Re: we're calling the sales tax guy at 6:30 pm - I'll come to your office
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Richard Joslin <richard.joslin@example.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:17 AM", "subject": "agenda for tomorrrow", "body": "To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>, Melanie Spinella <\nas areflection on your voiced spirited concerns in the what have you done for me lately category ? ))::\nin the beginning . there was eileen and tom. ( eve and adam,-- however it appears, she declined to\neat the apple from the knowledge tree)"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Richard Joslin <i Brad Wechsler ie . Heather Gray", "a -"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: we're calling the sales tax guy at 6:30 pm - I'll come to your office", "body": "sorry but this is emblematic of the silliness that appears to continue. ..... 1. How can we ask for a legal\nopinion when it is crystal clear that we don't yet have accurate facts or numbers ,f. 2 Invoices have not\nbeen reviewed! corporate structure is convoluted and unexplored in detail. ( was the boat captain on the\ncall?) 3 Paul weiss is the attny , and should be charged with getting us info. . 4. Bringing in yet another\noutside lawyer without full vetting and consideration, a waste of time energy and money. .5. ex. what is\nthe location of charters shown on the invoice? do you know. .? if th invoices are incorrect, does that\ngive us any comfort in trying to defend an audit. . I saw three invoices only, and each had a different\nowner or address .."}]