FW: Daily Mail
[{"sender": "Ross Gow", "recipients": ["GMAX"], "timestamp": "Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:29:24 +0000", "subject": "Re: Daily Mail", "body": "Maz is the most devious and cunning of the bunch. However, Editors can pay for people, stories and documents. They can even pay criminals if it is in the public interest. Maz can pay who he wants for info but the Yorkshire Ripper for instance, as a convicted criminal, can't sell his story...unless in public interest cos there was say, a bent detective. Fax: Below is from PCC Code for Editors. It is not well drafted."}, {"sender": "Kevin Maxwell", "recipients": ["NY Max"], "timestamp": "Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:40:11 -0500", "subject": "Fw: Daily Mail", "body": "Please see below. My take:A) voluntary rules are meaningless in terms of arranging for a cessation of crap articles/stories etcB) doesn't offer redress (financial or in terms of publicity.Law here definitely provides more protection and redress if individual(s) involved in approaches from newspapers are employees or have any form of contractual relationship with target.Let's talk.Kevin"}, {"sender": "GMAX", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 11 2011 12:54 AM", "subject": "FW: Daily Mail", "body": ""}]