Re: Call from New Yorker.
[{"sender": "Larry Summers <_>", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 8:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "Ok. Best to make reversible errors \nI've written note for exit strategy 1. Not going to send for few days. \nGoing to treat it all as a game till I maybe see her in Beijing and out of character ignore and look past her bad \nbehavior. \nBest to stop obsessing."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "unclear if you meant you ve written notes to yourself re exit or a note you were thinking of sending - BAD \nFORM if latter. you both have still not agreed the rules of the game. so difficult to play . you have laid out \n- this is what i want. . but actually, how it would work, and what her freedoms are. could be . yours.. are \nessential to the plan. I think much of this is your uncertainty and not hers. sorry. and yours is infectious"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 9:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "It was latter. Why bad form. Supposed to be face to face?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 9:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "this is only the first quarter of the game. if you call a time out, its on the field and done with dignity, you cant \nretreat into the locker room and send a note to the opposing side. in the next quarter she will appreciate \nwhatever you've said with respect and founded on strength. you care very much for this person. you might \nwant to demonstrate that. a note does the very opposite. . its like trump firing comey. :)"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/17/2019 1:45:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "Hmmm. \nI think sometimes written communication shows seriousness of thought but see your point"}]