Split (1)

train · 5.08k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

thread_id stringlengths 37 43	source_file stringlengths 35 37	subject stringlengths 0 231 ⌀	messages stringlengths 88 34.9k	message_count int64 1 42
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016553.txt_19421	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016553.txt	Items for August 11 Town Council Meeting.	[{"sender": "Kathleen Ruderman/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Anne Boyles/PalmBeach@PalmBeach"], "timestamp": "07/24/2008 11:49 AM", "subject": "Re: Items for August 11 Town Council Meeting.", "body": "Anne,\nI have approved SPR 14-2007 and 5-2008. The Larkin item is OK. The appeal by Brindell re 144 Wells Road should not be on the agenda. The sod/seed item is an item that Tim Frank is working on but I don't think it's an agenda item. We need to check with Peter on that one. The infrastructure of large homes is not an agenda item. Neither is the Trump appeal for 515 North County Road.\nTwo things that will be added though are: EAR Amendments and Zoning Study Items."}, {"sender": "Anne Boyles/O=PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Cheryl Kleen"], "timestamp": "Thursday, July 24, 2008 11:51:14 AM", "subject": "Items for August 11 Town Council Meeting.", "body": "FYI"}]	2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032885.txt_19425	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032885.txt	Re: Trump	[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "you think he will win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "ask again 30th"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Lets catch up next time you are in NYC. NYT is making me write more on markets now and I don't really know who to believe any more re where the market is going these days."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:38:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "no place else to invest for alpha, your children are rich"}]	6
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025199.txt_19431	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025199.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "3/2/2018 12:47:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "funn I. its a wild time"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas <IMI>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 5:58 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Jeffrey do you think this is Smoot Hawley 2 which topped us into the depression Bloomberg just quoted trump trade wars are good and easy to win thanks jf Somers is going to mar a lago lunch Saturday fund raiser for djt"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022190.txt_19436	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022190.txt	Re: we'll see	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "notable?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "DefinAely not gonna talk to the reporters. It doesn't ,eel right, Xoxoxo\n\nThey called my friend Mtoday and told her they are writing a story about notable people from the east and would like to talk to her about me. She didn't fall for it.. Slovakian press is going crazy now."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I only met Jeffrey Epstein, after I was adult. ( over 18). I was never, ever, his \" sex slave \" . obviously a lurid chauvenistic categorization, which in my opinion could only have been made by some loser of a repressed male reporter. He was always kind , funny and generous to me. These fantasy fabrications made by a delusional thief. ( charged with stealing from the burger place and which she worked, though she claimed to paid thousands of dollars in cash and held at the beck and call of the genious tycoon. ) . Her story telling had it been done while sleeping would have been called dreaming, if awake, hallucinaitons but to the English press they are referred to as allegations . She claimed in the minutest of detail , her dinner with President Clinton on the Caribean Island, How he arrived. ( by black heli). where he sat. ,(on jeffreys left.) a 21st century tale of power, sex, money. The fact is that this story is total make believe , fabricated on purpose to gain tabloid attention ,and easily refuted by readily availalble travel records of a former president. . it defies belief that any person would take seriously such a preposterous story. little different than her telling her father that she met the queen, whoops- he believed her though her mother at the relevant time complained that she must have been engaging in satan worship and asked that she be put her in a drug home. cmon. I am currenty a professional pilot with a spotless record. I have a checklist that I follow before every flight to verify that things are what they are supposed to be, checking her story which the presss has refused to do would serve the public well. In this case human error is merely a euphmisn for hijacking the truth,"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Apparently", "body": "They are now asking how my parents bought a building in town...implying it was all the money they got for selling me\nGetting ugly.."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 7:00 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "It was a first draft"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Yes, let's do it. I like most of it. Would like less personal attacks and more reasons why allegations are ridiculous.. Love the fact checking story. Just a few days ago, I toyed with the idea of posting a photo of me doing a preflight inspection and saying I wished other professions would have that requirement before putting innocent people's lives at risk."}]	6
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025827.txt_19439	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025827.txt	Re: Fwd:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014, at 1:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "You need to talk to boss"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "!understood. it comes down to high risk / reward / low risk / reward. professional , emotional. and financial"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Most girls do not have to worry about this crap."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "\"girls?\"„ careful i will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any..... also if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate summit, clinton ,security council, holy shit im oi for next 30 minutes"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you going to manage all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get sick of me... .just sat down on the train so can't talk freely."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "train? yes, i will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in room 1, gunshot in surgery, and the \"cook\" welll -- he can wait"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories, however. DC today, back in NY on Sunday morning."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Yep. And now he is a repeat offender."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:00 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "double whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Uh, yeah. We will now go through a period of self-reflection and despair."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "reid or governor"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:44 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Gov is not jewish"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "of course not, he wouldnt have been so stupid."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Correct. One time, maybe. Twice, no way."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "free now"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "I think I should do it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "lets see how you feel sunday"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Good advice."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "I don't want to give up my apartment in NY."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "no need to. call eric and get a data point"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "I will. Thc rent on the apartment is significantly more than the monthly salary."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "how much and who pays now?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Saturday, September 20 2014 12:17 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "I have so much more info to tell you on Sunday."}]	26
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033225.txt_19442	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033225.txt	I don't know if they'll publish this:	[{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["DANNY GOLDBERG", "Sam/Walli Leff Michael Simmons"], "timestamp": "2/12/2017 12:25:16 AM", "subject": "I don't know if they'll publish this:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["letterslatimes.com"], "timestamp": "February 11, 2017 at 12:56:37 PM PST", "subject": "Re:\"Comedian made an art...,\" Obituariwa, Feb. 10", "body": "The obituary of unique comedian Irwin Corey stated, \"Over a career that spanned more than 70 years, Corey performed in vaudeville, radio, television, films, Broadway, nightclubs and Las Vegas showrooms.\"\n\nIn 1983, I was fortunate to be booked as the opening act for Corey in a four-day run at the Julia Morgan Theater in Berkeley. He revealed his dark side in a room backstage, where we smoked a joint, and he told me how he used to read Nazi hate literature to get him in the mood to perform. And there was a certain sense of continuity on his deathbed. The night before he died, he said to a close friend, James Drougas, \"Trump will be assassinated soon.\"\n\n\"Professor\" Corey also had a humanitarian streak. In 1996, in my magazine, The Realist, I published a photo of him, from a video by his son Richard, presenting Fidel Castro a bag of California-grown pistachio nuts (Castro said, \"California, hmmmm, good climate there for nuts\"), a book on the Rosenberg controversy, and a credit-card-size calculator (Castro said, \"I'll have to use my little pinky to push the buttons\"). Dave Channon reported thatCorey was on a diplomatic mission to lift the embargo on health supplies to Cuba, and he visited a hospital that was providing sophisticated treatment for the survivors of Chernobyl. Cuban health care provided for more radiation victims than than did the U. .5.\""}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031661.txt_19447	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031661.txt	Re: Trump	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["paul krassner"], "timestamp": "2/16/2017 12:21:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "i was pointing out that that alleged rape was reported to be at my house with donald and I raping her."}, {"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "to what wording would you suggest I change that?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 1, 2017, at 7:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "the allegation was not at a pedophile party, it was at my house with me."}]	3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032518.txt_19457	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032518.txt	Small biz and Trump	[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "3/9/2017 3:29:54 PM", "subject": "Small biz and Trump", "body": "It’s getting better\nAn index of small-business optimism jumped to 105.8 in December. Indexed to 100 in 1986\n110\n\n100\n\n90\n\n80 ; :\n86 2000 16\nSource: NFIB Note: Data are seasonally adjusted. CNBC\n\nI was in Toledo Ohio yesterday drilling down on small business animal spirits: amazing how bullish\nthey are there -- for all of DJT's craziness, his ability to present himself as a small biz owner pissed off\nabout regulations/health care/anti-business sentiment in White House was a brilliant stroke. They\nreally dig him down there...."}]	1
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021223.txt_19459	IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021223.txt	Re: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners	[{"sender": "The Sidney Hillman Foundation", "recipients": ["Michael"], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 2:45 PM", "subject": "Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Congratulations to the 2019 Hillman Prize recipients!"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 23, 2019, at 8:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Another big prize for Miami Herald."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 2:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Pile on"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 23, 2019, at 9:06 AM", "subject": "Re: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Look at the judges on this thing: the right-thinking establishment to a tee (to a Ta-Nihisi)."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "4/23/2019 4:06:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Fix always in"}]	5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025172.txt_19464	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025172.txt	Re: Your Special Day	[{"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:07 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nCongratulations on another spin around the sun.\n\nI would like to offer you a birthday present: my best efforts for a few hours on something where I might be able to contribute either to making something good happen for you or help you prevent the bad.\n\nWe haven't talked much at all for quite some time, so I'm not sure of the nature of your current interests but here are some of mine, where I feel I either have some special capability or can get access to those who have such.\n\n* open science -- open access publishing, data publishing, and open culture institutions considered as a network with largely consistent and mutually reinforcing values: Public Library of Science (PLoS), Wikipedia, Internet Archive, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Creative Commons, along with allied US, UK, European governmental and NGO funding sources and other institutions.\n* early-stage life science-based ventures, especially those with one or more of these technologies: optics, wearable-sensors, brain-computer interface, behavioral engineering that goes beyond robo-noodging. I am not up to speed on synthetic bio and CRISPR, but I have a good friend who is.\n* cybersecurity for you and your life. I have carefully monitored the web for articles about you and I have reason to think that those will persist indefinitely. I would be remiss as your friend if I did not encourage you to be as diligent and smart as possible in using tools like Signal, two-factor/multi-factor authentication, taking webmail archives off the web onto your own secure privately maintained archive or deleted (unlike Podesta), and other measures.\n* publicity for your cool-ass creative and important philanthropy in support of really good and adventuresome, high-risk basic science research. Most obvious benefit: it would be nice to know you hung out with the bright"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 10:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "all good. thx. areas of interest, distributions in nature. 2 deception. 3. sleep . 4. power. 5 money. 6 music and the brain. 7, signal intelligence in the biological systems"}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Excellent alignment with some of my interests or those of people I like and think are smart!\n\nThe rest of the truncated message has been sent.\n\n1. What's been stimulating as a source of good questions for the \"distributions in nature\" issue?\n7. \"Signal intelligence in biol. systems\" seems to cover all of neurophysiology: Jonathan Victor, whom you met a few years ago in your office, is powerfully thoughtful on the issues of neural coding. Are there specific examples that have stimulated you to better questions or turned your thinking around?\n\n6. Are you aware of apps that purport to play music to enhance productivity and focus on tasks at hand? My buddy Reese Jones has backed that; he has a fascinating set of beliefs and projects around what may soon be understood as \"consciousness hacking.\" He's on the board of Singularity University as one of the founders. (His father was a pioneer UCSF MD researcher of hallucinogens, I believe!)\n\nMore to come in a day or so.\n\nThanks!\n\nYou're up late or you're not so east of my SF location!\n\nDavid\n\nPS How to trade the Trump-GOP demolition of the welfare state, erratic elevation of risks of trade disruptions and war? Has anyone from the rational center or left given thought to how to respond to a national emergency to cope with a kakistocratic seizure of emergency powers? The Patriot Act was on a 'shelf as you know, ready to be used. What should the better folks in this country have at hand if, say, a port is subject to a radiological attack of unknown origin?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 2:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "1. is probability a force rather than a marker. if you look at a bell curve from scratch, it looks as if it under a force pushing things towards the center. i think gravity might be just that. 2. all signals in nature need to be encrypted so that the enemy cannot read. this includes inner signals that if you are aware of, can give you up to your predator. so signals from the nose , my conjecture is that each person has its own encryption de encryption algorithm built in. fyi having dinner with Jim Watson."}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Probability as a force rather than a what?\nDidn't suss out the next word...\n\nWatson's pretty wild and fun, if overconfident about some ideas about autism when I saw him talk —4 years ago on book tour @Google. I met him once through Gunther Stent, as well as Crick on another occasion. Know him well?\n\nD."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 4:10 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "pretty well"}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Cool. And the former question, of clarification?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "1/20/2017 12:14:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "probability and statistics gets its strength from the law of large numbers. centrifugal force is a pseudo force but not distinguishable in the right frame. like gravity, lets assume that there is a force pushing heads and tails towards a 50 50 distribution. not merely recording it. regression to the mean. etc. would. could be a force similar to the EM one."}]	8
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026509.txt_19470	IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026509.txt	Re: This morning	[{"sender": "LHS <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Maskin, Eric"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 11, 2018 7:52 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "I get that formal argument\n\nWhat about aspects not quite in model.\n\nMore folk will run from extremes if they can attract more First run votes. Candidates can position a bit. Separately I pitched this to someone today.\n\nHe said he had heard that because of its greater complexity African American and lower income turnout was depressed. Is there evidence on turnout impacts?"}, {"sender": "Maskin, Eric <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["LHS <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2018, at 10:20 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "Yes, we can expect more extremists to run under RCV. But also more centrists (e.g., Bloomberg). Since the centrists are closer to the median voter, they will defeat the extremists.\n\nThe evidence I have seen suggests that RCV increases turn-out. [But it’s important that voters be given the choice to rank as many or few candidates as they like, so that a voter always has the option of voting for a single candidate (in effect, he would be ranking all other candidates as tied for second). In practice, most voters choose to rank two or three candidates, but a significant fraction just rank one]\n\nIn fact the increase in the diversity of candidates under RCV is related to turn-out. If RCV had been used in 2016, Bernie Sanders could have run as an independent in the general election without fear of guaranteeing a Trump victory. Many of the Bernie supporters who stayed home on election day might then have voted---and presumably would have ranked Clinton second. This would have given Ker a victory over Trump in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania (and possibly elsewhere).\n\nEric"}]	2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029905.txt_19481	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029905.txt	Fwd: Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal’	[{"sender": "paul krassner ie", "recipients": ["J [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "3/7/2019 4:27:09 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal’", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Ann Coulter", "recipients": ["\"Friend\""], "timestamp": "March 6, 2019 at 5:01:34 PM PST", "subject": "Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a \"Trump Scandal’", "body": "Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile\nBecame a \"Trump Scandal'\n\nStrangely, the media have suddenly taken an intense interest in the case of pedophile and\nmajor Democratic donor Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nIn 2005, the Palm Beach police were told by the mother of a young girl in West Palm\nBeach that her daughter had been brought to the Democratic donor's mansion and asked\nto have sex with him for money. This kicked off an intensive, one-year undercover\ninvestigation.\n\nThe police sifted through Epstein'’s garbage and interviewed 17 witnesses, including the\nhousemen, who told of sex toys and dildos left behind after the underage girls left. One of\nEpstein's procurers, a 20-year-old local woman named Haley Robson, who was paid $200"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025166.txt_19485	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025166.txt	Re: Re: cash	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016 12:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: cash", "body": "im in wed, fri. edelman?"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 1:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will check"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016 12:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "barrack and the boys in pb, wild wild."}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Read an interesting article on why Comey screwed Clinton. Came from Israeli press.\n1. Comey as DA is hunting down Marc Rich to indict him.\n2. Ehud calls Clinton and says please pardon Marc Rich he has done work for Mossad that has been valuable.\n3. Clinton pardons Rich and Comey has been pissed ever since.\n4. Comey got his opening to get even.\nNo idea if this is accurate story.\ntjp"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016 12:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "comey knows that denise neeed to pledge 500k to foundation"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 1:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Cash or in-kind services?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 6:49:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "cash"}]	7
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033174.txt_19492	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033174.txt	Isn't it great that...	[{"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "10/8/2016 3:45:09 PM", "subject": "Isn't it great that...", "body": "Trump is owning the headlines this weekend??\n\nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025600.txt_19502	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025600.txt	Re: $25K from ASU	[{"sender": "Joichi Ito <joi@...>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:10 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Hey Jeffrey.\n\nHow are things?\n\nJust to let you know. We were able to keep the Leon Black money, but the $25K from your foundation is getting bounced by MIT back to ASU.\n\nSorry...\n\n- Joi"}, {"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:18 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "No problem- Trying to get more black for you"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:24 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Thanks!"}, {"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 7:45 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "brutal press. . sorry. it seems im a symbol for all ills. :). if you hate the rich, the men , the trump types im your boy. at least for the moment. . hope you are well"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:08 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "I'm good. Good luck!\n\n- Joi"}, {"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 18, 2019, at 08:03", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/18/opinion/sunday/oliver- sacks-gardens.html?action=click &module=Opinion &pgtyp e=Homep age"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 8:23 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Nice."}, {"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 06:48", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "i can have andrew farkas , he gave a building to the hasty pudding harvard. fund plant guys. how are you >?"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 6 2019 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "That would be great. I've been busy, but good. How are you? Heard you saw Madars."}]	9
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023041.txt_19508	IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023041.txt	Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell	[{"sender": "Alan Dershowitz", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 05:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 08:37:01 -0800", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "GMAX <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["J Jep <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe,\n\nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine\n\nMaxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend.\n\nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following questions. Our deadline is noon\n\ntomorrow. My telephone numbers are\n\nAnnette Witheridge\nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday"}]	5
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032524.txt_19510	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032524.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Joshua Cooper Ram", "recipients": ["jeffrey ."], "timestamp": "4/10/2017 9:29:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "In Europe. You well?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 00:46", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you playing a part in the xi trump. fun"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026321.txt_19512	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026321.txt	This morning	[{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["Maskin, Eric"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 11, 2018 4:16 PM", "subject": "This morning", "body": "It was fun and interesting. \nI admire your friends determination. \nAre you serious about working on this? \nHas anyone done a full analysis of this and polarization. \nSeems like on one hand it might encourage Ralph Nader cuz he d get more first round votes and not elect George \nbush. This might be bad. \nOn other hand, gore would not have to move left to take Nader vote. \nIf I like centrism is it clear that this is better. \nI get that it avoids arbitrary outcomes but assume that a tea party nut is as likely to elect a dem as a lefty is to elect et a \nrepublican. \nAnyway thanks for setting up. \nBtw I gave them 10,000."}, {"sender": "Maskin, Eric", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 11, 2018 6:05 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "Hi Larry, \nThank you very much for taking the meeting this morning. I'm glad you found it worthwhile, and I agree with you that \nAdam Friedman's commitment to the project is impressive. \nI AM serious about working on this---it's a nice opportunity to make important practical use of some interesting theory. \nVoting rules may seem nerdy and dry, but they can make an enormous difference to actual politics \nThe formal argument that RCV promotes centrism better than the current system (plurality rule) is straightforward. \nSuppose that most voters vote ideologically in the sense that the closer a candidate is to their own position on the left-\nright spectrum, the more like they are to vote for him. Then under majority rule (my favorite voting system)---in which \nvoters rank candidates and the winner is the candidate who beats all other in pairwise comparisons----the winner will be \nthe median voter's favorite candidate -----in other words, the most centrist candidate gets elected (this assumes that \nthere are enough candidates running so that there is one who is reasonably close to the median voter). Now observe \nthat RCV is in between majority rule and plurality rule, and so will promote centrism better than plurality rule. \nBest wishes, Eric"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["Maskin, Eric"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 11, 2018 7:52 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "I get that formal argument \nWhat about aspects not quite in model. \nMore folk will run from extremes if they can attract more First run votes. Candidates can position a bit. \nSeparately I pitched this to someone today. \nHe said he had heard that because of its greater complexity African American and lower income turnout was depressed. \nIs there evidence on turnout impacts?"}, {"sender": "Maskin, Eric", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "September 11, 2018 at 10:20 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "Yes, we can expect more extremists to run under RCV. But also more centrists (e.g., Bloomberg). Since the centrists are \ncloser to the median voter, they will defeat the extremists. \nThe evidence I have seen suggests that RCV increases turn-out. [But it's important that voters be given the choice to \nrank as many or few candidates as they like, so that a voter always has the option of voting for a single candidate (in \neffect, he would be ranking all other candidates as tied for second). In practice, most voters choose to rank two or three \ncandidates, but a significant fraction just rank one] \nIn fact the increase in the diversity of candidates under RCV is related to turn-out. If RCV had been used in 2016, Bernie \nSanders could have run as an independent in the general election without fear of guaranteeing a Trump victory. Many \nof the Bernie supporters who stayed home on election day might then have voted---and presumably would have ranked \nClinton second. This would have given her a victory over Trump in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania (and possibly \nelsewhere)."}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["Maskin, Eric"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 11, 2018 10:23 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "Are there empirical studies on turnout."}, {"sender": "Maskin, Eric", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "September 11, 2018 at 10:24:21 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: This morning", "body": "I believe there are, but don't know how careful they are. I will try to get you references."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "9/12/2018 3:01:20 AM", "subject": "Fwd: This morning", "body": "More than u may want to know"}]	7
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033594.txt_19518	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033594.txt	Michael Boccio	[{"sender": "Eric Roth", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "8/7/2011 4:01:33 PM", "subject": "Michael Boccio", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nRecently while refurbishing Donald Trump's 757 I worked closely with his Director of Business Development / \nSpecial Counsel, Michael Boccio. \nAlthough I have worked with some very intelligent and creative individuals, Michael is a real stand out — he is \nimpressive on many levels. \nSomeone (or organization) is going to be excited to have someone with Michael's capabilities working for them \nand thought that you may need someone like Michael on your team or have a friend who may be in search of a \ndynamic individual with his background and talent. \nPlease take a moment to read the attached documents to see if Michael is someone you are looking for. If not, \nI ask that you forward this e-mail to someone you believe would greatly benefit by having Michael work for \nthem. \nI know that I always appreciate when a friend refers someone who can be of great help to me — personally or in \nbusiness. \nIf you have any questions about working with Michael, please do not hesitate to call me. \nThank you."}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026447.txt_19522	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026447.txt	null	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Leon Black"], "timestamp": "6/7/2017 12:03:23 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Blackstone anticipates that the program will have $40 billion in total equity commitments in a permanent \ncapital vehicle, including $20 billion to be raised from other investors,\" Blackstone said in a statement \nannouncing the planned launch of the investment fund. \"The MOU is non-binding and the parties will continue \ntheir negotiation to agree definitive documentation.\" \nBrookings Institution Senior Fellow Bruce Riedel was even less charitable. \"There is no deal. It's fake news,\" he \nwrote in a scathing piece on the Brookings website. \"I've spoken to contacts in the defense business and on the \nHill, and all of them say the same thing: there are a bunch of letters of interest or intent, but not contracts. Many \nare offers that the defense industry thinks the Saudis will be interested in someday.\" \nIt could be years before anyone knows for sure whether the preliminary agreements announced in Saudi Arabia \nhave become real deals worth hundreds of billions, or whether the announcements were the kind of hyperbole \nTrump perfected during his time in the business world."}]	1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033148.txt_19535	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033148.txt	null	[{"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 12:32:45 PM", "subject": null, "body": "read the times interview. I would think about pointing to the stormy daniels. denial by trump his staff and\naides. would it have made sense to go back to them? no would they admit no did they admit no , did they\nobfuscate yes. did they deny , yes so checking with the subject when you have to goods only confuses the\n\nreader ?"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033580.txt_19538	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033580.txt	Trump Tells Tech Chiefs He Will Foster Innovation - The Wall Street Journal.	[{"sender": "David Fiszel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 8:37:33 AM", "subject": "Trump Tells Tech Chiefs He Will Foster Innovation - The Wall Street Journal.", "body": "This is pretty cool, Palantir was the only private company invited to yesterday's tech summit. That seems like a \nhuge change post election and bigger oppty. Let's hang in PB."}]	1
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026168.txt_19539	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026168.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "~~ ff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "only for you .. trump is on the phone today .. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one table in\nnew york including my dear old man to put an end to this"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["~~ ff"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2017, at 11:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im certain you understand - I'm sure you will have a great new year . No need to respond"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["iii"], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "the book worked. :)"}, {"sender": "iii", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thnx jeff ..im prayingpiaid"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["es"], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "only you please"}, {"sender": "es", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "9/21/2017 7:23:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hey shiek .. 1 will be in new york saturday for a day trip .. i can drop by to say hello saturday night .. if you\nbussy dont worry, we can meet in kuwait in nov inshalla"}]	6
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032846.txt_19540	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032846.txt	Fwd: Fw: Meet?	[{"sender": "Mosk, Matthew", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 20, 2016 6:08 PM", "subject": "Meet?", "body": "Mr. Weinberg — \nI am a reporter with the ABC News investigative unit. We are gathering background research on the major \ncandidates for President. \nSeeing that both former President Clinton and Mr. Trump have been mentioned in connection to the Jeffrey \nEpstein case, I am interested in better understanding the case, it's current status, and any information that \ncould help explain Mr. Epstein's dealings and interactions with both men. \nI would very much appreciate the chance to meet and discuss this subject in an off the record conversation at \nyour earliest convenience. \nPlease let me know if that would be possible, and if so, when and where we could meet. \nMany thanks, \nMatthew"}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:18 PM", "subject": "Fw: Meet?", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/21/2016 1:54:27 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Meet?", "body": ""}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031649.txt_19545	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031649.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Oct 9, 2016, at 8:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no, im out of it. donald brought out four women that said bill abused them. / they wilil feature in the \nhillary says you should give the benefit of the doubt to victims. I laid this out for you over dinner, its \ndisgraceful, but. here we are"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:45 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got it. \nNow remember \nPress is so revolted by trump that I'd expect they will not be for benefit of doubt."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ehud in on sun pritzker mon. you around? dinner woody sunday. or have you gone dark"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Times bad. R u around Tuesday?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 10:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No , -phone today?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can call circa 11"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 9:26:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "was that circa 11?"}]	7
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029087.txt_19546	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029087.txt	Greetings from Japan	[{"sender": "Jeremy Rubin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "2/1/2017 5:18:08 AM", "subject": "Greetings from Japan", "body": "Hey Jeffrey,\nThought I'd check in and see what's up on your end.\n\n- I've been watching closely Trump's appointees and there, he might be putting Balaji (a big bitcoiner)\nas FDA head, and Allison seems to be somewhat in favor of something like Bitcoin. And of course,\nThiel has said that Bitcoin is what Paypal should have been... Curious to hear where your head is at\non this matter.\n\n- Last week, \| presented my research at Stanford's BPASE, it was well received. The most interesting\nthing \| came up with for that is an inverse-input contract; i.e., funds that are \"locked\" to be spent only\nin the case where there are other funds that are not used in a specific way. An example of something\nthat could be built with this: a matching donation contract, where you agree to donate your money to\n\ncharity if someone else donates to charity, and you would not be able to release your funds from that\nagreement until they use their funds not for charity.\n\n- I'm in Japan this week, teaching a class to 100 Japanese Engineers to get the up to speed on\nbitcoin (with DG). It's very interesting to see the trepidation first hand that they have with respect to\nthe technology, despite their debit-based society being more geared for it in any case (DG felt that\neven putting Bitcoin in the course name would scare away students). One of my friends (a hedge\nfund manager) told me that female japanese engineers are very good, and drastically under-valued. \|\nmade sure to get a few invited to the class, we'll see if he's right. On the whole, it will be interesting to\nsee the caliber of engineer Japan has to offer on this front.\n\nBest,\n\nJeremy"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031281.txt_19554	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031281.txt	Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!	[{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "8/17/2016 4:01:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF\nEPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 17, 2016, at 11:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF\nEPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}]	2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032530.txt_19555	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032530.txt	null	[{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 2:43:37 PM", "subject": null, "body": "I am seeing MMM a little bit I don't think it will turn into romance I am a bit old and not tall\nenough but she seems intelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The white House\nFellowship Commison it came through Woody and Suzanne Johnson because she bundled best Jonathan"}]	1
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026381.txt_19568	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026381.txt	Re: bad	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Mar 30, 2016, at 5:05 PM", "subject": "Re: bad", "body": "http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/31/us/politics/donald-trump-abortion.html?ribbon-ad-idx=3&rref=homepage&module=Ribbon&version=origin&region=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Home%20Page&pgtype=article"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:27 AM", "subject": "Re: bad", "body": "Agreed. Trump appears to be losing momentum in polls even before that crazy comment. Think it may be\nbeginning of the end of him...\n\nhttp://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "3/31/2016 10:23:07 AM", "subject": "Re: bad", "body": "im told people think it is done on purpose so he does not win"}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030966.txt_19574	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030966.txt	Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill	[{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 8:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill", "body": "https://thehill.com/policy/finance/422577-trump-considering-firing-federal-reserve-chief-after-latest-interest-rate-hike"}, {"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 1:59:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill", "body": "should have been done months ago too old!! ! !"}]	2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032311.txt_19575	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032311.txt	null	[{"sender": "Andres Serrano", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "10/10/2016 8:09:15 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Jeffrey, \nwas prepared to vote against Trump for all the right reasons but I'm so disgusted by the outrage over \n\"grab them by the pussy\" that I may give him my sympathy vote. \nI'm sure Bill c said things, too."}]	1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032915.txt_19586	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032915.txt	Re: Trump	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 2:53:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "no intel but lots of profits"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon <P", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Any further intel on Treasury? Priebus choice suggests to me that he may go for a bigger name in\ntreasury than Mnuchin. Someone to underscore/push forward this notion that he is Reagan 2.0 (as\nsome are suggesting). I am just not sure who that person would be. The Trump trade certainly seems\nto have legs -- all the Hillary loving hedgies I am talking to are congratulating themselves for making\nso much money last week. They are all Trump lovers now!"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030972.txt_19588	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030972.txt	Re: FYI	[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 11:07 AM", "subject": "Re: FYI", "body": "Books and newspaper accounts of Trump's 45 years in business were full of his shady dealings, and the presidency had only helped to highlight them and to surface even juicier ones. Real estate was the world's favorite money laundering currency and Trump's B-level real estate business was quite explicitly designed to appeal to money launderers. What's more, Trump's own financial woes, and desperate efforts to maintain billionaire lifestyle, cache, and market viability, forced him into constant and unsubtle schemes. Practically speaking, you couldn't miss him, as the Mueller investigation appeared to be finding.\n\nIn November 2004, for instance, Jeffrey Epstein, the financier later caught in a scandal involving under-age prostitutes, agreed to buy out of bankruptcy a house in Palm Beach, Florida for $30 million—a house that had been on the market for two years. Epstein and Trump had been close friends—playboys in arms, as it were—for more than a decade, with Epstein often counseling Trump on his chaotic financial affairs. Epstein took Trump to see the Palm Beach house to advise him on construction issues involved with moving a swimming pool. As he prepared to finalize his deal for the house, an incredulous Epstein saw a severely cash-constrained Trump bid $41 million for the property, buying it through an entity called Trump Properties LLC, financed by Deutsche Bank. Trump, Epstein knew, had been renting his name, telling Epstein he ought to do the same—that is, for an ample fee, Trump was willing to serve as a front man to disguise the actual ownership in a real estate transaction. (This was, in effect, just another variation of Trump's basic business model of licensing his name for commercial properties owned by someone else.) A furious Epstein, suspecting that the real owner was a Russian oligarch, who Trump knew, Dmitry Rybolovlev—part of the close Putin circle of government-aligned industrialists in Russia—threatened to expose the deal, then getting extensive scrutiny in Florida papers. The fight became all the more bitter when, two months later, the house was put on the market for $125 million. Well known to Trump, who often saw Epstein at his current Palm Beach house, Epstein was visited almost every day, and had been for many years, by girls who he paid for massages with happy endings—girls recruited from local restaurants, strip clubs, and, also, Trump's Mar-a-Lago. Just as the threats and enmity of the two friends increased over the house sale, Epstein found himself under investigation by local Palm Beach police. Epstein's legal problems vastly escalated as the house, with only minor improvements, was bought for $96 million by Dmitry Rybolovlev. That is, Trump had either miraculously earned $55 million, without putting up a dime, or Rybolovlev, or someone such as Rybolovlev, paid Trump Properties, LLC—actual owner unknown—$96 million, thereby providing a clean payment of $55 million to someone. Ryboloyley might have, in effect, paid himself for the house, thereby cleansing the money. Epstein, on his part, would spend 12 months in jail on a prostitution charge.\n\nAfter the election, when Bannon was introduced to Epstein, Bannon told him, \"You were the one person I was truly afraid of coming forward during the campaign.\"\n\n\"And rightly so,\" said Epstein."}, {"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "2/1/2019 4:11:28 PM", "subject": "Re: FYI", "body": "Needs edit but ... ie 36! M Ryboloev not known in 05 , Talk later"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019338.txt_19589	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019338.txt	Re: Fw:	[{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 22, 2018 15:38", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What does this say???"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 01:51:58 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "9th circle"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Abandon Hope, All Ye Who Enter"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:58 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Hicks?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Mon, 23 Jul 2018 02:02:16 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "If you are going to play here , you'll have to spend time, europe by remote doesn't work Lots and lots of face time and hand holding"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 2:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018, at 6:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "its doable , but time consuming, there are many leaders of countries we can organize for you to have one on ones. however. you will have to come , stay 8 -10 days. , then no more than two weeks later. the same. The fear is that you gin up their hopes and emotions and then abandon them. I think you want to be an insider, not an outsider flying in and out. did you get the first cut of american carnage?.?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018, at 1:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Agree 100%\nHow do I do that???\nAmerican Carnage amazing -- An Emmanual financed it and he loves it---Erolls besties tell him it will end his career because he gave a platform to a monster\nOfficially in Venice, Toronto and New York Film Festival\nSkipping telluride"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018, at 9:49 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "We can talk about at your convenience"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 3:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "7/23/2018 1:58:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "011-331-441-70210. In 2 hrs"}]	11
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028602.txt_19598	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028602.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Crim"}, {"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you seemed to imply that your new guy could only shoot blanks? ifthats so. its an easy decision. , if not. oy"}, {"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you think he has the goods?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not my new guy...not repping him"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "So....remarkably...in the middle of dealing with thiss the Steptoe numbercrunchers advise me Jeffrey has paid about 450 and owes about 300 and seems disinclined to make Steptoe whole.....Ahhhhmmmm....first reaction is déja vu.... How the fuck are we back here after the unspeakably awful evan barr debacle.... More to the point just tell me where you are on this....did miller fuck up? Something else? As you know \| am the 800 pound gorilla here, Steptoe is not going to chase you down for the money but there are 500 lawyers here, processes, etc......"}]	6
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032213.txt_19599	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032213.txt	null	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 10:39:13 AM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}]	1
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021790.txt_19601	IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021790.txt	Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- \| apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable	[{"sender": "Michael Reiter/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Margie"], "timestamp": "07/10/2008 02:36PM", "subject": "Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": "\" As you know, nothing too big or too small for us, especially in the summer\" Hmmmmm. I have to be\ndirect -- you or someone at your paper was very astute in checking the Clerk and Comptroller's computer\nand activity in the Epstein case two days before the hearing. As result, you sent me a text message on\nSaturday asking what the activity was about and I confirmed that the plea would take place. You were\nthe only member of the news media that I talked with. And yet, after the case is completely over, the\nPalm Beach Daily News' editorial staff remains silent on the topic.\n\nThanks,\n\nMike"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:58 AM", "subject": "Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["\"Alan M. Dershowitz\" Fr Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:59 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Robert D. Critton Jr. iE - Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "2/26/2010 6:37:49 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- \| apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": ""}]	4
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022808.txt_19606	IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022808.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://people.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-mcgowan/ the same boies that represents I. who makes totally fabricated claims re gore and clinton - boies clients. he refuses to ask them their version of events. They were never on the island and though she gave details of adinnner. I have never ever met al gore or his wife.\n\nboies is going to be in the firiing line. from the biz view he represented Hank Greenburg AIG, , his fees were never paid as the appeals court overturned the win. but AIG as aninsurance co. --_ ... phone only"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "iam more interested in al-waleed/saudi purge/Jared axis. al-waleed and prez go back a ways don't they?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:55 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "As they are both bulkshitters"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Did your Saudi friends survive the purge?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All. With gods help ;)"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "11/8/2017 1:48:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Re Boies, Voila. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/07/business/weinstein-lawyer-david-boies.html.\nUnclear to me why he is getting involved with you...."}]	6
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029534.txt_19609	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029534.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Mohamed Waheed Hassan", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:49 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey,\nNeed your advice.\nMy finance minister is telling me that he has an anonymous funds manager who is willing to deposit 4 billion\ndollars in Maldives and that they are willing to lend a percentage of that in exchange for government\npromissory notes. The 4 billion would be deposited in the Central Bank. But they want us to set up a special\npurpose vehicle, a construction company fully owned by the government to receive the loan. Such a company\ncan only be set up under a presidential decree.\n\nI am also told that the funds manager would be charging Maldives upfront a certain percentage of the amount\nlent.\n\nI don't feel I have enough information on this. I don't know who is this funds manager. They always want the\nfinance minister to meet them in Bangkok or some place outside. Why would anyone want to deposit such a\nlarge amount here when we don't have a credit rating and public debt is so high. I feel very uncomfortable\nabout this.\n\nWhat do you think I should do. Iam very uncomfortable. In addition to the finance minister, a leading\npolitician and leader of the coalition parliamentary group is behind it. He could be my leading contender for\npresidency.\n\nDoes this sound all ridiculous to you. I have a strange feeling about this whole thing.\n\nBest regards\n\nWaheed"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Mohamed Waheed"], "timestamp": "Jan 27, 2013, at 9:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "this from a fraud web site, your mimister will get upset that you dont want to at least try, what do we have to\nlose , always the pitch. THe following from the fraud site. --The essential fact in all advance-fee fraud\noperations is that the promised money transfer never happens—because the money does not exist. The\nperpetrators rely on the fact that, by the time the victim realizes this (often only after being confronted by a third\nparty who has noticed the transactions or conversation and recognized the scam), the victim may have sent\nthousands of dollars of their own money, and sometimes thousands or millions more that has been borrowed or\nstolen, to the scammer via an untraceable and/or irreversible means such as wire transfer.7! Stay\n\naway, however if you want to embarass your possible opponent , you might set it up so that he looks like a\nfool, ask for amemo of why he thinks you should agree , have it include as many detials as possible, so that\nwhen you prove its a fraud,, you will make him look very silly as opposed to his saying , you missed an\nopportunity, anyway,, glad you are well"}, {"sender": "Mohamed Waheed", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "1/27/2013 4:33:18 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thank you. You are my savior. I will do exactly what you said."}]	3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031732.txt_19612	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031732.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 7:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Went to opening of war paint last night was sitting next to john Connolly at after party he is on to his next book about\nEf Hutton murders apparently was going to put me in your book because \| was in your visitors list but somers and\nMargo nederlander asked him not to which pisses me off \| have never been in a big book before and \| think it would\nhave been great and they never even asked me \| told him about how you called Apple best jonathan"}, {"sender": "[email protected]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 8:06:20 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im happy to meet him"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 8:11 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do you want me to arrange it? be careful jf"}, {"sender": "[email protected]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 8:21:25 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "why dont you suggest to him that the real money making book is getting to the truth ofthe claims. — unvierstiy of\nvirgina. no penalty for fals accusations. . hockey team no penalty for accusations. . trump 13 yeara old rape\naccusation no penaltiy etc. mineis ripe with same"}, {"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 12:28:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i asked him about trump and russians he said maybe some truth there, If you want to meet him just give me the wordjf"}]	5