text
stringlengths 1
194
|
|---|
who were diagnosed with hypertension during the period
|
94.1 � 13.6
|
Keywords: amlodipine, valsartan, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, LDL
|
51.8 � 14.1
|
patients and patients with impaired glucose tolerance
|
short duration of therapy (12 weeks) because of which we
|
day)
|
of atorvastatin (28). However, this fact does not point
|
DOI: 10.3109/10641963.2012.746355
|
We probably are not the first group of researchers that may
|
patients with newly diagnosed essential hypertension. We observed a beneficial effect of amlodipine on the lipid profile
|
Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997; 17(6): 1114–1120.
|
baseline and after 12 weeks of antihypertensive therapy
|
agents on serum lipids. Curr Hypertens Rep 2000; 2(4):370–377.
|
J
|
Figure 1. Comparison of baseline LDL levels of patients in amlodipine and valsartan groups.
|
[20] Cheung R, Lewanczuk R, Rodger N, et al. The effect of valsartan
|
Address correspondence to Mustafa Cakar, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Gulhane School of Medicine, Tevfik Saglam St., EtlikAnkara 06018, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected]
|
counts, mean corpuscular volume, and mean platelet
|
and
|
223.2 � 38.1
|
Triglyceride (mg/dL)
|
mortality reduction, which is acheived by keeping hypertension under control. Recently, several guidelines have
|
drugs in accordance with the lipid profile.
|
REFERENCES
|
angiotensin 2 type 1 receptor, are a relatively new
|
CONCLUSION
|
use, it is important and necessary to minimize possible
|
LDL cholesterol (mg/dL)
|
.574
|
spontaneously
|
observed in levels of TG, LDL, TC, and HDL. The
|
.832
|
Baseline
|
[19] Ogihara T, Yoshinaga K. The clinical efficacy and tolerability of
|
Table 2. The serum lipid parameters of the amlodipine group at
|
.906
|
DISCUSSION
|
Anthropometric Measurements
|
amlodipine and atenolol act as immunomodulators of
|
results
|
98.1 � 9.6
|
on the concentration and oxidizability of plasma lipids. Clin Sci
|
remains controversial (10,11). Several studies report that
|
7.5 mm Hg, respectively (P < .001).
|
Abstract
|
100.0
|
using a manual mercury sphygmomanometer. Patients
|
without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972;
|
Abbreviations: BMI – body mass index; BSA – body surface area;
|
29.3 � 7.7
|
Weidmann P. Effects of angiotensin II-receptor blockade with
|
atenolol
|
Sevket Balta,3 Muharrem Akhan,2 Hakan Sarlak,2 Erol Arslan,2 Seref Demirbas,2
|
levels, but no change in HDL, TGs, very low density lipoprotein(VLDL)cholesterol,andapolipoproteinBlevelswas
|
hypertensive rats (SHR). Pharmacol Rep 2006; 58(5):711–719.
|
143.3 � 30.4
|
lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels are quite strong factors for the development of cardiovascular diseases (3).
|
height2 (kg/m2).
|
141.7 � 35.1
|
in BP lowering when comparing coadministered amlodipine and atorvastatin and amlodipine alone. In a later
|
Clinical and Experimental Hypertension
|
TG-low HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol to the incidence of
|
hypertension. Am J Cardiol 2007; 100(2):222–226.
|
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)
|
14.3 � 1.1
|
(ii)
|
From the past studies, it has been clearly known that
|
Am
|
9/12
|
are unable to assess the type of antihypertensive drug that
|
IL-6
|
of
|
Amlodipine
|
alcoholism, and smoking and those who were receiving
|
lipid profiles of newly diagnosed hypertensive patients.
|
have synergystic effects with statins. In a study by
|
hypertension. Am J Ther 2003; 10(6):409–414.
|
total of 43 patients were recruited into the study. Newly
|
Clin Exp Hypertens Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Nyu Medical Center on 10/16/14
|
Triglyceride (mg/dL)
|
30.4 � 3.8
|
whereas amlodipine brought an improvement in the lipid
|
HDL cholesterol (mg/dL)
|
.942
|
literature on this subject in newly diagnosed hypertensive
|
has been shown that dyslipidemia leads to cardiovascular
|
(n = 22)
|
decrease in levels of LDL (median LDL, before-after:
|
in 1660 patients with concomittant hypertension and dyslipidemia: the respond trial. J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 47(12):1555–1569.
|
in the morning after at least 10 hours of fasting. The
|
LDL at baseline (mg/dL)
|
Figure 2. Comparison of LDL levels of patients in valsartan and
|
.438
|
200.0
|
fact, with an additional lowering effect for TC levels.
|
84.9 � 13.6
|
effect for cholesterol and TG levels.
|
TC- and LDL-lowering effects of valsartan (13).
|
put this heading on the article. The exact mechanism of
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.