Fw: THE TERRAMAR PROJECT
[{"sender": "G Maxwell", "recipients": ["J Jep [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/11/2015 1:25:56 PM", "subject": "Fw: THE TERRAMAR PROJECT", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Philip Barden", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sunday, 11 January 2015 05:27", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Saying nothing is reputational suicide. Even if. is discredited by people will know JE paid her off and believe G was complicate absent a credible denial. \nNow it is reported that G engaged in direct abuse - as I feared would happen. Next reports to the authorities will be made. \nIt is necessary from a litigation, investigatory and reputational reason to issue a cogent denial. \nI can see why JE doesn't want this as it may not suit him but he is already toast. \nPhilip"}, {"sender": "Ross", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "10 Jan 2015, at 18:42", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Had Geordie on the phone half a dozen times today. \nHe would have give us a better hearing than most I figure. \nStrongly believe saying nothing is the wrong thing - especially as Dershowitz has a big piece coming in The Times on Monday. \nRest up and speak Monday \nBest \nRoss"}, {"sender": "Philip Barden", "recipients": ["G Maxwell"], "timestamp": "Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:27:12 +0000", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All \nI am back on line now. \nI see the statement didn't go. Monday? Maybe tomorrow? \nI will speak to Jeffery Epstein's lawyer but JE has a conflict with you and will want your silence as whilst you are being attacked there is less heat on him. \nEither is lying or not. If we let her lie without challenge then the lies become the reality and that may lead to you facing investigation. These are serious allegations and In the UK prosecuting people who face allegations of sex abuse is now common place and a lot of resources are focused on this. \nWe can't sit back and let you be a conspirator by silence. \nYour are not guilty and must follow Dershowtiz line. He is a leading lawyer and he hasn't followed the don't say anything for fear of litigation. He has rightly called . bluff and shouted his innocence. \nYou have to stand up and deny the allegations or be branded guilty by association and that may lead to other investigations and worse. \nI feel I am going around in circles. \nI know what is right to do and that is to shout your innocence. \nTry and get some rest. Call me tomorrow if you want anytime. \nSpeak to Deshowitz. \nDon't allay yourself to JE as that is not the way to go. \nBest \nPhilip"}, {"sender": "G Maxwell", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "10 Jan 2015, at 16:02", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I am out of my depth to understanding defamation and other legal hazards and don't want to end up in a law suit aimed at me from anyone if I can help it. Apparently even saying is a her has hazard! I have never been in a suit criminal or civil and want it to stay that way. \nThe US lawyers for the Jane Does are filling additional discovery motions and if I speak I open my self to being part of discovery apparently. I am trying to stay out of litigation and not have to employ lawyers for years as I get lost in US legal nightmare. I stand no legal risk currently on these old charges and civil suits against Jeffrey \nWe need to consult with US lawyers on any statement I make and the complaints too \nPerhaps we make a statement of the legal risk of saying anything for potential defamation or something that prevents a full and frank detailed rebuttal + the press not being the place for that? Regardless, Philip plse call jeffrey lawyer and see what you can understand from him and pehaps craft something in conjunction with him? \nEither way I think you need to speak to him to understand my risk so you can help me understand it - too may cooks in the kitchen and I can't make good decisions. Plse reach out to him today \n+ I have already suffered such a terrible and painful loss over the last few days that I can't even see what life after press he'll even looks like - statements that don't address all just lead to more questions. .what is my relationship to clinton ? Andrew on and on. \nLet's rest till monday. I need head space"}]