Re: privieged
[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "lots of reporters inquiries. !. doithink that trump set me up? what do i know about his dealings? . did\ni speak to you? suggestion. all public record, house bought out of a bankruptcy proceding . I was the\nstalking horse bid.. never before was there a prosecution of erotic massage by women for money in\nsomeones home. every girl got money. returned . most interviewed by police over 21. all public\nrecord. .some concern on my team that i will get a cong subpoena. doi have to wear a tie?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:13 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "Again! Why you need a team in place! Where are you with Ollie?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:17 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "hes great. he needs to get the documents from the law firms that are wholly focused on this submission to\nthe judge. . BTW He asked for Imilllion per month . for a year. ."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:24 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "Expensive. But... In a way this new round of calls is an opportunity: reporters suddenly thinking they don’t\nknow something or that there is a new angle—now would be a good moment to hit them with a better prepared\nset of responses. Somebody, Ollie or otherwise, should get started on this."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 11:46:19 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/saudi-arabias-mohammed-bin-salman-16208376 russian oligarch\n\nsame as pb house"}]