Split (1)

train · 5.08k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

thread_id stringlengths 37 43	source_file stringlengths 35 37	subject stringlengths 0 231 ⌀	messages stringlengths 88 34.9k	message_count int64 1 42
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029692.txt_23451	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029692.txt	null	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/14/2013 8:47:12 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Article 1.\n\nWashington Post\n\nObama to make first trip to Israel, part of a potential new beginning with region.\n\nPresident Obama will travel to Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories next month to make an early second-term push for peace negotiations between two divided governments and to assess the broader political developments remaking the Middle East.\n\nIt will be Obama’s first trip as president to Israel, where suspicions run high in the aftermath of his unsuccessful early efforts at Middle East peacemaking.\n\nThe choice of destination — one that Obama avoided in his first term — suggests a revival of his ambitions abroad after a year of virtual dormancy on foreign affairs. The timing also points to a willingness on his part to quickly reengage a politically volatile foreign-"}]	1
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019339.txt_23452	IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019339.txt	Re: Fw: 9th circle	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, 23 Jul 2018 01:51:58 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "9th circle"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon <q", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon the European: He’s opening the populist fort in Brussels\n\nThe former Trump strategist arrives in Europe with \"The Movement\". Objective: an alliance\nbetween right-wing leaders, from Salvini to Orban in view of the 2019 elections\n\nNEW YORK. The invasion of Europe has begun. Steve Bannon, 65, the American far-right guru\nwho was Donald Trump’s right-hand man in the White House — but let go last summer following\nthe racist violence in Charlottesville — is preparing to march on Brussels. Launching, he told the\nDaily Beast himself, a new non-profit foundation called The Movement, (Il Movimento), right in\nthe heart of Europe and its institutions. Through which he hopes to coordinate the populist right in\nview of the European elections which will be held in spring 2019.\n\nObjective: to compete with George Soros, the American billionaire of Hungarian origin, benefactor\nof the Democratic party, who since 1984 with his Open Society has spent at least $32 billion in\nsupport of NGOs dealing with human rights. And for this he became the bogeyman of the populist\nright, accused of plots of all kinds: including that of wanting to replace Italians with immigrants in\norder to have labour at low cost. A mantra repeated in the past on Twitter also by the current\nMinister of the Interior Matteo Salvini.\n\nThe ambition of Steve Bannon, former director of the alt-right American site Breitbart — which in\nthe European campaign preceded him since the platform had already opened bureaux in London\nand Rome — is therefore to become the coordinator of the one great “populist international” of\nwhich he has long since been dreaming.\n\nThe Movement, in fact, intends to function as an extreme right-wing think tank: a source of\nstrategic advice to channel the not-so-politically structured discontent of the most extreme\nEuropean movements. Analysing data and giving strategic advice. But also by raising funds and\nchanneling funding.\n\nThe aim is to create a populist alliance, a sort of “super group” that if victorious can conquer up to a\nthird of the European Parliament in the elections next May.\n\nIndeed — putting the common policy of the Old Continent in the hands of Bannon and his own.\n\nThe American strategist is very attached to the Freedom Caucus — the extreme right of the US\nCongress — and in 2014 he was at the top of the Cambridge Analytica company, which in 2016"}, {"sender": "Benjamin Harwell", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 22 Jul 2018 22:01:54 +0200", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}]	3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031494.txt_23457	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031494.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "David Schoen", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "Any thoughts on the guy?\n\nMeanwhile, I hope all is going well for you now and I wish you a happy and healthy new year.\n\nDavid Schoen"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Feb 22, 2010 5:09 pm", "subject": "Re:", "body": "the strange person is"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "As terrible as the system is and has been to you, I have to tell you one encouraging thing. Last Friday I spoke on a panel in DC on the justice system. I was seated next to Justice Breyer and got to know him a bit. For what it is worth, he certainly seem to understand that the system is broken and I hear this more and more. Indeed, he made it very clear that he thinks the sentencing system (which he helped form as a member of the Sentencing Commission) is broken and while you are past having to deal with that, I would like to think this raises some hope that the rest of the system will improve if others in his position feel the same.\n\nTomorrow I go to Alabama to argue before the court of appeals regarding the constitutionality of Alabama's Community Notification Act, which the lower court struck down as unconstitutional already. Ultra right wing court and election year, so who knows; but these laws are so Draconian.\n\nI saw that the U.S. Attorney's office is appearing in your civil cases as well. Some strange folks in that office. Anyway, I will look forward to talking and while all the judges are going to be tough, Judges Marra and Johnson so far have not been rubber stamps for government in my case and that means something.\n\nDavid"}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012685.txt_23459	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012685.txt	RE: Oscar diary	[{"sender": "Stephanie [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "3/4/2011 11:15:40 PM", "subject": "RE: Oscar diary", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nPeggy's story is attached to the e-mail. I have included the story in the body of the e-mail as well.\n\nThanks,\nStephanie"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Stephanie"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 6:12 PM", "subject": "Oscar diary", "body": "Send to jeffrey"}]	2
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023126.txt_23468	IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023126.txt	Acosta plea deal in Epstein sex case defended by former aide \| Miami Herald	[{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["[email protected]", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "5/10/2019 11:01:49 PM", "subject": "Acosta plea deal in Epstein sex case defended by former aide \| Miami Herald", "body": "https://www.miamiherald.com/latest-news/article226168500.html\n\nTop aide of Jeffrey Epstein\nprosecutor Acosta: We acted with\nintegrity\n\nFebruary 15, 2019 12:17 PM\n\nPalm Beach multimillionaire Jeffrey Epstein is a free man, despite sexually abusing\ndozens of underage girls according to police and prosecutors. His victims have never\nhad a voice, until now. By Emily Michot \| Julie K. Brown\n\nA former top prosecutor involved in the Jeffrey Epstein sex case is defending his old\nboss, Alexander Acosta, whose decision to craft a secret plea deal with the wealthy\nNew York hedge fund manager has come under federal scrutiny.\n\nIn his first public comments on the 10-year-old case, Jeffrey H. Sloman — who at\nthe time was second in command under Acosta at the U.S. Attorney’s Office in"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033395.txt_23474	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033395.txt	Re: Slowing economy could increase pressure on Big Tech - Axios	[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 10:20 AM", "subject": "Re: Slowing economy could increase pressure on Big Tech - Axios", "body": "What do we think of this?\nhttps://www.axios.com/recession-threat-2019-regulatory-risk-google-facebook-amazon-b8966b22-57dc-426c-9f4f-5526982383c7.html"}, {"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "12/4/2018 3:41:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Slowing economy could increase pressure on Big Tech - Axios", "body": "easy and beneficial for you. . I will try to negotiate am automkoatic reset if.. such and such and so and so."}]	2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032060.txt_23480	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032060.txt	null	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren lndyke"], "timestamp": "10/11/2016 3:50:20 AM", "subject": null, "body": "http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/high-profile-casey-anthony-attorney-now-representing-jane-doe-in-trump-rape-lawsuit/"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031319.txt_23482	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031319.txt	Re: Duke Buchan III	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon [i"], "timestamp": "11/18/2016 6:27:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Duke Buchan III", "body": "nope"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Duke Buchan III", "body": "This guy apparently is constantly texting Trump/Trump. Have you heard of him?\n\nhttp://hginvestors.com/?page_id=10\n\nLandon Thomas, Jr.\nFinancial Reporter\nNew York Times\n\nhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon_ jr thomas/index."}]	2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030761.txt_23486	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030761.txt	Re: Question	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Linda Stone [as"], "timestamp": "11/19/2016 5:09:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Question", "body": "its fine. will be fun"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 12:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Question", "body": "I'm not sure it's safe long term or a good option to live in the US for a Trump/Pence presidency with Bannon as\na key advisor.\n\nAm I wrong? The hate, anti-semitism (swastikas painted all over the park a few blocks from me), and \"His\"\n\ndesire to be Putin.... All super concerning.\nXX\n\nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}]	2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029679.txt_23489	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029679.txt	null	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "10/24/2012 4:58:47 PM", "subject": null, "body": "have one of your cronys ask to see the mortgage to mara lago\n\ncash from electricinas union,, (his driver MAtt\n\nwas the bag man, later made an exec at the public co. ) and the 30 milllion dollar loan from the casino to donald\n\ntrump. backdated,\n\nDo ee ee ee ee ee i ee ee a"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032706.txt_23490	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032706.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Now being reported that Trump's lawyers sent a letter to MW's publisher demanding that they not publish the book."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:31 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Forwarded message"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2018 3:55:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes"}]	3
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030328.txt_23494	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030328.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 5:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "happy chanukah. . - has anyone in the past made a linguistic model that used fields instead of\ndefinitions. similar toa magnet field. to some degree. there is no one vector that describes the word but\na field of them. home surrounded by a field of definitions. not based on 3 d space but based on context\none could integrate over the field. see smoothness. strength , change.. not sure itis useful. but\nhaving fun"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 9:59 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "For word meanings, the closest I can think of to something like this is an array of meaning postulates, in\nCarnap's sense, something that Jerry Fodor for one has toyed with. Multidimensional, but not a field. I don't\nsee how to work it out, or to extend it to the interpretations of longer units."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 12:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "one of donalds closet people said that remember , he has written three books. . which makes him one of the\nfew people in the world that has written more books than he has read"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "12/26/2016 6:56:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I read what his ghost-writer said about him. Pretty scary.\n\nReminds me of something I was told by Jon Snow, one of England's most sensible newsmen. He was with the\npress entourage accompanying Tony Blair on his visit to Saudi Arabia, and walking around one of the palaces\none day, he saw Blair sitting in a room with a book in his lap, which greatly surprised him -- until he came over\nto talk. It was the New Testament.\n\nAnd then Blair started telling about how delighted he and Cheri were with the gold door handles,....\n\nI notice that your prediction was right about Trump's avoiding the White House as far too primitive. Must be\ndriving the Secret Service up the wall.\n\nI'll keep in mind what you say about Trump's tweets, but they are hard to ignore. Whatever he may think,\nothers here and abroad can't help considering the meaning of the words, and take action accordingly.\n\nAbout meaning, It's not clear to me how to distinguish the meaning of \"New York\" (however it is correctly\nspecified) from the concept. Still don't see how to work out field models.\n\nNoam"}]	4
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033418.txt_23495	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033418.txt	Fwd:	[{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "11/20/2018 6:36:39 PM", "subject": "Fwd: ", "body": "Think no response for a while probably appropriate. \nJust had lunch w \nIs trump getting crazier as many of my pals think or is it steady crazy."}, {"sender": "Keyu Jin", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "November 20, 2018 at 12:46:35 PM EST", "subject": "Fwd: ", "body": "Did RA come back with answers to the yellow highlighted? did you take a look at the section that was written \nup? apart from your revision of intro there was the first section."}]	2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032712.txt_23496	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032712.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 12:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "he in keeping with past tradtion said he would confirm a time around 11 . no word since. . the example you \nmight use, was when john mccain was grilling comey, and made some really weird statements everone \nlooked at each other, with a \" what is going on: \" look, it turned out to be a brain tumor. . eveyone looks \nnow with the same , WTF , look, at trump but has no idea what the future holds."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "1/8/2018 5:11:15 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Perfect. You should ping SB. He has some weird ADD thing. You remind him tho and he sometimes clicks \nback into plan."}]	2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030775.txt_23500	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030775.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Michael Wo!ft a"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:38 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how was it.? why dont you stop by today so we can script tomorrow. - assuming no change. . prefer no details on email"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All good. I am everybody's darling. Have to keep reminding people that I am actually quite unpopular. Apparently thing of the past--for now (excepting among a small circle of journalists). Ira Rosen, a 60 Minutes producer and a friend of Bannon's, came with a message from SB: \"You own me a few million.\" Rosen also says he believes SB now weighing the strategy of making a formal and public break with Trump. I can't get together today because I have to leave for DC at 11AM to speak to 800 book buyers (not to mention pre-signing 800 books). Then tomorrow AM to LA to do Bill Maher show. Making money is hard work,"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great. Im thrilled for you. At the moment he’s coming tomorrow night"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon's \"nationalist-populist” platform is coherent, rational, and, apparently appealing to a great many people. I can't see why at this point he wouldn't want to use his world-stage stature to make an argument for it and to claim leadership of it. What does he have to lose? What else is there, except to suck up to Trump, and get the chance to be manhandled by him again?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Michael Wo!ft a"], "timestamp": "1/18/2018 2:12:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "we discussed what color shirt he should wear at the hearing. :)/. as you recognize there is the one major inflection point. . congress has begun the long process of trying to get answers from him. . invitation. subpoena. future contempt. wh responding . executirve privlege. . special counsel rules different but either very short or very long."}]	5
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031325.txt_23510	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031325.txt	null	[{"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "2/25/2019 7:25:08 PM", "subject": null, "body": ""}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033342.txt_23511	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033342.txt	PBI	[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "2/3/2019 9:53:52 PM", "subject": "PBI", "body": "spoke to TSA at Palm Bch Atlantic, \nOnce the President departs Palm Beach area, the TFR (temporary flight restriction) is lifted, \nwe should be able to land in RBI., \ncurrently the TFR expires at 10:30pm„ the superbowl is typically 3 hours long, it starts at 6:30pm„ \nOnly a guess, Trump will leave around 10pm is my guess."}]	1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030472.txt_23513	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030472.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 9:34:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:40:36 -0800", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance\nhttp://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html\n\nby Vicky Ward\nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n\n“I’ve got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I’ve just been.\nYou will never think the same way about anything again.”\n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up\neverywhere at the moment as the alleged “procurer” of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of\nanother investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with\nallegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British\nnewspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein’s friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to\npublicly disassociate himself from his old pal.\n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” It was largely a business piece that\nfocused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les\nWexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude\nHoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of\n$450 million.\n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein’s great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women\nwith whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn’t really go there, focusing instead on the\nissue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.\n\nThis is not to say I didn’t hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I\nconcentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same\nones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one\ncase, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know: Who\nis she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fairstory\nthat really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself.\n\nBizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept\nrunning into both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of\nyoung women with him who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. “Do they speak?” I remember\nasking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He laughed. “Not like you, Vicky,” was his riposte."}]	2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033424.txt_23519	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033424.txt	G550	[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [[email protected]]", "Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "12/18/2018 3:21:16 AM", "subject": "G550", "body": "Pete informs the new spoilers board install going well, should be return to service late wed evening, or Noon Thursday at the latest.,they are painting the white underside this evening, Blue upper surface tomorrow and clear coat wed morn.\n\nPresident Trump arrives Friday at 4:30pm ish.\n\nShould Dave and Darren move the G550 to Boca Thursday?\n\nThx\nLarry"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022949.txt_23521	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022949.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:42 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://people.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-mcgowan/ the same boies that represents________________ who makes totally fabricated claims re gore and clinton - boies clients, he refuses to ask them their version of events. They were never on the island and though she gave details of a dinnner. I have never ever met al gore or his wife. boies is going to be in the fining line, from the biz view he represented Hank Greenburg AIG„ his fees were never paid as the appeals court overturned the win. but AIG as an insurance co. -- ... phone only"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:26 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i am more interested in al-waleed/saudi purge/Jared axis. al-waleed and prez go back a ways don't they?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:55 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "As they are both bulkshitters"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:00 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Did your Saudi friends survive the purge?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:10 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "All. With gods help;)"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Boies, Voila.", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2o17/n/o7/business/weinstein-lawyer-david-boies.html. Unclear to me why he is getting involved with you...."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "11/8/2017 1:49:52 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "MONEY!!!! he lost the fee for hank greenburg, and needed money for his firm. if you look into boies and AIG you will find the answer"}]	7
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031443.txt_23528	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031443.txt	High Profile	[{"sender": "Jamie Rosenwald", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:07 PM", "subject": "High Profile", "body": "congratulate you on your wonderful financial successes since your days as\nmy Physics prof at Dalton!! The young, bright options trader, who\nunderstood Black Sholes and how to use it, at Bear, made good! !\n\nUnless your PR advisor is Donald Trump, I am not sure that current press\nprovides you with much benefit. Perhaps I am wrong? Not the first time! !\n\nAnyway, middle age has brought its own unique set of challenges. Aging\ncertainly ain’t for sissys.\n\nPs. David Asch and I toasted to you during our Thanksgiving weekend in\nAmagansett in November."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:12 PM", "subject": "High Profile", "body": "thanks, what is david doing?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "High Profile", "body": ""}]	3
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026491.txt_23535	IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026491.txt	Re: Fwd: Re:	[{"sender": "\"Grossman, Andrew M\" <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "June 23, 2018 at 12:56:55 AM EDT", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Mueller’s Fruit of the Poisonous Tree"}, {"sender": "\"Rivkin, David\" <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "June 23, 2018 at 8:14:49 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Here it is."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 2:44 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Big deal"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 23, 2018, at 12:01 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: Re:", "body": "ihtink weak thoughts?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 7:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: Re:", "body": "Yawn. And David Rivkin is a hack. Zero — and I mean zero — chance that a court would find a due process violation on these facts. Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine does not apply."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "6/23/2018 5:25:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: Re:", "body": "exactly my view. on facebook I thought you might look at the recent internet and privacy opinions and pose some open questions. to be discussed . mark wants to bring the internet to the rest of the world.. and healthcare. . his wife is nice but boring.. what do you see as the challegnes what does she or he see.\n\nsocial"}]	6
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030749.txt_23536	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030749.txt	null	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["G Maxwell"], "timestamp": "Saturday, 10 January 2015 09:12", "subject": null, "body": "inital respone, too many unanswerd question raised, realtionship with jeffrey/ , ? you and clinton? her and andrew? whats the deal here? why is she there . this is whoiam, this how i know jeffrey, employed from ,, to.. . I was aware that jeffrey hired masag people, I sometine hired them, she was one of them. recolletion empllyed , firmative.. what. I am writing to writin to respond to the alleagtinoin that have been made whcich are categoricly untrue.. during hte time 1 met mr derhsowiz , in general inviting a subpeona .? you will never answer questions to the press satisfaction they will not be persuaded. the --"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031457.txt_23538	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031457.txt	Re: Trump	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, at 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "would you like photso of donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen."}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015 at 5:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes!!!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015 at 4:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "hawain tropic girl"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, 8 December 2015", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Do you mind if I pass Petrella's contact on to a political reporter? I won't do it unless you say OK\nbecause after that I would have no say as to where story goes. Let me know -- its not a big deal for\nme either way. But at some point this stuff will come out -- as long he continues to top polls."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Pass on midelfart wealthiest girl in Norway"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 11:08:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Maybe I will wait for the pics in your kitchen:)"}]	6
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016480.txt_23541	IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016480.txt	Motion to Unseal Epstein Appeal Briefs	[{"sender": "Maksim Nemtsev <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Browning, Jack <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, December 26, 2018 10:33 AM", "subject": "Motion to Unseal Epstein Appeal Briefs", "body": "Hi Jack,\n\nAttached is a draft Stipulation to adjourn the return date to January 7, 2019. Answering papers will be due January 4 and reply papers will be due January 6.\n\nWe are also enlisting the assistance of local counsel to sponsor Marty's pro hac vice petition. We will provide you with copies of the motion papers once they are prepared.\n\nLet me know if you have any questions. Happy Holidays.\n\nThank you,\n\nMax Nemtsev"}, {"sender": "Browning, Jack <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Maksim Nemtsev <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, December 26, 2018 12:19 PM", "subject": "RE: Motion to Unseal Epstein Appeal Briefs", "body": "Maksim,\n\nPlease find attached a copy of the stipulation with some minor edits, which you can go ahead and file/serve. If you do ultimately file an opposition, please serve us with copies via email.\n\nBest regards and happy holidays,\n\nJack"}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Browning, Jack <[email protected]>", "Maksim Nemtsev <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 27, 2018 8:55 AM", "subject": "RE: Motion to Unseal Epstein Appeal Briefs", "body": "Jack, my local counsel in NY (we are filing for pro hac vice) has advised that the Court Clerk may require a signature on the Stipulaion. Out of an abundance of caution, can you sign and return and we will file today. Thanks, Marty"}]	3
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029889.txt_23544	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029889.txt	FW: Jane Doe	[{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Robert D. Critton Jr.", "Jack Goldberger", "Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "8/11/2009 7:16:00 PM", "subject": "FW: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:19 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Trump has been moved to Sept. 24."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:00 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Please let me know when u do."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:55 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Yes — we are still trying to get the details though"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}]	5
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033430.txt_23545	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033430.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, February 20, 2019 2:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/20/ex-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-gets-prison-surrender-date-delayed-two-months-to-may-6.html"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "2/21/2019 1:51:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is she in dc today or tomorrow?"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030381.txt_23546	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030381.txt	draft	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Melanie SpineIla", "Brad Wechsler"], "timestamp": "10/26/2015 6:08:48 PM", "subject": "draft", "body": "phaidon and art space. combined basis 96 million, ( reviewed with brad and joe.) . add ten for \nrestructuring . basis 106. mi. subtract total sale price, for both, lets say approx $8 - 15m . leaving loss \nof between 90 and 98 million long term loss. . AMT rate 28 % obama. tax 3.8%. city and state \n12% total aprox 43 %. tax rate. savings 38.7 - 44 m"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033356.txt_23548	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033356.txt	null	[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "5/9/2019 9:28:17 AM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/08/opinion/trump-taxes.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032048.txt_23552	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032048.txt	null	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4/12/2014 11:24:06 AM", "subject": null, "body": "These conspiracy theories are an aberration and an insult to the memory of the crash victims, including the late \nPresident himself As a Pole who is at least somewhat aware of the politics and economics of Poland, and a \njournalist who follows world politics and news developments daily, I am severely disappointed at the number of \npeople that are flocking to these conspiracy theories, and academics and professionals who propagate such ideas \nshould themselves feel ashamed. \nFirstly, there is absolutely no proof that there was any sabotage or subterfuge by either the Russians or the \nPrime Minister's political allies. Such accusations, then, without presenting any credible evidence, are \nslanderous. \nAlso, there would be no political or diplomatic capital gained by either of the \"accused\"... there would be little \nfor the Russian government to gain - it would be a huge diplomatic embarrassment for the Russian government \nto be found guilty of essentially assassinating a head of state. Kaczynski was one of the strongest allies of the \nU.S. among European leaders, and even Russia with its assertive diplomatic policies would not risk a complete \nbreakdown with the U.S. by killing a close ally. International condemnation would also follow, and the \nPresident - perhaps even the Prime Minister - would have to resign and wave good-bye to any political career in \nthe foreseeable future. Yes, \"even in Russia.\" \nSimilarly, for the Prime Minister's party, if he were actually complicit in the crash, that would mean he - or his \nallies - committed a coup d'etat. Also, there will be early presidential elections in June, which might actually go \nin favor of the President's party because of a sympathy vote. The \"acting\" Presidency is in the hands of his party \nfor only two months... so, again, the Prime Minister and his allies have nothing to gain and potentially \neverything to lose in the June vote. \nConspiracy-monging cheapens a national tragedy \nPolitical profit or loss questions aside, however, the conspiracy-monging seems to be taken as a way to discover \nwho's responsible for the tragedy and thus somehow bring them justice. However, it is not a healthy way to deal \nwith the tragedy. It is not conducive to national or personal healing. Furthermore, it disgraces and taints the \nmemory of those who died. \nIt only cheapens the tragedy and, sadly, may foreshadow what's to come in the coming presidential campaign - \nthe tragedy may be used by certain groups or individuals to propagate their own agenda and assume the \npresidency. \nIt is not so different than what has been going on in the U.S., with the \"birthers\" claiming Barack Obama is not \nlegally the President because he is not actually a citizen, or even natural-born citizen. Not as morbid, of course, \nbut still, in my honest opinion, ridiculous. \nBaseless, nonsensical conspiracies simply destroys the abiltiy of the nation and people of Poland to move on \nand honor the memory of those lost, and cheapens the tragedy that has been felt by Poles as far away as Chicago \nas well, and commented on with deep sorrow and respect by U.S. politicians from Mayor Daley to President \nObama himself"}]	1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029137.txt_23553	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029137.txt	Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2017, at 3:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "weekend easy"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 3:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "Terrific; looking forward.\n\nExcited to go through math candidates on the list, others too."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 30, 2017, at 8:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "guest s here until 4. after good"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 8:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "After 4 good.\n\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 31, 2017, at 5:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "either"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 4:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "Ready when you are - let me know and I can call.\n\nFaceTime = email."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 31, 2017, at 4:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "5 min"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuh", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "12/31/2017 9:32:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "OK"}]	8
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032480.txt_23555	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032480.txt	Fwd: RE: TR: update	[{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 5:54:14 PM", "subject": "Fwd: RE: TR: update", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2017 12:15 PM", "subject": "RE: TR: update", "body": "Thanks Darren\nGood news!\n\nI'm under the impression that checks will be exceptional (they are more cumbersome to handle), and we will\nuse mostly wires.\n\nConsidering the time difference, my heavy travel and my own propension to do things at night and on week-\nends I would much prefer having an internet code and be able to organize everything online when I need to.\n\nWhen I use Interaudi (my US bank), they can do that, store the recurring beneficiaries, and do wires in\nmultiple currencies, but I am not familiar with DB.\n\nOf course, you could also have the same access and help me when needed.\n\nAlso, your point about bookkeeping is mitigated by the fact that, in any case, I will also need to have\nsomeone keeping track of the receipts and inventory, before shipping proofs to you. In any case there will be\nneed for some work on my side before final filing is done.\n\nOn the other hand, if there is a \"checks and balances\" control issue, there could be a cap to my wiring powers\n(like the 10 K we discussed), that would be absolutely fine for me if this is the intent.\n\nPlease do let me know.\n\nWe can also talk about it (in Hawai now, free after 2 PM your time)"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025954.txt_23556	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025954.txt	Re: Mechanisms for learning	[{"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \n\nthank you for your support and encouragement, even where I fail. \n\nSorry for being such an embarrassment today. I will spell out today's argument a bit better and cohesive when \nI get to it. Also, I should have recognized that the main point I tried to make would trigger Noam (who was as \nalways very generous, patient, kind and humble on the personal level, even though he did not feel like \nconceding anything on the conceptual one). Almost all of Noam's work focused on the idea that humans have \nvery specific circuits or modules (even when most people in his field began to have other ideas), and his \nfrustration is that it is so hard to find or explain them. \n\nI found Noam's hypothesis very compelling in the past. I still think that the idea that language is somehow a \ncultural or social invention of our species is wrong. But I think that there is a chance (we don't know that, but \nit seems to most promising hypothesis IMHO) that the difference between humans and apes is not a very \nintricate special circuit, but genetically simple developmental switches. The bootstrapping of cognition works \nlayer by layer during the first 20 years of our life. Each layer takes between a few months and a few years to \ntrain in humans. While a layer is learned, there is not much going on in the higher layers yet, and after the low \nlevel learning is finished, it does not change very much. This leads to the characteristic bursts in child \ndevelopment, that have famously been described by Piaget. \n\nThe first few layers are simple perceptual stuff, the last ones learn social structure and self-in-society. The \nswitching works with something like a genetic clock, very slowly in humans, but much more quickly in other \napes, and very fast in small mammals. As a result, human children take nine months before their brains are \nmature enough to crawl, and more than a year before they can walk. Many African populations are quite a bit \nfasters. In the US, black children outperform white children in motor development, even in very poor and \nsocially disadvantaged households, but they lag behind (and never catch up) in cognitive development even \nafter controlling for family income. \n\nGorillas can crawl after 2 months, and build their own nests after 2.5 years. They leave their mothers at 3-4 \nyears. Human children are pretty much useless during the first 10-12 years, but during each phase, their brains \nhave the opportunity to encounter many times as much training data as a gorilla brain. Humans are literally \nsmarter on every level, and because the abilities of the higher levels depend on those of the lower levels, they \ncan perform abstractions that mature gorillas will never learn, no matter how much we try to train them. \n\nThe second set of mechanisms is in the motivational system. Motivation tells the brain what to pay attention \nto, by giving reward and punishment. If a brain does not get much reward for solving puzzles, the individual \nwill find mathematics very boring and won't learn much of it. If a brain gets lots of rewards for discovering \nother people's intentions, it will learn a lot of social cognition. \n\nLanguage might be the result of three things that are different in humans: \n- extended training periods per layer (after the respective layer is done, it is difficult to learn a new set of \nphonemes or the first language) \n- more layers \n- different internal rewards. Perhaps the reward for learning grammatical structure is the same that makes us \nlike music. Our brains may enjoy learning compositional regular structure, and they enjoy making themselves \nunderstood, and everything else is something the universal cortical learning figures out on its own. \n\nThis is a hypothesis that is shared by a growing number of people these days. In humans, it is reflected for \ninstance by the fact that races with faster motor development have lower IQ. (In individuals of the same \ngroup, slower development often indicates defects, of course.) \n\nAnother support comes from machine learning: we find that the same learning functions can learn visual and \nauditory pattern recognition, and even end-to-end-learning. Google has built automatic image recognition into \ntheir current photo app: \nhttp://blogs.wsj . com/digits/2015/07/01/go ogle-mistakenly-tags-black-p eop le-as-gorillas-showing-limits-o f-\nalgorithms/ \n\nThe state of the art in research can do better than that: it can begin to \"imagine\" things. I.e. when the \nexperimenter asks the system to \"dream\" what a certain object looks like, the system can produce a somewhat \ncompelling image, which indicates that it is indeed learning visual structure. This stuff is something nobody \ncould do a few months ago: \nhttp://www.creativeai.net/posts/Mv4WG6rdzAerZF7ch/synthesizing-preferred-inputs-via-deep-generator-\nnetworks \n\nA machine learning program that can learn how to play an Atari game without any human supervision or \nhand-crafted engineering (the feat that gave DeepMind 500M from Google) now just takes about 130 lines of \nPython code. \n\nThese models do not have interesting motivational systems, and a relatively simple architecture. They \ncurrently seem to mimic some of the stuff that goes on in the first few layers of the cortex. They learn object \nfeatures, visual styles, lighting and rotation in 3d, and simple action policies. Almost everything else is \nmissing. But there is a lot of enthusiasm that the field might be on the right track, and that we can learn motor \nsimulations and intuitive physics soon. (The majority of the people in Al do not work on this, however. They \ntry to improve the performance for the current benchmarks.) \n\nNoam's criticism of machine translation mostly applies to the Latent Semantic Analysis models that Google \nand others have been using for many years. These models map linguistic symbols to concepts, and relate \nconcepts to each other, but they do not relate the concepts to \"proper\" mental representations of what objects \nand processes look like and how they interact. Concepts are probably one of the top layers of the learning \nhierarchy, i.e. they are acquired after we learn to simulate a mental world, not before. Classical linguists \nignored the simulation of a mental world entirely. \n\nIt seems miraculous that purely conceptual machine translation works at all, but that is because concepts are \nshared between speakers, so the structure of the conceptual space can be inferred from the statistics of \nlanguage use. But the statistics of language use have too little information to infer what objects look like and \nhow they interact. \n\nMy own original ideas concern a few parts of the emerging understanding of what the brain does. The \n\"request-confirmation networks\" that I have introduced at a NIPS workshop in last the December are an \nattempt at modeling how the higher layers might self-organize into cognitive programs. \n\nCheers! \n\nJoscha"}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 3:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Some thoughts I meant to send back for a long time:"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Am 23.07.2016 um 04:41", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Cells seem to be mostly indistinguishable (except for )04 I thought? \nSize is different on average, but males with small brains are still male. \nVariation of all traits is higher for males, so there are more high IQ men (wider bell-curve). Given average brain \nsize difference, the small difference in average IQ is surprising, I think \ngender differenece. unlikely motivational, every cell is different. size is didfferent. . \nthe more radical idea is that brains are the nucleus of the human\" cell: the body the membrane, . the \norganizm the colletcions and interactions of brains, wisdom of crowds . mirroring. etc. . money used \nas signals. as is spoken language. . what does social behavior mean, it is the cooridination of indiv brains. = \nI think that mathematics based thinking does not allow for censorship. money people concepts if they are \nall math , then poliiical correctness and their structures are only subsets of a larger group of thoughts. its not \nemotinal for me. \nmost people have censorship built in at a deep level, social reasoning gets to different results than equivalent \nabstract reasoning"}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "7/23/2016 10:02:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "no worry, if i understand correctly you are suggsting there are layers 1 through N . lets cal them L 1 - \nLn. there are times T 1- Tn / and then conjecture that changing the time . correlations ( by genetic swtch or \nother method. , you might be able to make blacks smarter by changing the time for motor layer \ndevelopment and changing the time for other layers. . ). like telemeres for the cell , are their equivalents for \nthe layers. . as you talked about culling the unused neurons in each layer, each neuron in each layer would get \ndfferent ( kill yourself if you are not being used instructions ). \n\nand CONCEPTS could be layer to layer communicaiton. . are gender differences also a matter of time , and \nstructure of interactions. . \n\nre taboo \n, maybe climate change is a good way of dealing with overpopulation. . the earths forest fire. potentailly \na good thing for the species \n\ntoo many people, so many mass executions of the elderly and infirm make sense \nis the fundamental fact that everyone dies at some time .make it imporrisbole to ask so why not earilier. if \nthe brain discards unused neurons, why shold socieity keep their equivalent"}]	4
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033577.txt_23583	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033577.txt	PC - Business standard - Thu. 30 March 2017 : After trump phone call, govt weighs if Modi should visit US early	[{"sender": "Anil Ambar i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "3/30/2017 11:01:20 AM", "subject": "PC - Business standard - Thu. 30 March 2017 : After trump phone call, govt weighs if Modi should visit US early", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nInfo.\n\nBR,\nAnil"}]	1
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023318.txt_23590	IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023318.txt	Re:	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brad Wechsler", "aaa Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "grats 3,4,5,6, also need accounting documents and backup. year 2014. other info request to follow"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "Re: tight schedule lets try a set time to speak", "body": "A couple of questions:\n1. Jeffrey-you saw the format in which we organized the back-up for year one of grat 1 (quite thick/alot of back-up).\n\nDoes that format work (for you and internal use) or do you want it simplified/modified. Let's discuss.\n\n2. Since this will take the focus and effort of a lot of people (just to pull and organize the various records...both\nlegal and accting, I'd like to tell the staff that we are answering an \"information request\" from the irs on the\ngrats. It will generally be helpful for them to know why the work is impt.\n\nYou and leon ok with this?\n\nWill call you to discuss."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "tight schedule lets try a set time to speak", "body": "Leon, you hired me to produce a work of art. it was not inexpensive. the value far exceeds any other piece in\nyour collection.- by FAR. It took me 30 years to be able to craft such a work. J understand your desire to\nmodifiy my work, in doing so you have brad telling me , just a bit more red., here let me show\nyou, you yourself pick up a brush a add some strokes. you have joslin spray water on it to maintain it. I\nvigorously complain that joslin in ruining my work.. you describe me as zeus, i describe it as artist and a\nreaction to his work being ruined. however Im aware that you own the work and you have the right to paint\nover it. tear it up , put it in the closet in the basement . its yours.\nI was told that Toms office is sending someone in ,or some people in, to review \"some things.\" brad told me\n,the partnership accounting. I know absolutely nothing more than that. though bringing in his team was my idea\n. Having them review things without even asking for my input , or let alone my direction ,is ridiculous. but.. I\nguess you wanted to save money. ?\nThe audit has brought to the fore the lack of your office quality that i have been violently squawking about. ie\n. children playing with works of art. . It is inconceivable to me that John castrucci is still there , joslin part\ntime, but relied on . joe error prone and brad a corporate bandleader talking about the office's finance team,\naccounting dept, and directing wendy to do things that are clearly not in your interest. ( saving money again\n?) its nuts!!.a still non-existent IT dept. impossible , it was the first thing on my list of things that were\nneeded to be done. Still no trading accounts to speak of , though its prophylactic quality has been discussed\nover and over during the past three years . computers do not read Page Six. the women atthe IRS do.! you\nsaid your motivation in keeping this group of part timers was a consequence of the high cost of my\nartwork. . the unfortunate result was easily predictable. - now\n\nIf you want my and my atelier to continue, I will oversee the audits. take charge of the TRA BRH\n\nassignments and review 2012 amendment options!!( note :your redo of the estate fire drill has not progressed\nvery far ). Lots of paper needs to be collected and reviewed, At MY direction. the outside team will be brought\nin at my expense working for me and you. coming in for interviews and reviews, . sucession, technology, tax\nand compliance. investment reporting , , computerized timelines for filings etc. . household\nclassifcations and reporting with a system of best practices.\n\nMy goal is clear - to end, not extend , our financial interactions. you will have a machine that works , it\nwill not be complexto oversee , to create it, is some thing else . Unfortunatley for us both, the price for my\nworks has not changed since day one. 40m per year, I m willing to discount it to 35 as I did give you a bad\nnumber when asked and should pay an embarassment fine. Im also aware, as you made perfectly clear . that\nyou have already paid what you consider a great deal of money, for my work , but again its value exceeds"}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031964.txt_23591	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031964.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["ehud barak"], "timestamp": "Aug 31, 2013, at 1:06 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Time to write the wait \"until too late \"op Ed ???"}, {"sender": "ehud barak", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 12:03 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "it might be launched before the op ed will be accepted by any major paper"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 31, 2013, at 21:06", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "it will be at a minmumm a week or two not before g20"}, {"sender": "ehud barak", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 2:55 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "After listening to POTUS speech, You're probably right. EB"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["ehud barak"], "timestamp": "8/31/2013 7:21:40 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I would use the opportunity to compare it with iran. the solutions become more compelx with time not less. i \nthink many people would like your views on egypt. syria, etc. russias role.? i think you might point out the \ngassing of\" women and children\" is an expressions from the 20th centry. women are no longer equiv to \nchildren, . civilians. vs combatants . only."}]	5
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015614.txt_23592	IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015614.txt	Edward & Cassell v. Dershowitz CACE 15-000072 (05)	[{"sender": "Susan Moss", "recipients": ["Thomas E. Scott", "Steven R. Safra", "Simpson, Richard", "Borja, Mary", "Eiler, Ashley", "Jack Scarola", "Mary E. Pirrotta", "[email protected]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 04, 2015 11:22:42 AM", "subject": "Edward & Cassell v. Dershowitz CACE 15-000072 (05)", "body": "Good morning,\n\nI am advising of Judge Lynch's rulings on the above referenced case. His rulings are\nas follows:\n\nNon Party's motion to quash, or for protective order, regarding subpoena served on\nnon party law firm Boies Schiller: \| The subpoena, as to the law firm, is quashed\n\nAs to the \"Jane Doe #3\" subpoena: The motion is granted as to request #9, 17,\n18, 20 and 23.\n\nThe motion is denied as to the other requests, but a confidentiality order shall be\nentered.\n\nRegarding the deposition: The depo shall be limited to 4 hours without prejudice to\nrequest additional time in the future.\n\nThe Defendant can be present at the depo.\nThe depo will be taken at the law firm representing the witness.\n\nThere shall be a special master, paid by the Defendant, present at the depo, to rule\non objections.\n\nThe depo will be limited to the issues of this case without prejudice for another\ndepo, if required, in the future.\n\nThe issues and said limitations will be determined by the special master.\n\nEach attorney who had a motion heard, is to prepare the order on their motion for\nthe judges signature, along with sufficient copies, self addressed, self stamped\nenvelopes for all parties.\n\nThese orders cannot be submitted through the order portal.\n\nRespectfully,\n\nSusan Moss\n\nJudicial Assistant to Judge Thomas M. Lynch, IV"}]	1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033563.txt_23593	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033563.txt	Fwd: RE: Barrack is not	[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribi", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "7/9/2018 7:48:10 PM", "subject": "Fwd: RE: Barrack is not", "body": "For ur info\n\nhttps://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesdigitalcovers/2018/07/09/disastrous-deal-staggers-trump-ally-thomas-barrack/"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031504.txt_23596	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031504.txt	Re: Saudi money	[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "I have been called in to help on a big NYT investigation into how low oil prices have been effecting the personal finances of royal family in Saudi Arabia. Obviously they called in much of their cash from the likes of BlackRock and others but I thought you might have some ideas. Maybe some people to talk to?\nI would think its more than cutting down on yachts and private planes or selling real estate in Paris, Istanbul, London.\nAny thoughts?\nPS: does my story on Abraaj get me a meeting with Gates next time he is in town:)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "words that you to refer to one thing, USA. the stock market / the Royal family, . are no longer very useful. In politics the USA meant the white house. now there is pentagon. cia, state, and congress in addition, each feels empowered to act more independantly. stock market even in tech, needs bio tech, consuner tech. infrastrucrue tech. etc. same with Royal family, there are 20k members of a tribe, called the royal family, the words are misleading. if your article is focused on bin salman, or the very top. no one is wondering where they can find the local costco.. but they are aware that a message needs to be sent to their population , regarding the next 20 years, social media, and the selfie crowds post the best of everything, their cutest pictures the amazing food , the luxury resorts. the masses see these things and as the difference between expectations and reality widen, the anger grows. trump has tapped in.\nwith the passage of the 9 11 saudi bill, unlike the french revolution where it was the people of france that revolted against their own aristocracty, with the internet and globalization of discontect it is now the americans that can revolt against the saudi leadership. it is the americans that are demanding women drive, not the saudis"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "Interesting. CEO of big finance form told me that Saudis (SAMA) have withdrawn $200 billion that has been parked with usual suspects over past year or so. That number seem in line with what you know?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "most of the saudi money is tied up in pe funds. no withdrawals allowed. and im not seeing much in the secondary market. . blackrock is more money market, more like custodian than investor."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "what is your back of the envelope guess as to much saudi money tied up in such funds?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "sorry, no good handle without digging"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "10/19/2016 1:55:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "I have spoken to a lot of ceos of fund outfits who say Saudis have been pulling billions of dollars in separate account money -- not just from BR. And plus I cant believe they would have so much tied up in lock ups."}]	7
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026078.txt_23598	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026078.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 9:35 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "much to do around the trump trip. I hope you are enjoying."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, May 14, 2017 at 9:17 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "any tips on how we should communicate with him?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 10:25 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "it depends on which subject. . economic. military, tech?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/14/2017 8:23:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how about the war in yemen?"}]	4