Re: Highlight
[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "That was fun- definitely the highlight of a day that was not without other interesting moments\n\nDon't know which was better-- the wholly unexpected surprise reminder (by a prime minister) of my boyfriend from 1976( who was in high school, who lived with his doting parents), or , getting creamed on my producer's budget but then offered the opportunity to profess poetry for production funds . There may be someone as good in New York, but i'll never tell you and you really have a heck of a seminar table there . When do we do Whitman's \"Song of Myself” 1-15 Who else is reading with us? I'm ready .\n\nA few other follow ups :\n\nDavid and Brigid point out that reality tv doesn't cost anything because it is, as it sounds, very low budget . No writing , no special expertise or knowledge or research , no archival footage , no copyright clearance , no actors , no travel beyond the one location , certainly no clinton or woody allen or justice elena kagan or david brooks or Lena Dunham or even Professor New. That said , I think If were hiring the crew id do it for less -- probably 1, 250,000 all in . But I haven't won 10 Emmys and David has . That has value too. As does Wgbh . But I'll be more prepared for the next conversation and want to be much more prepared for templeton, so thank you .\n\nT really liked Michael. I would like to send him some stuff , but in googling him I noticed that we have the same birthday! May I have his email?\n\nYou are in! Yeay! Lets see what this may mean? I'll improve my numbers and you'll improve your deep reading ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 23, 2014, at 7:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "clinton woody kagan , do not add one penny to budget"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/24/2014 12:25:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "Jeffrey , if you are conceding any bit of the other things , with all due respect, that's exciting, as its new for me to be right about anything in the area of budgets .\n\nAs it happens,and as of today , there is huge dissatisfaction in public television world with the lower budget Clinton footage versus the Herbie Hancock footage. David g was there for Herbie and not for Clinton. I can see the difference .the pilot was made for 100, 000 , with savings on the Clinton but it does show"}]