Split (1)

train · 5.08k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

thread_id stringlengths 37 43	source_file stringlengths 35 37	subject stringlengths 0 231 ⌀	messages stringlengths 88 34.9k	message_count int64 1 42
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031099.txt_20307	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031099.txt	Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein	[{"sender": "Rush, George [unknown@unknown]", "recipients": ["Howard Rubenstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 08, 2009 11:MS FM", "subject": "Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Howard: \nWe're working on a story for our Sunday column about Jeffrey Epstein. I thought I might send \nmy questions to you tonight, so you'd have them first thing tomorrow. \n\nWould you like to comment on the following:\n1. You've said that the women pressing suits against Mr. Epstein \"have lied repeatedly, and in \nno way shape or form were they victims. They were at his place freely and voluntarily. And one \nof them showed Epstein a fake ID.\" What do you have to say now that Mr. Epstein has \nadmitted in his federal plea bargain that he did conspire to entice minors to engage in \nprostitution? Accepting that these women came voluntarily, isn't Mr Epstein still guilty of \nstatutory rape? \n2. Brad Edwards, an attorney who represents three of the women, recently served a \nSubpoena to Testify at a Deposition on Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine \nMaxwell. The Subpoena asks that Maxwell produce \"a list of all girls\" that visited \nJeffrey Epstein's homes in Palm Beach and Manhattan, or flew on his \nplanes. Edwards said in an interview that Maxwell was \"second-in-command of \nEpstein's criminal enterprise.\" He added, \"She was on Epstein's plane, transporting girls \nfor the purpose of having sex with other people. She kept a computer database of hundreds of \ngirls and oversaw the schedule of girls who came to Epstein's homes.\" \n3. A suit filed last May by \"Jane Doe 102\" against Epstein alleges that, after recruiting her as a 15-\nyear-old girl to give Epstein massages, Maxwell and Epstein took part in \"sexually assaulting, \nbattering, exploiting, and abusing Plaintiff.\" \n4. The same suit alleges that Epstein \"lured\" the girl \"every day for next two weeks\" to his \nhouse. The suit claims that she eventually became a \"sex slave\" to Epstein, traveling with him \naround the world. \"In all of these locations, she was required to engage in sex acts with him and \nother women - including other minors.\" \n5. Did Jane Doe 102 — who now lives in Australia — go on the 2002 trip where \nPresident Clinton flew on Mr. Epstein's Boeing 727? \n6. \"Most of these acts of abuse occurred during a time when defendant [Jane Doe 102] knew \nthat the plaintiff was approximately 15, 16 and 17 years old and, after years of daily sexual \nexploitation continued into her adulthood ... until she fled at age 19,\" \n7. When Maxwell and Epstein celebrated Jane Doe 102's 16th birthday with her, Epstein joked that \nhe would have to \"trade her in\" because she was getting too old for him. \n8. Not only was Jane Doe 102 required to satisfy Epstein's \"every sexual whim,\" but she also was \nexploited by Epstein's adult male peers. They included \"royalty, politicians, academicians, \nbusinessmen and others in various locations around the world.\" \n9. The Palm Beach Post and lawyers representing Epstein's alleged victims have called his federal \nnon-prosecution agreement a \"secret,\" \"backroom,\" \"sweetheart\" deal, noting that none of his \nalleged victims was consulted. Several critics have claimed Epstein \"bought\" the agreement, using \npolitically-connected lawyers. Would he like to comment? \n10. Is Epstein cooperating with federal suit against Bear Steams hedge fund managers Ralph Cioffi \nand Matthew Tannin? Will he testify in their cases? \n11. Mr Epstein was deposed on this week, on Thursday. Is it true that he answered almost every \nquestion by invoking his Fifth Amendment rights? \n12. Defense attorney Brad Evans has filed a motion to freeze Mr Epstein's assets. Has Mr. \nEpstein moved his money from the US offshore or abroad, or does he intend to, in order to \nprotect his assets from possible damage claims? \n13. What did Mr. Epstein do during his work release program while serving time. Reports have \nsaid he engaged in \"scientific research.\" If so, what was he researching? \n14. Has Mr. Epstein returned to pursuing his investment business? Is Mr Epstein still on \nprobation? \n15. Is Mr. Epstein permitted to leave Florida or the United States? Do authorities hold his \npassport? \n\nYou can reach me via e-mail or at 212-210-1536 or 917-952-4052. We close our column at 3 \npm on Friday but can add comments as late as 3 pm on Saturday. Many thanks. \nGeorge"}, {"sender": "Howard Rubenstein", "recipients": ["Darren"], "timestamp": "October 9, 2009 7:26:54 AM PDT", "subject": "FW: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Darren: \nI hope you are well. \nSince we are no longer working for Jeffrey, I'm forwarding this Daily News request to you so you can handle it as you see \nfit. \nMany thanks, \nHoward"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeevacation <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Michael J. Pike"], "timestamp": "10/9/2009 5:24:34 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]	4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030387.txt_20310	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030387.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Leon Black"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 30, 2017 10:50 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/shrinks-break-silence-president-trump-exhibits-traits-m-article-1.2957688"}, {"sender": "Leon Black <IMMIMI>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Jeffrey- I can't print this and when we try- it messes up the computer. Perhaps you can have Lesley scan it — or show it to Leon this afternoon. Thanks, Melanie"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Leon Black"], "timestamp": "1/30/2017 3:53:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "ok"}]	3
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030460.txt_20313	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030460.txt	null	[{"sender": "gmax <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["J Jep <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 8 2011 08:17 PM", "subject": "<no subject>", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance\n\nhttp://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html\n\nby Vicky Ward\n\nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n\n“I’ve got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I’ve just been. You will never think the same way about anything again.”\n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up everywhere at the moment as the alleged “procurer” of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of another investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with allegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British newspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein’s friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to publicly disassociate himself from his old pal.\n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” It was largely a business piece that focused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les Wexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude Hoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of $450 million.\n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein’s great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women with whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn’t really go there, focusing instead on the issue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.\n\nThis is not to say I didn’t hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I concentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same ones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one case, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know: Who is she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fair story that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself.\n\nBizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept running into both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of young women with him who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. “Do they speak?” I remember asking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He laughed. “Not like you, Vicky,” was his riposte.\n\nI remembered that when we’d once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn’t studied math since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at home via messenger. It was a book: “Math for idiots.”\n\nSo he is not without humor, even though he doesn’t drink or smoke, and hates restaurants.\n\n“Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,” newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He was certainly preaching to the converted. The truth is, Epstein does know a lot about a lot of things. Just a few moments in his company and you know this to be true.\n\nWhen I saw pictures of Prince Andrew walking in Central Park with Jeffrey, my immediate thought was that “Andy”—as Jeffrey calls him—is probably asking for help with his role as British trade envoy, or whatever his strange title is. Because if one thing’s for sure: When it comes to international business, Jeffrey knows what he’s talking about far more than “Andy” does. Which is why Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman and a few other financiers hang out with him."}]	1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029131.txt_20314	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029131.txt	Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs	[{"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 3:21 PM", "subject": "Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "Terrific; looking forward.\nExcited to go through math candidates on the list, others too.\n\nEqually important, discuss edits/modifications to the 13 episodes (cutting blahs), expanding math episodes -\nsee below. Assuming we expand math episodes, we will need more mathematicians.\n\nHow’s late afternoon after 5:30 pm / early evening today? - or weekend, day/times? (Family issues today -\n\nmother 102 in May.)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2017, at 3:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "weekend easy"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 8:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "Tomorrow Sunday after 1:00 pm? Flexible. Anytime.\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 30, 2017, at 8:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "guest s here until 4. after good"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 8:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "After 4 good.\n\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 31, 2017, at 5:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "either"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "12/31/2017 9:21:59 PM", "subject": "Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "Ready when you are - let me know and I can call.\n\nSkype -\n\nFaceTime = email."}]	7
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032486.txt_20316	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032486.txt	Fwd: TR: TR: update	[{"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "February 16, 2017 at 9:29:08 PM EST", "subject": "TR: TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren\nI hope all is well\ncan you let me know if the below modus operandi works for you?\n\nall the best"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "mercredi 15 février 2017 18:15", "subject": "RE: TR: update", "body": "Thanks Darren\n\nGood news!\n\nI'm under the impression that checks will be exceptional (they are more cumbersome to handle), and we will\nuse mostly wires.\n\nConsidering the time difference, my heavy travel and my own propension to do things at night and on week-\nends I would much prefer having an internet code and be able to organize everything online when I need to.\n\nWhen I use Interaudi (my US bank), they can do that, store the recurring beneficiaries, and do wires in\nmultiple currencies, but I am not familiar with DB."}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "2/17/2017 2:34:42 AM", "subject": "Fwd: TR: TR: update", "body": ""}]	3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031323.txt_20319	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031323.txt	Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards	[{"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:36 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hello Jeffrey —\n\nI hope all is well with you. As per Peggy Siegal’s office, I have included here the invitation to the IFP Gotham Awards ceremony, which will be held on Monday, November 27 at Cipriani Wall Street in New York City.\n\nThis year’s ceremony is going to be another successful event. We couldn’t be more thrilled with this year’s impressive group of Tributees. The Actress Tribute will go to Nicole Kidman and the Actor Tribute to Dustin Hoffman. The Director Tribute will be given to Sofia Coppola, with the Cinematographer Tribute going to Ed Lachman. With the Industry Tribute, we will be honoring Jason Blum, founder of Blumhouse Productions. And we simply couldn’t be more pleased to honor Vice President Al Gore with this year’s special Humanitarian Tribute. With nominees this year ranging from Willem Dafoe, Adam Sandler and Robert Pattison to Margot Robbie, Lois Smith and Mary J. Blige, this year’s ceremony looks to be the most star studded ever.\n\nPlease let me know if you have any questions.\n\nBest regards,\nSteven"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "A. Peggy Siegal", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "happy to buy your 10k of chairs and will need me plus 3 seats."}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025946.txt_20321	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025946.txt	RE:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 20:42:23 -0400", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "congragulations"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 8:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Thank you!\nDid you really like it?\nHow did you like furniture?\nWhat would you change it?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:01:22 -0400", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i think it was terrific , the only thing i wourd think about is having only one lit sculpture at a time . put one in storage or covered, but you want to call attention to one at a time."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 9:03 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Great! Happy to hear it.\nTrust your advice and taste - this is why I am asking!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:06:27 -0400", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "and maybe have the large colums black instead of gold, as the gold paint is not as good as the gold metal objects."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "7/11/2016 1:08:58 AM", "subject": "RE: ", "body": "I was thinking of black.\nIt is not a gold pain but a gold leafing. It took them 2 months to do it.\nWhat I do not like that it came out more as a Trump gold that an old gold."}]	6
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033344.txt_20324	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033344.txt	POTUS	[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "3/18/2019 1:50:32 AM", "subject": "POTUS", "body": "Appears President Trump 6757 is in Islip, we are parked right in front of it, \nit came here on Tuesday and is due to depart Wednesday this week"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033422.txt_20329	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033422.txt	NY	[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [[email protected]]", "Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "12/14/2018 2:59:21 PM", "subject": "NY", "body": "Do you think NY on Monday is still possible?\nI guess It makes sense to leave the G550 in PBI until Wednesday then fly it to Boca, Since Trump arrival\nis Friday.,\nShould I leave plane in PBI until Wednesday?\nThx\nLarry"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030983.txt_20336	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030983.txt	Fwd: Alex Acosta update \| Power Line	[{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "12/6/2018 10:17:57 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Alex Acosta update \| Power Line", "body": "Begin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Robert Grusky", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "December 6, 2018 at 3:52:15 PM EST", "subject": "Alex Acosta update \| Power Line", "body": "https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/12/alex-acosta-update.php\n\nAlex Acosta update\n\nEarlier this week, pedophile Jeffrey Epstein bought his way out of a lawsuit that would have\ngiven some of his victims the opportunity to testify about his predatory and criminal\nconduct. Victims never got that opportunity when Epstein faced criminal charges, because\nAlex Acosta — then the lead prosecutor, now the Secretary of Labor — let Epstein off with\na ridiculously lenient sentence. Despite having committed hideous sex offenses with dozens\nof minors, Epstein received a sentence of 13 months in jail, during which he was often free\nduring the day.\n\nEpstein’s decision to buy his out of the civil lawsuit, one that he had the nerve to initiate,\nbenefits Acosta. The trial would have provided non-stop headlines, coupled with frequent\nreferences to the sweetheart deal Acosta gave him. As Randy Schultz puts it, the trial would\nhave been the occasion for a long overdue public shaming of Acosta. Now, he avoids this\nconsequence.\n\nBut this doesn’t mean Acosta is out of the woods. He faces calls for his ouster from the\nTrump cabinet.\n\nSome calls are from the usual suspects. Michelle Goldberg of the New York Times has\nwritten a piece so obnoxious that it almost makes me want to see Acosta ride out the storm.\n\nBut some conservatives are also advocating Acosta’s departure. Concerned Women for\nAmerica 1s a stalwart conservative organization. It describes itself, accurately, as “focus[ed]\non seven core issues: the family, the sanctity of human life, religious liberty, education,\nsexual exploitation, national sovereignty, and support for Israel.” (Emphasis added)"}]	2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031445.txt_20340	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031445.txt	Re: Today...	[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 10:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "Have you read? When's good to talk?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:03 PM", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "be back on land around 4"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <q", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "In NYC or otherwise? Why don't we plan on talking then at about 5:00."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sunday, March 29, 2015", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "ok, i need to run by lawyers, your sentene appears to read i nevefr met clinton or gore?? harsh about\nwomen, i thought we modified that."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "3/29/2015 4:22:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "Ok. Talk at 5:00."}]	5
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032714.txt_20342	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032714.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 3, 2018, at 9:05 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "<_____________________>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 1:27 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i m traveling to see terry and antonio in dubai and bahrain .. wish you were here .. weather is greatc14"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 8, 2018, at 2:53 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Me too"}, {"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "1/10/2018 7:29:10 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2018-01-10/saudis-alarm-their-friends-more-than-foes-in-mideast-power-plays"}]	4
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030773.txt_20345	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030773.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:52 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Strange time I have two more friends up to bat"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Looks like I can't get away. But will be back in NYC on Sunday. Let me know when you're back too. I have a bad feeling about this new Woody round. It could pull him into the general Harvey pool of the despised and shunned. Clearly what Ronan and company are hoping for. I think Bannon may be right. This is not going to end until Trump goes down."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 3:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.washinetontimes.com/news/2017/dec/10/glenn-simpsons-fusion-gps-ran-donald-trump-\nsmear-c/"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And they won't be the last. My buddy, Lorin Stein, who runs the Paris Review--the Paris Review for god's\nsake!--just went down. The 80-year-old father of my friend Rachel Horovitz--the playright Israel Horovitz--\nwhacked. Big names on the horizon: Michael Douglas, Larry Gagosian, and still my favorite, Arthur\nSulzberger."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you and i are old news? :)."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:52 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Cross your fingers."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 7:54:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "beleive you me , i do"}]	7
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032066.txt_20358	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032066.txt	Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein	[{"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["'Martin G. Weinberg'"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty, \n\nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another \nman, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We're planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we \nwant to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this \nbehalf?\n\nMy number is\n\nThank you in advance.\n\nDavid Ingram\nCorrespondent\nReuters News\nThomson Reuters"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "April 28, 2016 at 12:14:37 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sorry, the suit is attached to this email."}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg <martinweinberg@unknown>", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:25:55 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]	4
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030767.txt_20367	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030767.txt	Re: crown prince	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolf"], "timestamp": "4/27/2017 12:57:44 PM", "subject": "Re: crown prince", "body": "yes great"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:56 AM", "subject": "Re: crown prince", "body": "Was with Bannon last night who was saying how much Trump liked deputy crown prince: \"Real guy's guy, he loved him. Thinks they can do stuff together.\""}]	2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031479.txt_20372	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031479.txt	Audio recording	[{"sender": "King, Kathryn", "recipients": ["Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Vcingarten, Reid S", "Rem zi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz.", "David Marin", "Erin Billings", "Drake, Wiliam", "Will Bohlen", "Keough, Michael"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 12:27 PM", "subject": "Audio recording", "body": "All,\n\nI just received a copy of the audio recording with Q&A. The video recording will be available mid-to-late\nafternoon. As the file will be too large to distribute via email, we have two posting options:\n\na) Upload to Steptoe’s FTP site, where the file is public but not (easily) discoverable to the casual Steptoe.com\nbrowser or searcher. We would send reporters the link, at which point they would download the recording in\norder to watch it.\n\nB) Upload the file to Steptoe’s YouTube channel and set the security around the video so that it’s only\nwatchable by someone who has the link. It would not be discoverable by anyone who doesn’t have the exact\nURL (searching or browsing). The advantage with this option is the reporters could watch the video via the\nYouTube player, rather than downloading a file.\n\nI believe our preference is the second choice?\n\nThanks,\nKathy"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033191.txt_20377	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033191.txt	Trump's possible cabinet picks	[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 5:57:27 PM", "subject": "Trump's possible cabinet picks", "body": "http://www.marketwatch.com/story/from-zero-to-hero-most-of-trumps-speculated-cabinet-was-in-the-policy-wilderness-before-election-2016-11-11/print"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030620.txt_20378	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030620.txt	Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein	[{"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": ["Tonja Haddad Coleman <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs:\n\nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial and the witness list which names________________and other young women who allege they were underage victims of Mr Epstein.\n\nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their claims.\n\nMs further has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and instructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter.\n\nShe claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of entertaining President Clinton. She claims she herself was sex trafficked to several other men, whose contact information is contained in an address book of Mr Epstein's filed in court records.\n\nMay we have a comment please? Our deadline is 1pm tomorrow (SATURDAY) ET.\n\nYours sincerely,\nSharon Churcher\nThe Mail on Sunday (New York office)"}, {"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": ["Fred Haddad"], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2013, at 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Fred Haddad"], "timestamp": "10/19/2013 12:30:10 AM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031786.txt_20386	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031786.txt	Mueller drew up obstruction indictment against Trump, Michael Wolff book claims	[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "5/28/2019 3:18:36 PM", "subject": "Mueller drew up obstruction indictment against Trump, Michael Wolff book claims", "body": "http s ://www.the guardian. com/us-news/2019/may/28/mueller-trump-ob struction-charge-michael-wo lff-b o ok-\nsiege-under-fire-news"}]	1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032647.txt_20387	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032647.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["larry"], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "at the moment we will go to Ish on sunday the 26th early then to new york where 1 will stay the week,\n\nlarry , it will be assayay and1I, trump is in town that week,"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "11/16/2017 10:27:22 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey,\nThx for the update,\n\nJust to confirm, LSJ trip is Next Sunday the 26th as you stated,,\n\nPOTUS schedule:\nArrival: Tuesday November 21\" @ 1800ish\n\nDeparture: Sunday November 26\" @ 1500ish"}]	2
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023322.txt_20391	IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023322.txt	Fwd:	[{"sender": "Larry", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 6:13 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "Leon, Congragulations on biting the bullet. at least 18 months late , but Im encouraged and glad for you. When you interviewed Brad two years ago you asked that i not tell him what a disaster lay before him. what would you like me to tell Barry?\n\nThere is a HUGE amount of work to be done in the next 9 -12 months. mostly the exact same work that i outlined in my email of 2 years ago. now complicated by years of mess on top. ( you can send it again if you like ). Brad wechsler was never up to the task . sorry, I realize I have been saying the very same thing for a long time. he was a not a step up from Eileen but a step sideways. in the beginning there was Eileen and Tom and Ralph Lerner. all your hand picks. then brad. john, Joe. . joslin was chosen from a pool of 2 people. each that would be limited by a salary of 250k. ( yes i personally augmented his comp in order to get him ) I did say hire both Lisa to do the bookkeeping and joslin tax, \| He complained for over a year , re his direction by eileen and ada , and then brad. His breakdown was not a surprise after months and moths of warnings. Though disabled, he ran your office this year. with john and joe. He ran amok, and as i told you he rarely failed to remind me in our conversations that you told him that he works for you and not for me and that brad needs to pays him .\n\n. Asking me who to hire , estate attny tax people etc. :\n\nI have taken heat for years over the fact that 1 gave you no more than carlyns name, . no follow up questions no interactions , not even one single question asked of me re her work. (that was Eileen _) but somehow carlyns fuck up was my doing. . _ when i told you that i thought Eileen wasn't up to the task, you bellowed that i was talking out of both sides of my mouth. . You told me this year , that by trying to protect you from crazy joslin, I had in essence fired him and it was my responsibility to do his work. it then turns out that he didn't consider himself fired at all he just received less money. and continued to make a really dangerous mess.. Joshn castrucci, in your eyes, was also my doing , though email after email said , I take no responsibility for him,and 1YOU SHOULD NOT HIRE HIM \|!!! , your response was that was my opinion was only because i didn't trust him. then to add insult to injury last jan you told me he was gone. however he too is still there, and a waste of money and space.\n\nMy time is complicated by Donald's potentially eviscerating any reason for anyone to use the foreign funds repatriation plan that 1 had put together. . however as you are aware I have some decisions to make re my time allocation in the next year or two. so at least for a few weeks I am unable to commit much time and make any future plans to guide you in the redoing of your procrastination produced mess.\n\nThat being said, the tasks at hand are the following.\n\nYou have abomb of colored string that your retarded children have formed , It Has to be very carefully unwound , even the substitution of Barry for your next trustee, needs a careful focus on procedure.s It would be much preferable if Wechsler was not his replacement. do you have any person you trust ??!. Iam concermed re brad taking barrys place re XXXX. In the beginning Barry will need to find and learn ACCURATE .. org charts. books , balance sheets . trust valuations. are alla part. Barry will need 2 months to just get his arm around what is there , this is before any needed modifications.,\n\na way overdue re- fresh of your estate plan. . clats , trust. partnerships. grats. Ilcs. bank accounts , filing requirements. etc. the long awaited review of the brh tra and shareholders agreement to see how they fit into new plan. . \"XXXXX\" planning. art partnership engagement .. , airplane re-do. , buying another. .? boat sale , Miami sale. . TRADING ACCOUNTS. . three years overdue. . an accounting system. fire john .. Joslin stays for a year. or so. so does tom and . except for heather everyone should be replaced with new. . Sell Artspace and shut down regan arts. . rationalize. cash flow reporting. cash mgmt. stock sales. sec irs. gaming. foreign reporting. the 8865 mess will take months to review now. . you CANNOT file unreviewed audited documents. .CANNOT!!! _ this will be very detailed work. . a self inflicted wound - all avoidable if professionals had been in place to limit . or contain it. . . you will need 3 new hires .as there is no one in your office that is truly an A player. I have great hope in Barry as you know. He will need to be trained. note"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030152.txt_20417	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030152.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "what is your schedule?"}, {"sender": "Daniel Siad <11111>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 2:28 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Can you call me \nI am with tigrane he would like to meet you he is here with me in Ibiza with 8 top girls he said he would like to \nbuild some thing with you \ncan you come to Ibiza we have a huge house or how can we orgnise this meeting even Jean Luc could doo a \ngreat biz also \nhe has the most amizing top models on stand by I told him not to do any deals with anybody before he meet \nwith you. \nhe stoped working with IMG and Trump wi here please call me and let me know what is your plans \nwarmest regards \nDaniel"}, {"sender": "Daniel Siad", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "7/24/2010 1:32:05 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "the other girl name is Anastasia kuznetsova"}]	3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031684.txt_20423	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031684.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff PO"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 9:43:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Salvator Mundi, the last known da Vinci painting in private hands, has an incredible provenance. Rybolovlev purchased it for $127 million in 2013 through his art dealer, the Swiss businessman Yves Bouvier. Bouvier, the owner and operator of several freeports, bought the painting for $80 million with the intention of selling it to Rybolovlev at a steep profit. Its owner before Bouvier, the New York City-based gallerist Robert Simon, found the painting at an estate auction in New Orleans in 2005. He paid just $10,000."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You"}, {"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "have an art guy?\n\nIn addition my art guyd said the painting wasn’t very good"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Starting to smell sweet, the way you put it!"}, {"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "reminder trump overuled congress on yemen ."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "So MBS was paying him off? Why? Ideas?"}, {"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is it a coincidence that the russian that bought the house in palm beach and knows all , is the same guy that sold a painting last year to mbs for 450 million dollars. that was only worth 1. 5m?"}]	7
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022230.txt_20428	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022230.txt	Re: Results	[{"sender": "Al Seckel <111111111111111.11111111111111111>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "Jeffrey, \n\nThe hots did the sweep. Here are the new results taken as of a minute ago. You have only one negative article left on front page of google, which is the Huffington Post article. The Huffington Post is extremely hard to move, because it is so powerful, has millions of links to it, and uploads massive new and original content it on a daily basis with posting from out side readers. We managed to push it down the page, as it used to be at the top. If we were able to post original content to both the science and the org site (absolutely not a single word to this day by Jessica, just talk), we would have been able to push it down even further, and off the page. WE did manage to get rid of the daily beast article, which is now far removed, inspite of their own efforts to keep it prominent. \n\nToxic suggested search engine terms that popped up automatically when you typed in your name are also now removed. \n\nWikipedia was an important victory, as it will always be at the top of the search engine results. ow the head lines do not mention convicted sex offender or pedophile. Instead, Philanthrophic work, Epstein Foundation, Promotion of Scientists. We have stopped the hacking on your wiki site, and that was a major effor. Your wiki entry now is pretty tame, and bad stuff has been muted, bowlerized, and pused to the bottom. Careful editing and wording has muted the effect immensely. We hacked the site to replace the mug shot and caption, and now has an entirely different photo and caption. This was a big success. \n\nWe pushed the Edge all the way up to the front page, where it was previously buried on page 5 of google search. \n\nWe have promoted the other jeffrey epsteins, and other pages are also filled with your material. \n\nAnd, while the sites are up, and in the direction we hoped, they are still new, and subject to volitility, especially if new original content is not added on a minimum of a weekly basis. I have been forbideen to add new content to the philanthrophic site as well as the science site, and therefore, as a result our rating slipped down (still on the first page, but would have liked them (and some of the articles to been able to push Huffington off page). We also helped with you images, and the first images that come of you on a google search are not of your mug shot, etc. \n\nYour daily beast foe is still at it, and trying to promote her sites against you in the same way that we try to depromote you. \n\nAs far as this site is concerned, and the continuation of this, I do not know what you wish to do. Clearly, you have no interest in my continuing. And, I am not sure if you want to continue the project at all. If the latter, and you stop, eventually it will just go into the way of entropy, and it will return to the old form. The major work has been done, but it needs to be maintained. For it to get better results, it needs to have constant input and supervision, and that means generating proper content, not just editing and grammatical fixes. Writers need to know what to write. THe philanthrophy site is at the bottom of the page precisely because you have not allowed us to add any content to it, and as a result it suffers. \n\nYou paid Mike $2500, which he applied for the purchasing of his replacement servers, but his fee of $7500 balance is now due if you want to continue. Please let me know what you want to do. I need to inform him, and if you are not going to use him, he needs to take on his other clients and devote his time there. \n\nThis needs to be contrasted with what we started with, which was a search on your name, which had nine/10 very toxic prominent stories, and toxic Wiki article and headline."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Al Seckel"], "timestamp": "Thu, December 16, 2010 5:01:25 AM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "I was never told never, that there was a 10k fee per month„ you inittaly said the project would take 20.. then another 10. then another 10. ."}, {"sender": "Al Seckel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "My initial estimate, given to me by Pablos, was 25, and that was based solely on his quick look at the situation, and not knowing what was really out there. In fact, as I have repeated many times, the job was far far worse that originally expected, you have a dedicated group of people trying to undo and damage you, including now, they have started up in the last week full force again, as it is obvious that they can't fux with your wiki page any more as we blocked that.. The woman from the Daily Beast. We have programs that track this stuff, and so, for the past few days, Mike has been having a cyber war with her minions, who are actively trying to undo what we are doing, as she is trying to push her Daily beast and other articles back up. So, we have to go back and push them back down. \n\nThen, there was the issue of trying to create additionally on you a positive web presence, with the science and org sites. \n\nI spend literally four months of non-stop work, creativity, and my own political capital to getyou this so far, which saved you not only time, but countless dollars, and isn't something that can be readily bought. I had people working also for free. I gained access to information that standard seo companies don't have. In addition, I wasted a lot of time talking to people who promise to help, but end up providing nothing, and so, I end up having to do it myself What do I get in return, constant back slapping to my head... \n\nWe were trying to fix up your mess. I didn't create it. Just thought it would be something to help. This was NEVER about trying to pull money out of you, and fact, we have don't everything possible to keep the costs down considerably. \n\nI must talk to you about the island thing asap. When can we do that?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Al Seckel"], "timestamp": "Thu, December 16, 2010 5:20:13 AM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "over the weekend."}, {"sender": "Al Seckel <111111111111111.11111111111111111>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "12/16/2010 1:31:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "Conshita is very media savy, as you are probably well aware. She knows exactly what we are doing, and is taking her own counter-measures, but it is constant wack-a-mole with her."}]	5
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023336.txt_20433	IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023336.txt	Detailed constructive list.	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:45 PM", "subject": "Detailed constructive list.", "body": "okay, its time for you to decide how you would like to move forward. ( fyi get your money from the 1031 . the screw up is only one of many,) If you decide to move foward on decanting. phaidon, note basis estate update , each requires many carefully orchestrated detailed steps. and precision . there are hundreds of millions in saving if done correctly and a huge mess if not. If you want me and my colleagues to do it , oversee it paper it and guide it, you should tell me. It is a big undertaking . If not , ok .. Brad and your crew"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:35 AM", "subject": "Detailed constructive list.", "body": "Deciisions needed asap 1 phaidon. topco etc. .( cash needs) many wires needed !! 2 new trustee or not. - new decantings 3 art in art partnership.??! .overdue ?!4 grats? window - 5 art space. .6 regan arts. .7 plane simplify re strucuture re finance. re purpose . 8 .boat restrucutre , sister, 9 re fresh estate plan. to consider modifications Alex Victoria equal does not mean same. 10. tra review , sale. , 11 brh, doc review, 12. sale of stock or art ? tax, rent sale 13. gifts of art. 14. charity current and future pledges , gifts, 15 cash flow. . 16. new IT and new personnel. 17. operational re-do ( bill pay etc). 18 debra and children ? current and future involvement . notifications etc. . new dynasty trust ? 19. tax plan and dislosures gaming. foreign apollo and phaidon related . 20. investments rationalize incl trading accouints . 21. bank loans . rates ? ? terms etc. consolidate. plane boat houses. disclosures? 22 . consolidate and review and reduce the number of all bank accounts and legal entities. decanting liquidating etc. . 23 all outside consultants? valuations etc. 24 review legal bills carefullly. 25. third party responsibilty Bens house , alex films . etc."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Detailed constructive list.", "body": "left me felling quite uneasy.\n\nsince you asked since last nov. ifound 11 million dollars in dormant accounts. 4 million dollars in eileens drawer. . went through cash flows for phaidon shwoing that john murphy is not an accountant. redid your gagosian contract ,. organized structure in case of divorce. set up gift trust. stopped ada from including multiple times things not in your interest. dealt with bad sales tax use tax income tax . created 8 millino in deductions ,500k in mistakes , found bank of scotland fbar problems, . . reorg bad art purchases , funds taken, , charibale decustions , helped with fincnacil sttment gamoing commions fling. . boat deductions, rescued stock from grats.. may 1 after months of brad not finding anyone 1 sent an email saying you would have to pay more. . on april 15. I sent an email detailing payments owed if 1 could figure out the basis issue, please see attached, .\n\nquestions you might ask your team ask them to provide a balance sheet or p&l for REgan arts. . doesnt exist ask . either wechsler or haperin to tell you what brh is, or how the tra works. .. ? as bronstein to tell you why the proposed phaidon transaction DOES not work. . as them to give you a plan for the plane. ? ask them to show you the cash mgmt for over 100 million dollars. . ask them to show you the IT system progress after one year. . the approval process for payables. . the cash flow projections? assumptions? ask for a comparative review of investments. ask haperin to describle to you in any detail BRH , the major asset of his two biggest clients. tax basis, disposiotion in the estate. . etc. ask brad to show you the liquidation of the inteveing art space cos? .\n\nLast year you asked , for my help I told you I preferred not as we would be better off having no financial intereactions. the risk was not worth it. You told me that as my friend i had to do it Iagreed., here we are in what I find to be an awkward situation. the transactions that i decvised were used , our agreement was ignored. and im not sure how to respond."}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030634.txt_20435	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030634.txt	null	[{"sender": "[email protected]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "6/24/2016 10:34:22 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Where are you? Not answering your cell\nwhat the f... Does going to open lk down not good... Trump is saying its a great thing really???"}]	1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033565.txt_20445	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033565.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 10, 2018, at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trump will problably hire dershowitz,, no joke"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "4/10/2018 1:20:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes agree\n\nseems like dershowitz has been interviewing for that job for last 2 months on fox news.."}]	2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033203.txt_20463	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033203.txt	Re:	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi jeffrey hope all is well \| think you are going to have a windertful life from now on in your opinion how much is left in\nthis market it's been a trump triumph \| gave him some money through woody best jonathan"}, {"sender": "[email protected]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 12:25:22 P.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "plenty left"}, {"sender": "\|E", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yikes your birthday coming up next month"}, {"sender": "[email protected]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 12:30:19 P.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "oy"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 5:31:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "well heaven can wait"}]	5
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022766.txt_20468	IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022766.txt	ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE	[{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "4/22/2015 7:03:52 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "As just received."}, {"sender": "Hill, James E.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 22, 2015, 1:57 PM", "subject": "FW: inquiry From ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]	2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033217.txt_20471	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033217.txt	Kathy Ruemmler shared a link: Malevolence Tempered by Incompetence: Trump’s Horrifying Executive Order on Refugees and Visas - Lawfare	[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "1/29/2017 1:44:28 PM", "subject": "Kathy Ruemmler shared a link: Malevolence Tempered by Incompetence: Trump’s Horrifying Executive Order on Refugees and Visas - Lawfare", "body": "Malevolence Tempered by Incompetence: Trump’s Horrifying Executive Order on Refugees and Visas - Lawfare from John Heilemann’s Tweet\n\nDownload the Twitter app"}]	1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028978.txt_20478	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028978.txt	Re: Trump	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:05 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I'm interviewing him this afternoon. Anything you think I should ask?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 25, 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "do you want to be provacative .? trump shuttle. hawaiin tropic contests.. mortgage on mara lago. ? revenue of golf courses as income.??! , total debt of all cos. ? people dont want to conribute money as he said he is worth over 10b , why should they? , calif already coming up short. . fatther bought chips in the casino to stave off bankruptcy, chips because it was better than a first lien. under the gambling rules. matt his bag man? his loan from his brother in law ( JUdges husband) how much did his father leave. his brother robert etc. otherwise you can just throw easys"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:12 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Job is to get the hard ones in without being ejected from the room. What's the one question that pierces through?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Wednesday, May 25, 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "maybe you can ask why bernie nussbaum got vince fosters letter quickly, that is a hillary problem. he would smile then you can ask his realtionsjipwith the elctricians unions and maralago . and out you go"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "5/25/2016 11:19:00 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "What's the thumb nail on Nussbaum/foster?"}]	5
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026237.txt_20482	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026237.txt	Re:	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i mat the door but i will wait for my time.. i dont want to come early to find trump in your housee@©@"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 9:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 8:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i forget to ask .. is there any new update about the saudi project that 1 sent you??"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 9, 2017, at 1:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "They told me to discuss in Jan"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 5:3 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i m trying to wear the sweater but it has been geeting a bit warm here@"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 22, 2017, at 2:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what have you been doing? any fun?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 7:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im ok .. still waiting for new york trip .. taking the family to dubai for new year &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 22, 2017, at 3:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "great. have fun. . with the crazy tax bill, Ill stayin US until end of year."}, {"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "12/22/2017 12:23:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. keep us posted about your gcc trip &"}]	9
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031516.txt_20489	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031516.txt	FW: Trump lawyers given court date over lawsuit alleging rape of 13-year-old I US news I The Guardian	[{"sender": "stanpottinger", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 20, 2016 9:31 PM", "subject": "Trump lawyers given court date over lawsuit alleging rape of 13-year-old I US news I The Guardian", "body": "https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/12/donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-alleged-rape-lawsuit\n\nHope all is well. We're due for a catch-up one day soon, you think?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein ([email protected]) [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "10/21/2016 11:33:11 AM", "subject": "FW: Trump lawyers given court date over lawsuit alleging rape of 13-year-old I US news I The Guardian", "body": ""}]	2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031135.txt_20502	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031135.txt	null	[{"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "6/24/2016 10:34:22 AM", "subject": null, "body": "where are you? Not answering your cell\nwhat the f... Does going to open 1k down not good... Trump is saying its a great thing really???"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033152.txt_20506	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033152.txt	null	[{"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "6/8/2019 11:53:57 PM", "subject": null, "body": "https://news.yahoo.com/confronted-with-multiple-errors-in-his-new-trump-book-a-testy-michael-wolff-says-\nyou-have-to-trust-me-181252406.html"}]	1
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022941.txt_20520	IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022941.txt	Fwd: Fw: inquiry re: Giuffre v Maxwell settlement	[{"sender": "Hill, James E.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 24, 2017 6:33 PM", "subject": "inquiry re: Giuffre v Maxwell settlement", "body": "Good afternoon, Marty:\n\nThis is James Hill at ABC News.\n\nDo you have any statement you wish to share on behalf of Mr. Epstein regarding the settlement reached in the defamation suit filed by Virginia Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell?\n\nI know from the court filings and hearing transcripts, that Mr. Epstein was deposed in this action, but was not expected to be called as a live trial witness.\n\nAccording to the transcripts - it was represented by plaintiff’s counsel during pre-trial hearings, that Mr. Epstein invoked his 5th amendment rights and declined to answer substantive questions during the deposition. It also appears that Judge Sweet had not yet made a final determination as to whether Mr. Epstein’s depo, or selected portions thereof, would be admitted at trial (which is obviously a moot point, now).\n\nIf you believe any of that to be in error, and/or if you wish to provide a statement about the settlement or in response to Giuffre’s allegations about your client, please give me a call or reply to this email.\n\nIf you have no comment, I’d appreciate you letting me know that."}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["[email protected]", "i! Sis"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 24, 2017 at 6:53 PM", "subject": "Fw: inquiry re: Giuffre v Maxwell settlement", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Matthew Hiltzik"], "timestamp": "5/24/2017 11:04:43 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: inquiry re: Giuffre v Maxwell settlement", "body": ""}]	3
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025919.txt_20521	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025919.txt	Re: Gingrich view of Trump	[{"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 4:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "I openly and proudly support Trump.\n\nI've actually been able to pull people away from Hillary by saying I'd ONLY vote for Trump or Sanders.\nCiting they everyone else is establishment politics. I convinced a lesbian woman, older, to consider Trump\nafter she went on a rampage about him. It just shows, people HAVE NO IDEA what they are talking about.\n\nMedia holds the cards.... people are sheep."}, {"sender": "{aa", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Agree\n\nSent via BlackBerry by AT&T"}, {"sender": "Philip Katka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wed, 9 Mar 2016 17:01:58", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "And I believe we have a problem\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 9, 2016, at 4:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Trump is a problem solver for sure."}, {"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 3:55 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Great one. Thanks"}]	5
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016690.txt_20524	IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016690.txt	Re: ARCOM	[{"sender": "Kirk Blouin", "recipients": ["John Page", "Police Code Enforcement"], "timestamp": "Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:09:06 PM", "subject": "Re: ARCOM", "body": "JP,\n\nHere is a copy of the minutes from the April CEB hearing. Each month thereafter the case was postponed\nbecause we were aware that it was being brought to ARCOM. Now that this matter has been resolved\nwith ARCOM we will proceed with a code enforcement case until the property is in compliance (meaning\nthey plant the shrubbery and hedges approved by the Town).\n\nSgt. Krauel or Rob Walton will be available on July 23rd as \| will be attending a conference.\n\nH. Case # 08-2484, 515 N. County Road, Trump Properties, LLC\n\nViolation of Chapter 18, Section 18-205 of the Town of Palm Beach Code of\nOrdinances, the Architectural Commission may attach conditions to any approval it grants\n(Declaration of Use Agreement).\n\nLead Code Enforcement Walton presented the facts of the case and said the previous\nowner of the property, Abe Gosman, had been granted approval by the Architectural\nCommission to do some remodeling. One of the conditions of this approval was that the\nhedge along the front of the property be maintained in the condition it was in at the time the\napproval was granted. This agreement was a binding agreement, which passes on to any\nsubsequent property owner. The agreement was made January 31, 1990. The subsequent\nbuyer of this property was Mr. Trump, Trump Properties, LLC and some remodeling work\nwas done, removing the previous hedge. A new hedge was planted to replace the original\nhedge and that one has now been removed. This is a violation of the agreement. A letter was\nreceived from Mr. Royce, representing Mr. Trump, asking for a postponement of today’s\nhearing. The Town does not feel this matter should be postponed.\n\nMr. Randolph summarized the letter from Mr. Royce which indicated the ficus\nhedge keeps dying and they want to replace it with something different. They plan on hiring a\nlandscape architect to go before the next Architectural Commission meeting to get approval to\ninstall a hedge in an attempt to meet the conditions of the declaration of use agreement. Mr.\nRandolph said he had discussions with Mr. Royce and Mr. Walton and Mr. Royce was told the\nTown could not recommend a postponement and the recommendation would be that they are\nfound in violation, assessed the $150.00 in administrative costs and be given until June 18th,\nwhich is the day before the June Code Enforcement Board meeting, to comply. This would\ngive them the opportunity to appear before the Architectural Commission to see if they can get\napproval to re-plant a hedge. The hedge has to be installed to the height which existed at the\ntime of the agreement which Mr. Randolph said he believed was twenty-two (22) feet. Mr.\nRandolph said Mr. Royce was not present today because he had a planned vacation.\n\nMOTION BY MR. FRIED TO FIND THE VIOLATOR IN NON-\nCOMPLIANCE, ASSESS ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS OF $150.00 AND GIVE THEM\nUNTIL JUNE 18, 2008 TO COMPLY.\n\nSECONDED BY MS. VAN BUREN"}]	1
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021815.txt_20525	IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021815.txt	Re: we'll see	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "notable?"}, {"sender": "[i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Definitely not gonna talk to the reporters. It doesn't feel right. Xoxoxo\n\nThey called my friend today and told her they are writing a story about notable people from the east and would like to talk to her about me. She didn't fall for it.. Slovakian press is going crazy now."}, {"sender": "[nn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Apparently...\n\nThey are now asking how my parents bought a building in town...implying it was all the money they got for selling me :)\nGetting ugly.."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "allegations . She claimed in the minutest of detail , her dinner with President Clinton on the Caribean Island, How he arrived . ( by black heli). where he sat. ,(on jeffreys left.) a\n\n21st century tale of power, sex, money. The fact is that this story is total make believe , fabricated on purpose to gain tabloid attention ,and easily refuted by readily availalble travel records of a former president. . it defies belief that any person would take seriously such a preposterous story. little different than her telling her father that she met the queen, whoops- he believed her though her mother at the relevant time complained that she must have been engaging in satan worship and asked that she be put her in a drug home. cmon. \| am currenty a professional pilot with a spotless record. \| have a checklist that \| follow before every flight to verify that things are what they are supposed to be , checking her story which the presss has refused to do would serve the public well. In this case human error is merely a euphmisn for hijacking the truth"}]	4
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032428.txt_20535	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032428.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "1/12/2017 2:52:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "When I go to Dubai on Emirates, do I need to go first or is business class good enough given that I only care about sleeping?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2017, at 9:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "nice"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got hired by Apple this week to do a patent trial."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2017, at 9:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i understand the fear. thats why we will condition the close on how the others sell"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What if I get it and can't resell?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2017, at 6:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im happy to negotiate with developer on your behalf. . or just give your talking points. allowances . commisions fees. free maintence etc"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not to disturb you, but I am struck by the similar mannerisms between Trump and McGyver"}]	7