Re: Results
[{"sender": "Al seckel <aseckel@yahoo.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "Jeffrey, \n\nThe hots did the sweep. Here are the new results taken as of a minute ago. You have only one negative article left on front page of google, which is the Huffington Post article. The Huffington Post is extremely hard to move, because it is so powerful, has millions of links to it, and uploads massive new and original content it on a daily basis with posting from out side readers. We managed to push it down the page, as it used to be at the top. If we were able to post original content to both the science and the org site (absolutely not a single word to this day by Jessica, just talk), we would have been able to push it down even further, and off the page. WE did manage to get rid of the daily beast article, which is now far removed, inspite of their own efforts to keep it prominent. \n\nToxic suggested search engine terms that popped up automatically when you typed in your name are also now removed. \n\nWikipedia was an important victory, as it will always be at the top of the search engine results. ow the head lines do not mention convicted sex offender or pedophile. Instead, Philanthrophic work, Epstein Foundation, Promotion of Scientists. We have stopped the hacking on your wiki site, and that was a major effor. Your wiki entry now is pretty tame, and bad stuff has been muted, bowlerized, and pused to the bottom. Careful editing and wording has muted the effect immensely. We hacked the site to replace the mug shot and caption, and now has an entirely different photo and caption. This was a big success. \n\nWe pushed the Edge all the way up to the front page, where it was previously buried on page 5 of google search. \n\nWe have promoted the other jeffrey epsteins, and other pages are also filled with your material. \n\nAnd, while the sites are up, and in the direction we hoped, they are still new, and subject to volitility, especially if new original content is not added on a minimum of a weekly basis. I have been forbideen to add new content to the philanthrophic site as well as the science site, and therefore, as a result our rating slipped down (still on the first page, but would have liked them (and some of the articles to been able to push Huffington off page). We also helped with you images, and the first images that come of you on a google search are not of your mug shot, etc. \n\nYour daily beast foe is still at it, and trying to promote her sites against you in the same way that we try to depromote you. \n\nAs far as this site is concerned, and the continuation of this, I do not know what you wish to do. Clearly, you have no interest in my continuing. And, I am not sure if you want to continue the project at all. If the latter, and you stop, eventually it will just go into the way of entropy, and it will return to the old form. The major work has been done, but it needs to be maintained. For it to get better results, it needs to have constant input and supervision, and that means generating proper content, not just editing and grammatical fixes. Writers need to know what to write. THe philanthrophy site is at the bottom of the page precisely because you have not allowed us to add any content to it, and as a result it suffers. \n\nYou paid Mike $2500, which he applied for the purchasing of his replacement servers, but his fee of $7500 balance is now due if you want to continue. Please let me know what you want to do. I need to inform him, and if you are not going to use him, he needs to take on his other clients and devote his time there. \n\nThis needs to be contrasted with what we started with, which was a search on your name, which had nine/10 very toxic prominent stories, and toxic Wiki article and headline."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Al seckel <aseckel@yahoo.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, December 16, 2010 5:01:25 AM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "I was never told never, that there was a 10k fee per month„ you inittaly said the project would take 20.. then another 10. then another 10. ."}, {"sender": "Al seckel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "My initial estimate, given to me by Pablos, was 25, and that was based solely on his quick look at the situation, and not knowing what was really out there. In fact, as I have repeated many times, the job was far far worse that originally expected, you have a dedicated group of people trying to undo and damage you, including now, they have started up in the last week full force again, as it is obvious that they can't fux with your wiki page any more as we blocked that.. The woman from the Daily Beast. We have programs that track this stuff, and so, for the past few days, Mike has been having a cyber war with her minions, who are actively trying to undo what we are doing, as she is trying to push her Daily beast and other articles back up. So, we have to go back and push them back down. \n\nThen, there was the issue of trying to create additionally on you a positive web presence, with the science and org sites. \n\nI spend literally four months of non-stop work, creativity, and my own political capital to getyou this so far, which saved you not only time, but countless dollars, and isn't something that can be readily bought. I had people working also for free. I gained access to information that standard seo companies don't have. In addition, I wasted a lot of time talking to people who promise to help, but end up providing nothing, and so, I end up having to do it myself What do I get in return, constant back slapping to my head... \n\nWe were trying to fix up your mess. I didn't create it. Just thought it would be something to help. This was NEVER about trying to pull money out of you, and fact, we have don't everything possible to keep the costs down considerably. \n\nI must talk to you about the island thing asap. When can we do that?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Al seckel"], "timestamp": "Thu, December 16, 2010 5:20:13 AM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "over the weekend."}, {"sender": "Al seckel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "12/16/2010 1:27:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "ok. Just FYI, your detractors are on a rampage against you this past week.... Mike is trying to take care of it (NO! there is no extra charge) it comes with the territory."}]