ID студента
int64 1k
1.03k
| ID треда
int64 2.18k
3.11k
| ID реплики в треде
int64 1
14
| Имя автора
stringclasses 41
values | Статус автора
stringclasses 3
values | ID предложения
int64 0
12
| Текст
stringlengths 3
571
| категории эмпатии/антипатии
stringclasses 42
values | виды речевых актов
stringclasses 25
values | модус/диктум
float64 | обоснование (слово, фраза, предложение)
stringclasses 32
values | эмпатия
float64 -1
1
⌀ | лингвистическая ошибка (тип)
stringclasses 3
values | текст с примером ошибки
stringclasses 3
values | исправление
stringclasses 3
values | neg
float64 0
0.57
| neu
float64 0
1
| pos
float64 0
1
| compound
float64 -0.88
0.92
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,020
| 3,023
| 1
|
bee
|
client
| 1
|
Can nuitrack sdk achieve this?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,020
| 3,023
| 2
|
TAG
|
leader
| 0
|
Hi, currently it isn’t supported.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.635
| 0.365
| 0.3182
|
1,020
| 3,023
| 2
|
TAG
|
leader
| 1
|
We had multiple internal prototypes, but decided not to proceed due to the
limited achievable accuracy (for most conventional depth sensors),
low demand.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.235
| 0.662
| 0.103
| -0.4215
|
1,020
| 3,023
| 2
|
TAG
|
leader
| 2
|
Only some limited options (such as thumb tracking in Kinect v2) could be robust enough for production usage.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.094
| 0.788
| 0.118
| 0.128
|
1,020
| 3,023
| 2
|
TAG
|
leader
| 3
|
In principle it could proceeded through custom development, so if you have some particular volume demand - please feel free to contact us directly through feedback form.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.048
| 0.772
| 0.18
| 0.6249
|
1,021
| 3,110
| 1
|
emanuel.gollob
|
client
| 0
|
Hello everyone,
I use the Nuitrack C# sample with the AI skeleton tracker and would like to limit the maximum CPU usage.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.894
| 0.106
| 0.3612
|
1,021
| 3,110
| 1
|
emanuel.gollob
|
client
| 1
|
I found this setting in the nuitrack.config but couldn´t find any explanation for it:
“CPU”: {
“MaxLoad”: -1.0
},
I guess -1.0 means no restriction at all, but how could I set it to, e.g.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.939
| 0.061
| 0.3007
|
1,021
| 3,110
| 1
|
emanuel.gollob
|
client
| 2
|
60% of my maximum CPU power?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,021
| 3,110
| 1
|
emanuel.gollob
|
client
| 3
|
Thank you!
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.264
| 0.736
| 0.4199
|
1,021
| 3,110
| 2
|
a.bragin
|
member
| 0
|
Hi @emanuel.gollob
You’re correct -1.0 means no restriction.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.794
| 0.206
| 0.2057
|
1,021
| 3,110
| 2
|
a.bragin
|
member
| 1
|
We recommend not to change it, as it can affect tracking quality.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.815
| 0.185
| 0.3612
|
1,021
| 3,110
| 2
|
a.bragin
|
member
| 2
|
To enable load restriction you can set this parameter to the value between 1.0 and 0.0, lower value means lower CPU usage.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.23
| 0.601
| 0.17
| -0.1779
|
1,022
| 2,801
| 1
|
Mayar
|
client
| 0
|
HI,
I’m curious to know if Nuitrack will add joints to the skeleton tracker in the future.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.874
| 0.126
| 0.3182
|
1,022
| 2,801
| 1
|
Mayar
|
client
| 1
|
Kinect Body Tracker SDK also detects the eyes, ears, and feet, which are very useful joints for my application.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.849
| 0.151
| 0.4927
|
1,022
| 2,801
| 1
|
Mayar
|
client
| 2
|
Currently, Nuitrack skeleton tracker doesn’t return these joints.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,022
| 2,801
| 1
|
Mayar
|
client
| 3
|
Thanks
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0
| 1
| 0.4404
|
1,022
| 2,801
| 2
|
TAG
|
leader
| 0
|
Hi @Mayar
some of that features are accessible through Instance-based API 9 and we plan to extend this functionality.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.914
| 0.086
| 0.1779
|
1,022
| 2,801
| 2
|
TAG
|
leader
| 1
|
Do you need only 2d joint positions (on image) for your application or fully specified 3d joint positions which are consistent with the rest of the skeleton?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,023
| 2,824
| 1
|
dzc
|
client
| 0
|
Recently,I use nuitrack tool to test some features.when i wear black pants,the test didn’t looks well,we can’t see the deep info of the user’s lower part,just have upper part,the test distance was about 3 meters away from camera.But when the user go close to the camera the deep info looks normal.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.042
| 0.958
| 0
| -0.296
|
1,023
| 2,824
| 2
|
TAG
|
leader
| 0
|
Hi @dzc,
it is known issue for some combinations of depth sensors and clothes material.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,023
| 2,824
| 2
|
TAG
|
leader
| 1
|
It would be helpful to attach some depth maps to check if there is non-zero depth data in these regions.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.872
| 0.128
| 0.4215
|
1,023
| 2,824
| 2
|
TAG
|
leader
| 2
|
As a possible workaround - Nuitrack AI doesn’t 100% rely on depth data to estimate skelton (it also uses RGB data), did you try Nuitrack AI in your conditions?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,023
| 2,824
| 3
|
dzc
|
client
| 0
|
Hi@TAG，
thanks for your response and help,actually i use Nuitrack AI license.for your suggestion i would add a test video on the attchment,you cound check it.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.896
| 0.104
| 0.4404
|
1,023
| 2,824
| 3
|
dzc
|
client
| 1
|
Thank you~
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.286
| 0.714
| 0.3612
|
1,024
| 3,071
| 1
|
Sergiy
|
client
| 0
|
Also Sample with AI Object Detection still doesn’t work…
Error: Exit code: 3
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.184
| 0.816
| 0
| -0.4019
|
1,024
| 3,071
| 2
|
a.bragin
|
member
| 0
|
Hi @Sergiy
AI Object Detection can predict following classes: “bottle”, “cigarette”, “phone”, “laptop”, “bag”, “book”.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,024
| 3,071
| 2
|
a.bragin
|
member
| 1
|
Regarding Object Detection sample please try to execute the application by path: %NUITRACK_HOME%\bin\nuitrack_sample.exe from cmd and send us the output
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.892
| 0.108
| 0.3182
|
1,024
| 3,071
| 3
|
Sergiy
|
client
| 0
|
Hi
Unfortunately, I can’t run an object recognition example.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.231
| 0.769
| 0
| -0.34
|
1,024
| 3,071
| 3
|
Sergiy
|
client
| 1
|
I get an error:
WARNING: Cannot load library module: C:\Program Files\Nuitrack\nuitrack\nuitrack/middleware/NuitrackModuleGPU.dll
WARNING: Cannot load library module: C:\Program Files\Nuitrack\nuitrack\nuitrack/middleware/NuitrackModuleGPU.dll
terminate called after throwing an instance of ‘tdv::nuitrack::TerminateException’
what(): WARNING: Cannot load library module: C:\Program Files\Nuitrack\nuitrack\nuitrack/middleware/NuitrackModuleGPU.dll
after I set CnnDetectionModule.ToUse parameter to true
PS I have all these dll-s
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.213
| 0.738
| 0.049
| -0.8519
|
1,024
| 3,071
| 4
|
a.bragin
|
member
| 0
|
Hi @Sergiy
Sorry for the late reply.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.178
| 0.822
| 0
| -0.0772
|
1,024
| 3,071
| 4
|
a.bragin
|
member
| 1
|
Have you installed CUDA and cuDNN dependencies as described here?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,024
| 3,071
| 5
|
a.bragin
|
member
| 0
|
Hi @Sergiy
Has your issue been solved?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.741
| 0.259
| 0.2732
|
1,024
| 3,071
| 5
|
a.bragin
|
member
| 1
|
Do you have any questions I can help you with?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.769
| 0.231
| 0.4019
|
1,025
| 3,077
| 1
|
firehouse750
|
client
| 0
|
Hello.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,025
| 3,077
| 1
|
firehouse750
|
client
| 1
|
Astra Pro and Nuitrack SDK 0.36.1 version is in use.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,025
| 3,077
| 1
|
firehouse750
|
client
| 2
|
However, the rotation of the depth camera and the RBG camera is different.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,025
| 3,077
| 1
|
firehouse750
|
client
| 3
|
Changing the rotation value from 0 to 90 outputs the opposite output of the two screens.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.862
| 0.138
| 0.34
|
1,025
| 3,077
| 1
|
firehouse750
|
client
| 4
|
The nuitrack.config settings are as follows.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,025
| 3,077
| 1
|
firehouse750
|
client
| 5
|
"DepthProvider": { "RotateAngle": "0", "RGB": "Auto", "Depth2ColorRegistration": false, "Mirror": false },
I’d appreciate it if you could answer.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.863
| 0.137
| 0.4019
|
1,025
| 3,077
| 2
|
TAG
|
leader
| 0
|
Hi @firehouse750, we’re sorry for some delay with reacting to this issue.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.265
| 0.735
| 0
| -0.3818
|
1,025
| 3,077
| 2
|
TAG
|
leader
| 1
|
I’d appreciate it if you could answer.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.69
| 0.31
| 0.4019
|
1,025
| 3,077
| 2
|
TAG
|
leader
| 2
|
Sure, we will reproduce and resolve as a priority matter.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.538
| 0.462
| 0.6124
|
1,025
| 3,077
| 2
|
TAG
|
leader
| 3
|
Could you please confirm specific sensor model - is it Astra Pro or newer Astra Pro Plus model?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.881
| 0.119
| 0.3182
|
1,025
| 3,077
| 3
|
firehouse750
|
client
| 0
|
“CameraID”:0
It has been resolved by changing to the option above.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.855
| 0.145
| 0.1779
|
1,025
| 3,077
| 3
|
firehouse750
|
client
| 1
|
What exactly is CameraID?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,025
| 3,077
| 4
|
vadim.bazhin
|
member
| 0
|
Hi @firehouse750,
If a webcam or other sensors are connected to the PC, then the Astra Pro sensor can capture their RGB stream instead of its own.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,025
| 3,077
| 4
|
vadim.bazhin
|
member
| 1
|
If this still happened, then using the CameraId parameter, you can insert the RGB stream index from Astra Pro to solve this problem.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.121
| 0.81
| 0.069
| -0.3237
|
1,025
| 3,077
| 4
|
vadim.bazhin
|
member
| 2
|
Unfortunately, to do this, you need to sort through several options, the correct option is usually in the range from 0 to 10.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.098
| 0.902
| 0
| -0.34
|
1,025
| 3,077
| 5
|
firehouse750
|
client
| 0
|
Thank you for your reply.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.615
| 0.385
| 0.3612
|
1,025
| 3,077
| 6
|
vadim.bazhin
|
member
| 0
|
Hi @firehouse750,
How are you?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,025
| 3,077
| 6
|
vadim.bazhin
|
member
| 1
|
Has your issue been solved?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.656
| 0.344
| 0.2732
|
1,025
| 3,077
| 6
|
vadim.bazhin
|
member
| 2
|
Would be great if you could provide some reply/feedback, we will be ready to help.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.563
| 0.437
| 0.8519
|
1,025
| 3,077
| 6
|
vadim.bazhin
|
member
| 3
|
Thanks.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0
| 1
| 0.4404
|
1,026
| 2,828
| 1
|
efilcoach
|
client
| 0
|
I am currently using nuitrack pro license
Does nuitrack ai work without problems even when there is no internet connection?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.098
| 0.801
| 0.101
| 0.015
|
1,026
| 2,828
| 1
|
efilcoach
|
client
| 1
|
Also, is there a difference between nuitrack ai and pro in the skeleton processing code?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,026
| 2,828
| 2
|
TAG
|
leader
| 0
|
Hi @efilcoach,
 efilcoach:
Does nuitrack ai work without problems even when there is no internet connection?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.113
| 0.771
| 0.116
| 0.015
|
1,026
| 2,828
| 2
|
TAG
|
leader
| 1
|
perpetual licenses doesn’t require Internet connection after initial activation (both for Pro and AI versions).
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,026
| 2,828
| 2
|
TAG
|
leader
| 2
|
 efilcoach:
Also, is there a difference between nuitrack ai and pro in the skeleton processing code?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,026
| 2,828
| 2
|
TAG
|
leader
| 3
|
AI version provides Deep Learning based skeletal tracking.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,026
| 2,828
| 2
|
TAG
|
leader
| 4
|
It has significantly greater coverage in terms of human body poses (for example - sitting, lying poses, etc)
AI version is readily available with Trial license, so you are welcome to try it out.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.085
| 0.772
| 0.144
| 0.3321
|
1,027
| 3,085
| 1
|
firehouse750
|
client
| 0
|
Hello.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,027
| 3,085
| 1
|
firehouse750
|
client
| 1
|
Can I get the old version of the Nuitrack SDK 0.28?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,027
| 3,085
| 1
|
firehouse750
|
client
| 2
|
It doesn’t seem to be in github.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,027
| 3,085
| 2
|
TAG
|
leader
| 0
|
Hi @firehouse750, sure, we don’t have it readily available.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.777
| 0.223
| 0.3182
|
1,027
| 3,085
| 2
|
TAG
|
leader
| 1
|
We’re are considering deprecation of Nuitrack versions below the certain version, as it is becoming difficult to support very old versions.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.099
| 0.711
| 0.19
| 0.3182
|
1,027
| 3,085
| 2
|
TAG
|
leader
| 2
|
Could you please tell a bit on why it is important for you to use this particular version ?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.806
| 0.194
| 0.4767
|
1,027
| 3,085
| 3
|
firehouse750
|
client
| 0
|
It’s because of compatibility.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,027
| 3,085
| 3
|
firehouse750
|
client
| 1
|
Strangely, certain PCs only run older versions (0.28).
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.214
| 0.583
| 0.204
| -0.0258
|
1,028
| 2,720
| 1
|
box.inteligente.sj
|
client
| 0
|
Hi!
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,028
| 2,720
| 1
|
box.inteligente.sj
|
client
| 1
|
This my first post and I don’t know if this particular subject was treated before but I’ve been having some problems related to performance when AI processing is activated by modifying the corresponding .config file.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.095
| 0.905
| 0
| -0.5499
|
1,028
| 2,720
| 1
|
box.inteligente.sj
|
client
| 2
|
I’m currently implementing a C++ algorithm for calculating output power and velocity from athletes.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,028
| 2,720
| 1
|
box.inteligente.sj
|
client
| 3
|
In particular measuring an exercise called deadlift.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,028
| 2,720
| 1
|
box.inteligente.sj
|
client
| 4
|
The thing is that when I run the examples provided by default in after configuring the mentioned file, everything runs smoothly as we can see in the next video.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,028
| 2,720
| 1
|
box.inteligente.sj
|
client
| 5
|
good performance video sample 7
But then, when i run my own code, things get funny.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.707
| 0.293
| 0.7003
|
1,028
| 2,720
| 1
|
box.inteligente.sj
|
client
| 6
|
I’m using version 0.35.9 of Nuitrack and OpenCV 3.4 along with ImGUI for a rapid prototyping of things.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,028
| 2,720
| 1
|
box.inteligente.sj
|
client
| 7
|
Supposedly it should draw circles on shoulders, wrists, waist and knees.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,028
| 2,720
| 1
|
box.inteligente.sj
|
client
| 8
|
I worked my program up from these simple but great examples found on git hub: link
bad performance video sample 9
Lenovo Yoga slim 7 specs:
Processor: Intel Core i7-1065G7 @ 1.3GHz
RAM: 8 GB
Anyway, my questions are:
Can performance be drawn back by just using other resources like ImGUI?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.077
| 0.779
| 0.144
| 0.631
|
1,028
| 2,720
| 1
|
box.inteligente.sj
|
client
| 9
|
(in comparison with the examples)
Is my notebook not enough for handling all this processing?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,028
| 2,720
| 1
|
box.inteligente.sj
|
client
| 10
|
Thanks a lot.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.408
| 0.592
| 0.4404
|
1,028
| 2,720
| 2
|
Mariya
|
member
| 0
|
Hi Juan!
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,028
| 2,720
| 2
|
Mariya
|
member
| 1
|
Could you please try to execute your code without Nuitrack AI and check if there is any difference.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.881
| 0.119
| 0.3182
|
1,028
| 2,720
| 2
|
Mariya
|
member
| 2
|
Also, is it okay for you to share your code with us?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.709
| 0.291
| 0.4767
|
1,028
| 2,720
| 2
|
Mariya
|
member
| 3
|
We could try to run it and investigate the problem.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.231
| 0.769
| 0
| -0.4019
|
1,028
| 2,720
| 2
|
Mariya
|
member
| 4
|
Looking forward to your response.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,029
| 2,781
| 1
|
nurdogan.erdem
|
client
| 0
|
Hello,
Is it possible to completely disable the tracking of a skeleton at runtime so that it does not consume any computing time?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,029
| 2,781
| 1
|
nurdogan.erdem
|
client
| 1
|
We are developing games that only need tracking of 1 skeleton.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,029
| 2,781
| 1
|
nurdogan.erdem
|
client
| 2
|
However, we have a game menu where we need hand tracking 2x.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.775
| 0.225
| 0.4939
|
1,029
| 2,781
| 1
|
nurdogan.erdem
|
client
| 3
|
So we also need to track 2 skeletons.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,029
| 2,781
| 1
|
nurdogan.erdem
|
client
| 4
|
So, we are doing this:
skeletonTracker.SetNumActiveUsers(2);
However, tracking a 2nd skeleton in the game causes performance problems.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.144
| 0.856
| 0
| -0.4019
|
1,029
| 2,781
| 1
|
nurdogan.erdem
|
client
| 5
|
The end hardware we use is not the strongest.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.231
| 0.769
| 0
| -0.3412
|
1,029
| 2,781
| 1
|
nurdogan.erdem
|
client
| 6
|
The value read in skeletonTracker.GetProcessingTime() doubles with 2 skeletons from 20ms to 40ms.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.833
| 0.167
| 0.34
|
1,029
| 2,781
| 1
|
nurdogan.erdem
|
client
| 7
|
Something like:
skeletonTracker.GetSkeleton(1).enabled = false;
would be very useful
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.551
| 0.449
| 0.6901
|
1,029
| 2,781
| 2
|
nurdogan.erdem
|
client
| 0
|
I may found an answer to my question 
We are using:
skeletonTracker.SetAutoTracking(true);
skeletonTracker.SetNumActiveUsers(2);
I guess setting AutoTracking to false and start/stop the tracking manually would do the job.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,029
| 2,781
| 2
|
nurdogan.erdem
|
client
| 1
|
Right?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
1,029
| 2,781
| 2
|
nurdogan.erdem
|
client
| 2
|
Like:
skeletonTracker.StartTracking(int userId)
skeletonTracker.StopTracking(int userId)
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.615
| 0.385
| 0.3612
|
1,029
| 2,781
| 3
|
Stepan.Reuk
|
leader
| 0
|
Basically yes
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.27
| 0.73
| 0.4019
|
1,030
| 3,093
| 1
|
Lintarou0612
|
client
| 0
|
Hello admin,
I try to activate Nuitrack SDK but I get some problem like firgure below:

Untitled687×513 22.1 KB
I have tried to uninstall 2 times and install the newest version windowsx64 again but the problem still remains:
Activation error: NuitrackException: C:\Program Files\Nuitrack\nuitrack\nuitrack/data/license.json: cannot open file
However, when I install version window x86, it’s successful but this version doesn’t have skeleton tracking
Please support for me to solve this problem, I just wanna test the feature skeleton tracking
thank for your support!
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0.134
| 0.648
| 0.218
| 0.8557
|
1,030
| 3,093
| 2
|
a.bragin
|
member
| 0
|
Hi @Lintarou0612
Please try to grant read/write permissions for the C:\Program Files\Nuitrack\nuitrack\nuitrack/data/ folder.
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.696
| 0.304
| 0.5859
|
1,030
| 3,093
| 2
|
a.bragin
|
member
| 1
|
You can try to run the following command from the Windows PowerShell as Admin (Win+X):
cmd /C icacls "C:\\Program Files\\Nuitrack\\nuitrack\\nuitrack\\data" /grant %USERNAME%:F /T
or edit permissions in folder properties → Security → Edit
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.864
| 0.136
| 0.5994
|
1,030
| 3,093
| 3
|
a.bragin
|
member
| 0
|
Hi @Lintarou0612
Has your issue been solved?
| null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | 0
| 0.741
| 0.259
| 0.2732
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.