Detailed constructive list.
[{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:35 AM", "subject": "Detailed constructive list.", "body": "Deciisions needed asap 1 phaidon. topco etc. .( cash needs) many wires needed !! 2 new trustee or not. -\nnew decantings 3 art in art partnership.??! .overdue ?!4 grats? window - 5 art space. .6 regan arts.\n.7 plane simplify re strucuture re finance. re purpose . 8 .boat restrucutre , sister, 9 re fresh estate plan. to\nconsider modifications Alex Victoria equal does not mean same. 10. tra review , sale. , 11 brh, doc\nreview, 12. sale of stock or art ? tax, rent sale 13. gifts of art. 14. charity current and future pledges\n, gifts, 15 cash flow. . 16. new IT and new personnel. 17. operational re-do ( bill pay etc). 18 debra and\nchildren ? current and future involvement . notifications etc. . new dynasty trust ? 19. tax plan and\ndislosures gaming. foreign apollo and phaidon related . 20. investments rationalize incl trading accouints .\n21. bank loans . rates ? ? terms etc. consolidate. plane boat houses. disclosures? 22 . consolidate and review\nand reduce the number of all bank accounts and legal entities. decanting liquidating etc. . 23 all outside\nconsultants? valuations etc. 24 review legal bills carefullly. 25. third party responsibilty Bens house , alex\nfilms . etc."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Lesley Groff (iii iiiii-"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:56 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Detailed constructive list.", "body": "please print two copes . re formattted so leon can go line by line ie . headings = question,\ngift answer. blank whoresponsible. timeframe. fee paid when?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:03 PM", "subject": "moving forward", "body": "I have mixed emotions about what transpired today. really, You saw first hand in nauseating detail what i\nhave been saying to you for quite a while now. _Joslins answers were totally incomprehensible. the charts he\nprepared unreadable. Brads defensive posture was at a minum very surprising . He and I have recently gotten\nalong quite well , thought. Neither Joslin or Brad understood a 180 million dollar number . no cash flow"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Detailed constructive list.", "body": "I would like to consider the gaming commmison disclosure dates. .2 we should put to bed once and for all\nadas concerns re the bronzes. . alan should opine on valuation ranges? rather than estimates. . 3. Leons input\nre gagosian purchase. ( trade in, 1031 if 17 likely transfer- . scream, phaidon. plane and boat. 4. I would like\nto review all assignment docs. decanting schedules. ( exhibits ). balance sheets for apol-2 .. loan docs re\ntransfer of narrows inside . 5. Leon should be clear regard future steps. pent etc. swaps , paydowns 6 mock-\nups of all before trigger pull."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:07 PM", "subject": "Fwd: moving forward", "body": "Thad forgotten that Alan was actually at the table when i explained my note deal to you. __it was at the end of\nthe meeting described below. . as you will recall , not once , not even a peep did alan suggest\ncontemporaneously his hand in the crafting, in fact brad said it was an idea. that HE brad, HAD HAD, from\nthe begiining . my emails between alan and I that you can read , further confirm authorship. Im sure you recall\nthe obnoxious tooting when alan said he agreed with my plan. ."}]