Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Zubair Khan"], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 4:49 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "not so good"}, {"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 5:21:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Out of 13 states we got 11 right. The ones we got wrong are NY and WI. \nIn the last report, analyzed data was of 3 days in which Clinton got a positive spike after she got clearance from \nFBI. However Trump dominated the social media positively if we analyze one week data before starting time of \nelection, monthly data and entire data which we have gathered for months. Based on this we predicted on our \nFacebook page on 30th October that Trump will be next president of US. \nOur model works but I think the important question which we failed to answer is that how much historic data \nmust be analyzed to make the right decision. This could have been answered if we had a Data Scientist. Also I \nbelieve its a great tool to track voters and get them to vote. It can be used in French elections next year or \nelections of Brazil in 2018 but unfortunately I have to shut down this project as getting data from Twitter is \nexpensive and the start up is running out of money. \nI am going to focus on cyber security again and will definitely reach out if I have a powerful investable idea.\nRegards,\nZubair Khan"}]