RE: request
[{"sender": "Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>", "recipients": ["Susan Edelman <sedelman@nypost.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:27 PM", "subject": "RE: request", "body": "Hi Sue,\n\nRegarding your first question: pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 50-b, our office’s practice in appellate sex\ncrimes matters is to file documents under seal. This is not particular to People v. Epstein; it is routine\nacross our appellate filings. My understanding is that it is also the Appellate Division’s (the court's)\npractice to maintain such seal.\n\nThat being said, | have discussed your second question with our attorneys. If the Post petitions the\ncourt, and the court asks the People for our positon, we will not oppose the petition for a redacted brief.\n\nThanks.\n\nDanny Frost\nDirector of Communications\nManhattan District Attorney Cy Vance, Jr.\n\n212-335-9400 // @ManhattanDA"}, {"sender": "Susan Edelman <sedelman@nypost.com>", "recipients": ["Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 6, 2018 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re: request", "body": "Hi Dan,\n\nPlease explain why the DA's office didn't file a redacted brief, but rather covered up all the facts.\nIf we filed a petition for a redacted brief, would the DA's office fight it or cooperate?\n\nThank you,\n\nSue\n\nSusan Edelman"}]