[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayem"], "timestamp": "8/12/2011 2:43:12 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Importance: High \nNewsmax.com  \nLaffer: Obama Must Use Reaganomics to Save Economy The only way President Barack Obama can solve the \nnation's economic woes is to adopt \"common-sense\" Reaganomics, the policy's architect Arthur Laffer claims \nin an exclusive Newsmax interview. \nLaffer said the White House called him in the spring and asked him to speak to Obama's former Council of \nEconomic Advisors' chairman Austen Goolsbee — and he had told him exactly the same thing. \n\"Reaganomics would fix any economy that's in the doldrums,\" Laffer said. \"It's not a magic sauce, it's \ncommon sense. \n\"You've got to get rid of all federal taxes in the extreme and replace them with a low-rate flat tax on business \nnet sales, and on personal unadjusted gross income. That's number one. \n\"Number two, you have to have spending restraint. Government spending causes unemployment, it does not \ncure unemployment. \n\"Number three, you need sound money. Ben Bernanke is running the least sound monetary policy I've ever \nheard of,\" Laffer said. \n\"Number four you need regulations, but you don't need those regulations to go beyond the purpose at hand and \ncreate collateral damage. The regulatory policies are really way off here. \n\"And lastly you need free trade,\" Laffer said. \"Foreigners produce some things better than we do and we \nproduce some things better than foreigners. It would be foolish in the extreme if we didn't sell them those things \nwe produce better than they do in exchange for those things they produce better than we do.\" \nIn the interview the veteran economist said Standard & Poor's was quite right in downgrading the U.S. credit \nrating — in fact it should have done so far earlier. \nThe agency had no choice and if the other agencies, Moody's and Fitch, don't do the same they won't be doing \ntheir jobs, said Laffer, who gave his name to the Laffer Curve which demonstrates that the maximum amount of \ngovernment revenue does not come at the point of maximum taxes. \n______`If you had a company that had revenues of $21/2 million and expenses of $4 million, with no change in \nsight, $11/2 million in losses each year as far as the eye can see and it had already borrowed $10 million, what \nwould you rate that company? I surely wouldn't rate it AAA. \n\"That is the U.S. situation today,\" Laffer said. \"Taxes are about $21/2 trillion, government spending is about $4 \ntrillion and we have about $10 trillion in net national debt. I don't see that as being a AAA country. \n\"If the S&P and the others were doing their jobs correctly, they should have downgraded a long time ago.\" \nLaffer said he has no doubt the country will win its top rating back, but only when economic policies are \ncompletely turned around. He said President Barack Obama's administration's only economic plan seemed to \nbe to expand government ownership of the means of production. \n\"They have nationalized the health care industry pretty extensively. They've done that with home building as \nwell. They've tried it with the auto industry as well. So they have moved very, very deliberatively and \npurposefully toward extending the government ownership of the means of production. \n\"That to me, if you read the tealeaves, is what they are doing. It is not what they are saying they are doing, but \nthat is what they actually are doing. \n\"People don't work to pay taxes, people work to get what they can after taxes. It's that very private incentive \nthat motivates them to work. If you pay people not to work and tax them if they do work, don't be surprised if \nyou find a lot of people not working.\" \nLaffer said the current economic woes started to form under President George W. Bush but have been made \nworse by Obama's policies. \n\"There's a wedge driven between wages paid and wages received and that wedge is the tax/government \nspending wedge,\" he said. \n\"That wedge has grown dramatically in the last 4 1/2 years...under W and a Republican administration \nand...under Obama. Bipartisan ignorance has led us to this very disastrously desolate state.\" \nLaffer had high praise for the role the tea party has played in bringing the problem of the deficits to the fore. \n\"The tea party is not the problem, the tea party may well be the solution,\" he said. \"They are critical to the \nfuture of the country in a positive way. They are the only fiscally sound people I know out there all the time. \n\"I don't know that I would go as far as they go on a lot of issues but I surely respect their movement very \nmuch.\" \nAnd he said any one of the group of Republicans vying for the party's nomination for the White House would \nmake\" a great president.\" \n\"Tim Pawlenty is spectacular. Newt Gingrich knows more about issues than anyone you've ever seen. Michele \nBachmann is out-of-sight wonderful,\" he said. \n\"Rick Perry is second to no one in this stuff If you look at Herman Cain, he's phenomenal. \n\"Oh and (Jon) Huntsman was a great governor of the state of Utah and is a phenomenally experienced \nintellectual competent man. \n\"When you look at the Republican candidates, you see a group of people who are absolutely outstanding in \nattributes.\""}]