to respond as they have \nbeen. \nIt takes 30 days for Google to respond in most cases and we ramped up 28 days ago with boosting alternate \nURLs per our call \nWe are working very hard to make this happen and should have Christina set up to support us with columns on \na few top sites at no cost moving forward \nI am available for a call now or this weekend to review."}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Tyler Shears"], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 8, 2014 2:07 AM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Almost finished with a batch of content as well as a press release--you'll have it over the weekend. \nAlso the PED set up a page called 'Friends' which is where they'll place jeffrey. I'll send you the URL when \ndone. \nTyler, could you check google highlighter? \nThank you, \nChristina Galbraith"}]	7
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033361.txt_21336	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033361.txt	FW: epstein	[{"sender": "Roy Black", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "Jackie Perczek"], "timestamp": "5/29/2019 4:57:42 PM", "subject": "FW: epstein", "body": "fyi"}, {"sender": "Roy Black", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 29, 2019 12:57 PM", "subject": "epstein", "body": "Dear: we have no comment on the trump story. We are finalizing our pleading regarding the plaintiff’s position on remedies. I intend to hold off commenting until we file it. After that I will be free to comment on the pleading which will address your question."}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026652.txt_21347	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026652.txt	Press: Heatstreat- 'Shady' Israeli Mogul Hires Ex-White House Counsel To Represent Employee Arrested in Inauguration Day Riot, Raising Questions	[{"sender": "Jamie Glick (DC)", "recipients": ["Ruemmler, Kathy (DC)", "Kurlander, Stuart (DC)"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, Jan 24, 2017, 10:04 AM", "subject": "Press: Heatstreat- 'Shady' Israeli Mogul Hires Ex-White House Counsel To Represent Employee Arrested in Inauguration Day Riot, Raising Questions", "body": "Hi Kathy and Stuart,\n\nYou may have already seen this article, but sharing it just in case you haven't. Please let us know if we can be of any help coordinating with the client's PR firm, which Stuart mentioned that you were doing yesterday.\n\nAccording to Wikipedia, \"Heat Street is a libertarian conservative news, opinion and commentary website. Launched in February 2016, the website is headed by U.S. based British writer and former politician Louise Mensch. It is owned by News Corp under Dow Jones & Company.\"\n\nThanks,\nJamie"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler (DC)", "recipients": ["Glick, Jamie (DC)", "Kurlander, Stuart (DC)"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 24, 2017 10:24 AM", "subject": "RE: Press: Heatstreat- 'Shady' Israeli Mogul Hires Ex-White House Counsel To Represent Employee Arrested in Inauguration Day Riot, Raising Questions", "body": "Gotta love the conspiracy theorists"}, {"sender": "Jamie Zuieback (DC)", "recipients": ["Ruemmler, Kathy (DC)"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, Jan 24, 2017, 10:37 AM", "subject": "RE: Press: Heatstreat- 'Shady' Israeli Mogul Hires Ex-White House Counsel To Represent Employee Arrested in Inauguration Day Riot, Raising Questions", "body": "I'm dying to hear about your weekend. I can't take credit, but I heard someone say that you handling this was like asking your buddies if they had anyone who could fill in for a pick-up game, and somebody sends over LeBron."}, {"sender": "Jamie Glick (DC)", "recipients": ["Ruemmler, Kathy (DC)"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 23, 2017 6:03 PM", "subject": "Press: Buzzfeed and NY Post- Prosecutors Charge Protesters With Rioting Over Inauguration Day Protests", "body": "Hi Kathy,\n\nIn case you haven't seen, below are a couple of articles and tweets which mention your representation of a journalist employed by Vocativ.\n\nThanks,\nJamie"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "1/24/2017 4:21:55 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Press: Heatstreat- 'Shady' Israeli Mogul Hires Ex-White House Counsel To Represent Employee Arrested in Inauguration Day Riot, Raising Questions", "body": "Look at this craziness."}]	5
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022265.txt_21350	IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022265.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 6, 2017 10:59 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "jack morris partner marino could be the problem forlicencing. ibis can help i think"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 14, 2017 9:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bet trump leaked the 2 pages...cross the government's star witness tomorrow...it's odd \| still do this shit..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 14, 2017 10:52 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Which case"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 15, 2017 8:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Pennsylvania"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 15, 2017 8:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "turk or..."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "3/15/2017 12:14:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Corruption...client is Richard ireland"}]	6
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026369.txt_21352	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026369.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jan 22, 2016, at 6:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "talking to macgiver, disturbs me, and that takes a lot"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 6:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What part do you find disturbing? Do you think he is losing it?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 4:58 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You were right and I was wrong. Humble pie, crow , or my own words is what i get to eattoday. your choice"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 8:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Meaning I win the bet that I will never receive an apology and acknowledgment of acceptance of responsibility?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 23, 2016, at 8:40 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i could never ever verify its authenticity. so- yes ."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 23, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will just say I told you so. Not to sound overly dramatic, but he is very close to being a psychopath -- he has no conscience. It's scary."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 23, 2016, at 9:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I was wrong"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 9:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He obviously said something to you yesterday that was disturbing, and you don't want to tell me. Just tell me - - I can take it. I promise."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemm ler"], "timestamp": "1/23/2016 3:28:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "My memory is a friend killer - I stopped talking to clinton when he swore, with whole hearted conviction to me , that he had done something, , he had forgotten that he also swore the exact opposite to me only weeks before. ."}]	9
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025660.txt_21353	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025660.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 4:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Steve Bannon Feb 24 (1 day ago)\n\n=\n\nmichael-flynn-trump-423437"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler <q>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 4:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "While he might like to, his lawyer would advise him against it. :-)\nAre you feeling better today?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 4:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "onlyu slightly. ariane said ben giving her a very hard time, and did not know about tattoo"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler <>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 5:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Uh oh — You dimed out\n\nWhat is Benjamin upset about?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 5:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "she said he wants her to do wife like things. ugh"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler <>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 5:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Barf."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "2/25/2018 10:33:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yup"}]	7
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032731.txt_21360	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032731.txt	What’s up in trump World?	[{"sender": "HS", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "lhsoffice"], "timestamp": "3/7/2018 9:51:44 AM", "subject": "What’s up in trump World?", "body": ""}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029207.txt_21369	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029207.txt	Re: deception	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Ed Boyden"], "timestamp": "7/14/2014 9:45:41 AM", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "definitely"}, {"sender": "Ed Boyden <M11=IMMI>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:50 AM", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "Sorry again for that last minute cancellation in the Spring -- alas,\nthe perils of running a new center, that I no longer control my\nschedule like in the good old days. But the Obama BRAIN Initiative is\nrunning strong, and MIT has a good bid for a seat at the table, so\nthat is good. Want to revisit a time for a chat? My schedule is now\nmuch more free, thanks to these BRAIN initiative activities\nlaunching..."}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Neil"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:08 AM", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "Good morning Neil...I am afraid Jeffrey must cancel his trip up today...he is sick in bed and not well. I am\nso very sorry to do this last minute. Hopefully we can circle back to this soon.\n\nThank you,\nLesley\nAssistant to Jeffrey Epstein"}, {"sender": "Neil Gershenfeld", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2013, at 12:32 AM", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "Confirming lunch noon Friday at my office, E15-401. Sunglasses\nwill be a warm-up for meeting in more entertaining venues.\n\nNeil\nand beach balls optional, hopefully this"}]	4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030742.txt_21372	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030742.txt	Re: privleged	[{"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re: privleged", "body": "lots of reporters inquiries. !. do i think that trump set me up? what do i know about his dealings? . did i speak to you? suggestion. all public record, house bought out of a bankruptcy proceding. I was the stalking horse bid. . never before was there a prosecution of erotic massage by women for money in someones home. every girl got money. returned. most interviewed by police over 21. all public record. . some concern on my team that i will get a cong subpoena. do i have to wear a tie?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 11:13:27 AM", "subject": "Re: privleged", "body": "Again! Why you need a team in place! Where are you with 011ie?"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029213.txt_21376	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029213.txt	Re: Fwd:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 1:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "You need to talk to boss"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 6:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "understood. it comes down to high risk / reward / low risk / reward. professional, emotional. and financial"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Most girls do not have to worry about this crap."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "\"girls?\"„ careful i will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any.....also if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate summit, clinton ,security council, holy shit im on for next 30 minutes"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you going to manage all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get sick of me....just sat down on the train so can't talk freely."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "train? yes , i will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in room 1, gunshot in surgery, and the \"cook\" well' -- he can wait"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories, however. DC today, back in NY on Sunday morning."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Yep. And now he is a repeat offender."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:00 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "double whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Uh, yeah. We will now go through a period of self-reflection and despair."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "reid or governor"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Gov is not jewish"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "of course not, he wouldnt have been so stupid."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Correct. One time, maybe. Twice, no way."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:48:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "if you have a chance"}]	18
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022346.txt_21380	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022346.txt	Re: Oil options [C]	[{"sender": "Nay Gupta", "recipients": ["[email protected] <[email protected]>", "Tazia Smith", "Paul Morris/db/"], "timestamp": "03/12/2014 09:35 PM GDT", "subject": "Oil options", "body": "Jeffrey \nVinit Sahni/db/IIIIIIIIIIII \nJust got off the phone with Vinit. \nDB stopped marketmaking OTC oil options - for short dated Pd go for exch traded - better liquidity and lower transaction costs in and \nout. \nMy central scenario - Kerry Lavrov meeting Friday will be a bust and the Crimea referendum this weekend will result in \"yes\" given \nthe 59pct ethic Russian makeup. Sunday/ Monday sanction rhetoric from ranging from g8 expulsion to Iran-style bank embargo is \nraised a notch. Russia follows with more threats of counter-sanctions. My sense is the Obama 5m of 696m SPR release is to show \nMerkel and co he will step in. He needs to because there are 8 small European and Baltic countries that rec 70%+ of their gas from \nRussia. Germany gets 30%. \nCross asset correlations outside of the US are increasing past few days - eg copper and the Turkish lira hourly charts are on top of each \nother past 4 days. I'm worried there is a 30-40pct(?) chance of a hard risk off move in markets in first half of next week - more focused \non European equities, copper, EM FX (Turkey, ZAR, Ruble etc) than SPX. In that scenario oil is way up. \nExchange WTI calls - there are 2 options (as of 3pm est): \n5day expiry 17march 2014 underlying clj4 97.92 \nand \n35d expiry 16apri12014 underlying clk4 97.59 \n The 5 day options are a bit short - one possibility is sell a 3usd out of the money put (95.5 strike) for 20cents and buy a 2usd OTM \n100 call for 25. Net pay Scents. But 5d is a bit short for me. \nFor 35d expiry You could look at selling 91.50 (6usd OTM put) for 56cents and buying 103c (5.5usd OTM) for 58cents or the 102c \n(4.5usd OTM) for 76cents. \nCL1 <comdty> OMON on Bloomberg has live strikes and bid/ask. \nIf 5d is too short and 35d is too long / not enough gamma, Tazia may be able to source liquidity from the street. Am Cc'ing her for any \nlive pricing or additional comment \nBest \nNay"}, {"sender": "Vinit Sahni", "recipients": ["[email protected]", "Paul Morris"], "timestamp": "03/13/2014 09:47 PM EDT", "subject": "Fw: Oil options", "body": "Jeffrey - apologise if this long to execute next time well be much quicker."}, {"sender": "Paul Morris [1111111111111111110111114111111111114]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "3/14/2014 10:27:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Oil options [C]", "body": "I do want to talk to u about this, they spent too much thinking about options here, let me know when u have couple minutes."}]	3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032725.txt_21381	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032725.txt	Re: Term Sheet	[{"sender": "Greg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 10:07 PM", "subject": "Term Sheet", "body": "Hi Jeff,\n\nI realize the last term sheet was a draft, my fault (my computer syne’d the draft with the same name).\n\nHere is a correct version, the last page is the signature page. It would be great if I could get this back tomorrow. Nothing is due until the recap is complete, hopefully in about 4 weeks. I am planning to start those discussions the end of next week.\n\nThings are going well. The more I learn the more excited I get. I will be at Tarana tomorrow discussing a window mount version to try to get to self-install. 1gbps in a self-install package would be the last step.\n\nWe will only need a tower ever 4-5km in the city, which is basically 2 or 3 rooftops for all of Boston. I met with American Tower today (I know their CEO and CTO) and they have plenty of room on the John Hancock.\n\nFun Stuff and great to be doing something together!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Jan 25, 2018, at 4:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Term Sheet", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn rr", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "1/29/2018 2:39:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Term Sheet", "body": "Not sure if realistic but trump may impact 5g and not sure if net positive or negative for this potential investment.\n\nhttps://www.cnbe.com/2018/01/28/trump-administration-could-build-nationalized-5 g-mobile-network.html"}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029575.txt_21392	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029575.txt	Re: invitation	[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed. \nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to \nAustralia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next \ntime you're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar \nthemes to Lolita in that it's about a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a young \ngirl. \nThank you for this help with Serena. I'm so sorry about what happened with WA. I will keep the \"bootleg\" \nepisode and hope to release someday. It's so good, and he was so kind to read the poem with me and you \nwere so kind to make it happen. \nLisa"}, {"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 6:56 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey, \nHow's this"}, {"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "count how many times you say I or me?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 8:06 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "okay.... let me revise with I and me in mind before I talk to you. \nCan I call you tomorrow am?"}, {"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "11/26/2018 2:40:00 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Yes"}]	6
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028775.txt_21397	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028775.txt	FW: RE : RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade	[{"sender": "Bob Crowe [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "3/11/2016 12:24:18 PM", "subject": "FW: RE : RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": ""}, {"sender": "abuulabass", "recipients": ["Vinoda Basnayake", "elisabeth feliho"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 02, 2016 12:31 PM", "subject": "RE : RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Congratulations Vinoda ! The French version of the paper was published today in the Senegalese major newspapers. You can see it also in Seneweb.com .\n\nMany thanks for the good work with my best regards.\n\nTidiane"}, {"sender": "Vinoda Basnayake", "recipients": ["elisabeth feliho"], "timestamp": "02/03/2016 16:20 (GMT+00:00)", "subject": "RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "We have had some positive feedback from the article. Now the issue certainly has more visibility in Washington. Bob is in the process of setting up the meeting with Tom at the State Dept regarding the Human Rights Report for 2016. Will send more as we get more details.\n\nVinoda"}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032272.txt_21409	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032272.txt	RE:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke", "Kathy Ruemmler", "Miller, Michael"], "timestamp": "Thursday, July 07, 2016 8:12 AM", "subject": "RE: ", "body": "https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow"}, {"sender": "Miller, Micha", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "7/7/2016 1:04:06 PM", "subject": "RE: ", "body": "Thank you, Jeffrey. Mike"}]	2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033178.txt_21414	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033178.txt	News	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "10/19/2016 6:25:58 PM", "subject": "News", "body": "Hi Jeffrey ! ! \nThank you for writing. I'm doing well. Looking forward for winter season in the Alps! \nI have from Zurich as assistant for you. I sent you her photos once :) lives in New Jersey \nnow and in Paris!! \nI have some new ones here in zurich but not in NY or Paris yet. \nHow is it going with Zubair? \nDo you believe Trump will win or Hilary ? \nI miss Berkeley so much. This California lifestyle was magical. Can't wait to be back for 2nd semester C) \nI plan to pass NY or California bar and be attorney in USA. I love America and the win mentality in your \ncountry. \nKind regards,"}]	1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032876.txt_21420	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032876.txt	Re: Hi from London	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["ee"], "timestamp": "6/22/2016 10:36:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Hi from London", "body": "no worry"}, {"sender": "i i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Hi from London", "body": "Hi Jeffrey!\n\nI'm so sorry to hear about the Trump law suit. I wish there was something I could do. I always think of you.\n\nAll my love always,"}]	2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031679.txt_21424	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031679.txt	null	[{"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "12/13/2018 10:01:57 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Federal prosecutors are investigating whether U.S. President Donald Trump's inaugural\ncommittee misspent some of the funds it raised, the Wall Street Journal reported on\n\nThursday, citing people familiar with the matter.\n\nThe probe opened by the Manhattan U.S. attorney's office is examining whether some of the committee's donors\ngave money in exchange for policy concessions, influencing administration positions or access to the incoming\n\nadministration, the"}]	1
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025927.txt_21425	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025927.txt	Re: Gingrich view of Trump	[{"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Agree"}, {"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 9, 2016 17:01:58", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "And I believe we have a problem"}, {"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 4:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "I openly and proudly support Trump.\n\nI've actually been able to pull people away from Hillary by saying I'd ONLY vote for Trump or Sanders.\nCiting they everyone else is establishment politics. I convinced a lesbian woman, older, to consider Trump\nafter she went on a rampage about him. It just shows, people HAVE NO IDEA what they are talking about.\nMedia holds the cards.... people are sheep."}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Agree. Funny, I too have been saying Trump or Bern. Get Hillary the hell out. She’s shameless!"}]	4
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032370.txt_21426	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032370.txt	Re: Trump	[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Any further intel on Treasury? Priebus choice suggests to me that he may go for a bigger name in treasury than Mnuchin. Someone to underscore/push forward this notion that he is Reagan 2.0 (as some are suggesting). I am just not sure who that person would be. The Trump trade certainly seems to have legs -- all the Hillary loving hedgies I am talking to are congratulating themselves for making so much money last week. They are all Trump lovers now!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:53 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "no intel but lots of profits"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Mace", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 2:54:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "do you agree with my thesis?"}]	3
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022943.txt_21431	IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022943.txt	boies	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "11/7/2017 10:35:08 AM", "subject": "boies", "body": "http://people.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-mcgowan/\n\nright on time, i didnt know. boies is hisco counsel. . represents ME that claims that al gore ,\nand clinton were both on the island. he knows its not true , or could clearly ask hif former clients."}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032358.txt_21443	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032358.txt	RE:	[{"sender": "Miller, Michael", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:28:58 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Michael C. Miller\nPartner\nwww.steptoe.com/mmiller\n\nSteptoe\n\ndirect Steptoe & Johnson LLP\nfax 1114 Avenue of the Americas\ncell New York, NY 10036\n\nwww.steptoe.com"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Miller, Michael"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 10, 2016 4:55 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031299.txt_21445	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031299.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 2, 2018, at 7:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.marketwatch.com/story/new-york-launches-tax-investigation-into-trump-after-ny-times-report-2018-10-02"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis <1>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 9:18 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will call u later"}, {"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 3, 2018, at 11:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["J <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "10/3/2018 3:10:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "In DC finalizing"}]	4
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033150.txt_21452	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033150.txt	null	[{"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "6/1/2019 10:45:53 PM", "subject": null, "body": "https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/446491-trump-announces-departure-of-white-house-lawyer-emmet-flood"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026083.txt_21455	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026083.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 9:35 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "much to do around the trump trip. I hope you are enjoying."}, {"sender": "<IMMIIIIIMIMI>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017 at 9:17 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "any tips on how we should communicate with him?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 10:25 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "it depends on which subject. . economic. military, tech?"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:23 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how about the war in yemen?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 11:25 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i will ask, get back to you tomorw"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:27 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "very well many thnx and here is a refrence:\nKUNA : Yemeni FM: We are ready to go back to peace talks - Politics - 05/05/2017"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 15, 2017, at 12:20 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "what would your emir like to see happen from the US ? concrete please. yemen will be part of a saudi \nmeeting. they said they will have someone pass by my house tom afternoon, email you after. how much fun"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "5/14/2017 9:38:47 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "a good word about the Amir's effort to host the yemen peace talk will be great, i think.. and if peace agreement \nwas signed in kuwait that would be 414141414141e"}]	8
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032692.txt_21460	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032692.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I know -- have been reading it. Good old MW. You still talk to him?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yup"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Land A", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 7:12:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No doubt he and DT know each other well too. Have to say, he is looking/sounding increasingly unhinged -- are you tempted to take any money off the table in the markets?"}]	4
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033144.txt_21466	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033144.txt	null	[{"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn", "Darren lndyke"], "timestamp": "5/13/2019 8:36:29 PM", "subject": null, "body": "trump goin to lutniks house on thurs"}]	1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029325.txt_21467	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029325.txt	Re: Jeffrey Epstein, Harvard and Science Magnate, Applauds Congress' Largest Bill for Melanoma - CNBC	[{"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith", "[email protected]"], "timestamp": "3/20/2014 2:46:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Jeffrey Epstein, Harvard and Science Magnate, Applauds Congress' Largest Bill for Melanoma - CNBC", "body": "We are pushing to help get this up but having Bill Clinton in the other is making it tough to pop anything other up. Check again in 8 hours"}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 20, 2014, at 9:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Jeffrey Epstein, Harvard and Science Magnate, Applauds Congress' Largest Bill for Melanoma - CNBC", "body": "Hi Tyler,\n\nSee the press release published this morning. Everyone's picking it up but don't see it on googles list page yet. Tough because Daily Mail has about 3 new articles out\n\nhttp://ww.cnbc.com/id/101510498"}]	2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028985.txt_21469	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028985.txt	America's Shadow: The Real Secret of Donald J. Trump - SFGate by Deepak Chopra	[{"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "8/8/2016 8:57:31 AM", "subject": "America's Shadow: The Real Secret of Donald J. Trump - SFGate by Deepak Chopra", "body": "Since Woody was into the subconscious mind \| thought I’d share this\nSee you at 3PM\nhttp://www.sfgate.com/opinion/chopra/article/America-s-Shadow-The-Real-Secret-of-Donald-J-7965248.ph"}]	1
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016692.txt_21477	IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016692.txt	Re: Russian House	[{"sender": "John Page", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, May 04, 2009 5:23:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Russian House", "body": "Mayor:\n\nHappy to help. The address is 515 N. County Road.\n\nJP"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "05/04/2009 04:28 PM", "subject": "Russian House", "body": "JP: What is the address of the former Trump mansion on North Ocean purchased by the Russian?\n\nMM"}]	2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033201.txt_21483	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033201.txt	Trump	[{"sender": "Alireza Ittihadich", "recipients": ["JEFF EPSTEIN [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "12/5/2016 6:44:28 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "Lor\n: <F\nMs\ni\nong\now,\n~\n4th\n.\n*\nV-BR"}]	1
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026221.txt_21490	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026221.txt	Plane management	[{"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "10/2/2017 9:17:38 PM", "subject": "RE: Plane management", "body": "On our to-do list, but back of the envelope, we satisfied ourselves that after depreciation, we would show a profit. (In part because Apollo charter payments factor in depreciation.)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 5:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "did anyone provide you with a biz plan that shows the proposal will generat a profit ?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Adding Internet and possibly changing cushions. I recommended we do it with the 4 year inspection in the spring, but haven’t heard back from him. I think I talked him out of automating the divans. I agreed with what you said about that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "isnt he changing the cushions? etc and adding internet?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Ah yes."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "new depreciation rules proposed under trump"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "GV is in inspection and going well. Not sure what renovations you mean?\n\nOn depreciation, we think we cannot use accelerated due to foreign travel preponderance, and obviously can’t use bonus because not new. We think we are stuck with straight-line depreciation which will be passive.\n\nAre you saying that Jet vs. EJM could hinge on the type of plane usage? Not sure I follow that."}]	7
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016801.txt_21492	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016801.txt	Capital Market Outlook	[{"sender": "Paul Morris <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "7/2/2019 4:24:45 PM", "subject": "Capital Market Outlook", "body": "Capital Market Outlook from our Chief Investment Office delivers a balanced mix of macroeconomic insights and global market views, with in-depth analysis from the CIO's investment strategists and analysts. It offers timely commentary that can help you navigate markets and take advantage of emerging trends across the globe.\n\nThis week's topics are:\n• Macro Strategy: Why 2%? — While Federal Reserve policy has always been focused on the goal of price stability, the specific meaning of price stability has been refined over the years from a general and non-specified, vague concept to the current very specific quantitative definition of a 2% long-run average for the personal consumption expenditures deflator. We describe the evolution and rationale for the more specific target.\n• Global Market View: Global R&D: From Apollo, to Apple, to Alibaba? — The recent unfolding tech cold war between the U.S. and China will likely only accelerate the pace of spending on global research and development as the two parties vie for technological supremacy. China faces significant technological hurdles, while the U.S. needs to rethink and rebalance the role of public and private sector research and development spending.\n• Thought of the Week: A Golden Diversifier — Gold's recent outperformance versus the U.S. dollar has potentially triggered a bullish technical pattern. In our view, the market's expectation for looser monetary policy together with recent comments by President Trump implying a desire for a weaker greenback have been tailwinds. In addition to these drivers, we view gold as an appealing diversifier in light of elevated geopolitical risks. However, a comprehensive trade deal between the U.S. and China would likely constitute a more significant headwind for the yellow metal.\n\nFind out more in this edition of Capital Market Outlook, and feel free to contact us with any questions you have about our market views.\n\nSincerely,\nPaul"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029429.txt_21494	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029429.txt	Fwd: A message on the Trump Administration Proposal on Indirect Costs	[{"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "7/7/2017 12:05:21 PM", "subject": "Fwd: A message on the Trump Administration Proposal on Indirect Costs", "body": "FYI"}, {"sender": "Maria T. Zuber", "recipients": ["all-research@mitedu"], "timestamp": "July 6, 2017 at 12:27:05 PM EDT", "subject": "A message on the Trump Administration Proposal on Indirect Costs", "body": "Dear colleagues,\n\nWe are writing to alert you to an issue that threatens all of MIT's federally funded research activities but that is often underappreciated.\n\nWe're referring to the Trump Administration's proposal to put a 10 percent cap on indirect cost reimbursements to universities by the\nNational Institutes of Health — an idea that is already beginning to be talked about for other federal agencies as well.\n\nAn article explaining indirect costs and why they are important to MIT can be found in the most recent Faculty\nNewsletter: http://web.mit.edu/fnl/volume/295/zuber.html.\n\nThe Administration's proposed cuts to federal R&D agency budgets have rightly been met with consternation on campus. The indirect\ncost cap proposal is actually an even graver danger because it is easier for the government to institute, and it would do far-reaching\ndamage that is harder to reverse. We need faculty and research staff to understand the devastating effects that capping indirect cost\nwould cause to MIT and other research institutions.\n\nThe indirect cost cap is easier to implement than a cut to the budget because the Administration can act unilaterally without\nCongressional approval. The proposed agency budget cuts are already running into strong headwinds on both sides of the aisle in\nCongress, and they cannot move forward without 60 votes in the U.S. Senate. The indirect cost cap, by contrast, does not attract the\nsame level of attention because it is not well understood, and the Administration can simply impose a cap — at a single agency, or at all\nof them (since indirect cost reimbursement is fairly uniform across the government now).\n\nWhat would a 10 percent cap mean for MIT? A 10 percent cap on all federal agencies would cost MIT around $100 million a year. To\nput that in context, the financial crisis of 2008, where we saw a significant decline in endowment, required us to reduce spending by this\nsame order of magnitude. Fortunately, the recovery of the endowment was relatively quick, and we were able to recoup some of that\nloss. In this case, the 10 percent cap is unlikely to be altered in the foreseeable future. Since this is a recurring cost, attempting to\nrecover this in the future through endowment payout would require on the order of an additional $2.6B in endowment. These indirect cost\nfunds partially reimburse MIT for upkeep of research buildings and equipment, and literally keeping the lights and heating and cooling\nsystems on. A portion of the money also pays administrative costs required to implement federal regulations and to provide staff who\nhelp apply for and monitor federal grants.\n\nA cap on indirect costs would directly affect research and researchers. If MIT failed to receive the federal funds needed to operate\nresearch infrastructure, we would need to limit the number of federal grants that the Institute accepts. It would be necessary to\nintroduce a process analogous to under-recovery of foundation proposals to identify the indirect costs to support each federal grant.\nWhile we would seek other ways to raise revenues, we would also need to cut other expenditures (e.g., through layoffs, salary freezes,\netc.), reduce the use of research facilities to cut operating costs, and/or to allow facilities to deteriorate. All of our peer institutions are\nconsidering similar steps. In short, a cut to indirect costs is a cut to research funding. And it's a cut that's more difficult to handle than a\ndecision by a federal agency not to fund a particular project in a given year.\n\nThe percentage of federal research funding that goes to indirect costs has remained relatively steady for decades, and there has been\na federal cap on administrative costs since the 1990s. The Administration may hope that a proposed cap on indirect costs is seen as\nmitigating the impact of their proposed 22% reduction of the NIH budget. Although it may obscure this impact, in reality it will worsen\nit. The Administration is claiming that a cut to indirect costs will not cut research, but in truth without indirect cost recovery, academic\ninstitutions, including MIT, will not be able to afford to support current levels of federal grants.\n\nThe MIT administration is working on this matter with the urgency that it deserves. Let us be clear that no one on campus should be\nblasé or unconcerned about the proposal to cap indirect costs. Capping these costs will negatively impact every researcher at MIT.\n\nPlease let us know if you have any questions or comments. We will keep you informed as this situation evolves.\n\nSincerely,\nMartin A. Schmidt\nMaria T. Zuber"}]	2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033567.txt_21503	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033567.txt	DC attorney general subpoenas Trump’s inaugural committee	[{"sender": "Nicholas Rib <i", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "2/28/2019 3:03:20 PM", "subject": "DC attorney general subpoenas Trump’s inaugural committee", "body": "https://nypost.com/2019/02/27/dc-attorney-general-subpoenas-trumps-inaugural-committee/?utm_campaign=iosapp&utm_source=message_app"}]	1