Fwd: Re:
[{"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/7/2017 9:23:29 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": ["Martin"], "timestamp": "August 7, 2017 at 12:28:08 AM PDT", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Martin,\nJust wanted to check if you've seen the previous email.\n\nIf it's more convenient for you to discuss it by Skype, let me know. If you want to skip any of them it's not a problem."}, {"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": ["Martin"], "timestamp": "Aug 2, 2017, at 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Martin,\nThanks for the great call last week. Enjoyed it a lot. Could I ask you some follow up questions?\n\nQuestion to be answered by Martin.\n\n° What specifically did Epstein fund that allowed you to make an advancement in applying math to complicated systems, right?\n\n° Is there a paper you're about to publish? Something in peer review? That might come out in Nature or Science?\n\ne The area you work on seems to be an attractive area of science, is it hard to secure funding?\n\n° Who are the greatest critics of your ideas on evolution? (is it EO Wilson?) have things evolved since 2010?\n\n° What is it you think the public just does not understand about your work?\n\ne What is it that the media gets wrong about your work and science in general (i know of only one journalist with a degree in applied math, and most have never even taken calculus)\n\ne How has funding for your field and for you changed under Trump?\n\nQuestion\n\n° Would you be ok with the angle about how much scientist should care about where their funding comes from? It’s a hot topic given this story"}, {"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 28, 2017, at 7:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "great, will do"}]