Fwd: Public work vs private AMAZING
[{"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "8/14/2012 1:05:43 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Public work vs private AMAZING", "body": ""}, {"sender": "John Connolly Ed.D.", "recipients": ["RALPH BERNSTEIN", "Morad Tahbaz"], "timestamp": "August 4, 2012 3:54:25", "subject": "FW: Public wor vs private AMAZING", "body": ""}, {"sender": "ed thompson", "recipients": ["Joseph Bernstein"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 03, 2012 6:03 PM", "subject": "Fw: Public work vs private AMAZING", "body": "There are actually two messages here. The first is very interesting, but the second is absolutely astounding - and explains a lot.\n\nA recent \"Investor's Business Daily\" article provided very interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International Health organization.\n\nPercentage of men and women who survived a cancer five years after diagnosis:\n\nU.S. 65%\n\nEngland 46%\n\nCanada 42%\n\nPercentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who received treatment within six months:\n\nU.S. 93%\n\nEngland 15%\n\nCanada 43%\n\nPercentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it within six months:\n\nU.S. 90%\n\nEngland 15%\n\nCanada 43%\n\nPercentage referred to a medical specialist who see one within one month:\n\nU.S. 77%\n\nEngland 40%\n\nCanada 43%\n\nNumber of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million people:\n\nU.S. 71\n\nEngland 14\n\nCanada 18\n\nPercentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they are in \"excellent health\":\n\nU.S. 12%\n\nEngland 2%\n\nCanada 6%\n\nAnd now for the last statistic:\nNational Health Insurance?\nU.S. NO\nEngland YES\nCanada YES\nCheck this last set of statistics!!\tThe percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked in the private \tbusiness sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet. You know what the private business sector is \ta real-life business, not a government job Here are the percentages.\nT. Roosevelt..................... \t38%\nTaft.................................. \t40%\nWilson ............................. \t52%\nHarding........................... \t49%\nCoolidge.......................... \t48%\nHoover............................ \t42%\nF. Roosevelt.................... \t50%\nTruman............................ \t50%\nEisenhower...................... \t57%\nKennedy.......................... \t30%\nJohnson........................... \t47%\nNixon............................... 53%\nFord................................ 42%\nCarter............................. 32%\nReagan............................ 56%\nGH Bush......................... 51%\nClinton ........................... 39%\nGW Bush........................ 55%\nObama..................... 8%\nThis helps to explain the incompetence of this administration:\nonly 8% of them have ever worked in private business!\nThat's right! Only eight percent---the least, by far, of the last 19 presidents! And these people are trying to tell our big corporations how to run their business?\nHow can the president of a major nation and society, the one with the most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk about business when he's never worked for one? Or about jobs when he has never really had one? And when it's the same for 92% of his senior staff and closest advisers? They've spent most of their time in academia, government and/or non-profit jobs or as \"community organizers.\" They should have been in an employment line\nPass this on because we'll NEVER see these facts in the main stream media."}]