Re: Hello
[{"sender": "David Schoen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "Just checking in to see how you are getting along these days. I hope all the litigation is well behind you and things are going well\nTake care.\nDavid"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Schoen"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 4, 2018", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "judge jeannie?"}, {"sender": "David Schoen", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 7:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "I am obsessed with prosecutorial and FBI misconduct wherever it rears it ugly head and i am committed to doing what i\ncan to fight it whether for my death penalty clients or a klansman. Lots of wrongdoing here and we all lose when the\nsystem breaks down.\nI assume you were just flipping the channels.\nHope you are doing well. I see they never miss an opportunity to try to drag you in - saw an article the other day asking\nhow you missed the #metoo press and tying you to trump. Didn't mention much of all you have been put through\nalready. I hope the cases are all behind you now. I would have liked to have helped; but i guess you and your team\ndecided on a different direction. Whatever works best."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Schoen"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 8:10 am", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "is it overblown. ? all mob prosecutors have strong feelings towards their targets. I recall many that told stories of\nhow they despised gotti etc. why is stryok different ?"}, {"sender": "David Schoen", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 8:31 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "Gotti was an anomaly because of his personality (some agents loved him and some hated him); but I get your\npoint. Couple of things:\n1. This the investigation of the President. It is only as good as public confidence in it can be (subtracting the conspiracy\ntheorists on both sides). We just can't have someone with this kind of political bias as a lead investigator. But more\nimportantly, he was not alone. He was just stupid enough to show it in office emails. We don't yet know what his private\nemails showed. Strzok, however, says that he met with McCabe - the number 2 guy in the FBI - and in his office\ndiscussed how best to stop Trump from becoming President. That just cannot be tolerated. Plus, if I find any evidence\nof personal or other extraneous animus in any case by any agent or prosecutor, I view it as an open invitation for cross\nexamination and any other exploitation possible as it cannot be an accepted part of the process.\n2. In this whole matter, I am most disturbed by the composition of the Mueller team and it seems to me that if we are to\nlearn anything from the IG's report it is the importance of having an investigation conducted above-board without\npersonal and political baggage. Mueller had a whole universe of lawyers from around the country to choose from to\nmake up his team. He purposefully chose a murderer's row of the worst. I can go one by one; but I will spare you. Here\nare a couple of examples:\nA. Andrew Weissmann was known in the EDNY as \"The Pathological Liar\" after the SNL character. He literally would\nwithhold exculpatory evidence throughout the case and then one day when defense counsel went to the bathroom or\nlunch, stick the documents under others on his table and tell the judge the lawyer had it all along. I have been brought\ninto a case in which he lied from start to finish - and now his rats have come to me to admit their role in it - to get murder\nconvictions in two cases. He has been cited by judges for his misconduct and he runined both Arthur Anderson and\nEnron through his work, all of which was rejected by the higher courts. He also is a Trump hater and Clinton\nsycophant. Mueller knows Weissmann's conduct up close and personal. He chose Weissmann for his chief counsel at\nthe FBI years ago.\nB. Jeannie Rhee, hand-picked by Mueller from Mueller's own firm, was actually Clinton's lawyer in the email\ninvestigation. Now how does that look. She also is a bully and thinks she is a real tough guy and I don't want that kind\nof character around. I also have an ineffective assistance of counsel case against her for a client in a $100 million\nearnings management fraud case in which she was way over her head.\nC. Greg Andres was another bully who replaced Weissmann in the EDNY. He withheld evidence terribly in his cases,\nregularly threatened others, and accused a defendant of putting out a contract on him when he knew it was a completely\nbogus claim, but gave him the publicity he craved. He is 100% in the pro-Clinton, anti-Trump camp. President Obama\ngave his wife a federal judgeship on the SDNY\nand on and on.\nI don't personally believe Russia affected the election at all; but I certainly am not qualified to say. I do know that we\nhave meddled in other countries' elections as a matter of policy forever. But the bottom line is, if there is to be an\ninvestigation, just play it straight up. I am friends for a long time with the IG. If they had picked him to head up the team,\nI would not be a weekly guest on Hannity tv and radio (I never would have been asked), as I know he would pick a team\nof honest folks from across the spectrum."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Schoen"], "timestamp": "On Wednesday, July 4, 2018", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "we're on the same team. strzok. testimony was that discussions with lovers , often include embellishments.\nand not indicative of non professionalism. I believe he said nothing more than it referenced\" andys\noffice\". . paige says andy was there. how many other people were there ? were strzok and paige. off in the\ncorner talking to each other. was mccabe on the phone? you know that taking emails alone is not\nmeaningful. . isnt it a but much to say that prosecutors that have strong opinions . should be looked out with\nskepticism? who doesnt have bias. . strzok had many neg hillary opinions. . - michael cohen. michael\nflynn.. are not fictions created by mueller ? how are you ?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/4/2018 1:23:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "By the way, your friend dershowitz is in hog heaven. He gets on every talk show on this issue, then he writes a\npiece about his friends now hate him, and today the Times has a piece about him writing a piece about how his\nfriends hate him. He might just be the Kim Kardashian of the legal scene."}]