RE: Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Dunlavey, Dean (©) <i", "Schecter, Danicl (CC) <>", "Viohcbbi, Ni >", "Ruemmler, Kathy (DC) < >>", "Cc: #L&W BD PR (US) <_< mailto:# >", "Wine, Jamie OY) <>", "euro, Nicole (NY) a >>", "Harris, Nicole (CH) | oo cies waa E>", "Bauer, Steve (SF-BR) <->", "M0072, Wendy (OC) a >", "Jennings, Alex (LA) < >", "Robins, Greg (LA) a"], "timestamp": "Thursday, Aug 11, 2016, 7:41 PM", "subject": "RE: Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur", "body": "OC Business Journal article with a nice shout out to Dean:\n\nhttp://www.ocbj.com/news/2016/aug/12/jury-decides-against-sjc-firm/"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["#L&W BD PR (US)", "Wine, Jamie (NY)", "Bruno, Nicole (NY)", "Harris, Nicole (CH)", "Greenberg, Jeffrey (LA-NY)", "Bauer, Steve (SF-BR)", "Moore, Wendy (OC)", "Jennings, Alex (LA)", "Robins, Greg (LA)"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur", "body": "The LA Times appears to be the first media to report on the verdict. Latham references are highlighted:\nBUSINESS\nFederal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur<http://fw.to/aXv1QHI>\n\n[Farooq Bajwa]\nFarooq Bajwa\n\nBy Andrew Khouri\n\nAugust 11, 2016\n\nA federal jury decided Thursday that one of the Middle East’s most prominent banks did not commit fraud and\nsteal technology from an Irvine firm that sued it for half a billion dollars in damages after their partnership\ncollapsed.\n\nOrange County company InfoSpan had alleged that Emirates NBD ended a partnership for a mobile payment\nsystem because it didn’t want to share revenue and stole InfoSpan’s technology to launch its own service.\nThe Dubai-based bank, in turn, denied it stole or ever used InfoSpan’s technology. It argued that it cancelled\nthe partnership because InfoSpan couldn’t produce a working product and misled it into thinking it was an\nestablished company, not one with little to no track record.\n\nAfter deliberating for a day, the jury unanimously decided that InfoSpan did not prove its case of fraud and\ntheft of trade secrets.\n\nInfoSpan had asked for $540 million in damages. An attorney for InfoSpan declined to comment on the"}]