Re: Hello
[{"sender": "[aE", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 8:31 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "Gotti was an anomaly because of his personality (some agents loved him and some hated him); but I get your point. Couple of things:\n\n1. This the investigation of the President. It is only as good as public confidence in it can be (subtracting the conspiracy theorists on both sides). We just can't have someone with this kind of political bias as a lead investigator. But more importantly, he was not alone. He was just stupid enough to show it in office emails. We don't yet know what his private emails showed. Strzok, however, says that he met with McCabe - the number 2 guy in the FBI - and in his office discussed how best to stop Trump from becoming President. That just cannot be tolerated. Plus, if I find any evidence of personal or other extraneous animus in any case by any agent or prosecutor, I view it as an"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "we're on the same team. —strzok. testimony was that discussions with lovers , often include embellishments. and not indicative of non professionalism. I believe he said nothing more than it referenced \" andys office\". . paige says andy was there. how many other people were there ? were strzok and paige. off in the corner talking to each other. was mccabe on the phone? you know that taking emails alone is not meaningful. . isnt it a but much to say that prosecutors that have strong opinions . should be looked out with skepticism? who doesnt have bias. . strzok had many neg hillary opinions.. - michael cohen. michael flynn.. are not fictions created by mueller? how are you ?"}, {"sender": "Ev rotc", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "By the way, your friend dershowitz is in hog heaven. He gets on every talk show on this issue, then he writes a piece about his friends now hate him, and today the Times has a piece about him writing a piece about how his friends hate him. He might just be the Kim Kardashian of the legal scene."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/4/2018 1:40:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "One guy in the Times article on him got it about right i think.\n\nApart from the publicity hound bit, i think of him as a guy who cut and run in your case and looked out for himself. He never hesitates to respond to me by email; but when i read about something that came up in his deposition that i thought might help you and emailed him for a copy - radio silence.\n\nI guess these days he likes to make himself relevant. Oh well, we all have our strengths and weaknesses i am sure and i have many more of the latter.\n\nnicely put. !. sounds like you suffer a similar bias. :)"}]