Re: boosting strategy
[{"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["Tyler Shears"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Hi Tyler, \nIm at a Kinko's. \nI see that you're boosting non-website url's -- are you sure this is the right approach? (vs. boosting Jeffrey's sites?) the \n.org and foundation sites are slipping down and the USVI and science are permanently off the first page. \nThanks for you input. \nChristina"}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:33 AM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "We are pushing up the highest authority domains available for \"Jeffrey Epstein\" in general. I had reserved the \napproach of pushing non-website URLs for a few months because you expressed concern with making sure \nour URLs are on first page... but I had call w/ Mr. Epstein in the beginning of January and expressed that is a \nlimiting factor for moving Forbes/NYPost as quickly as we'd like. \nGetting up different types of results for different folks is required to dislodge the negative placements. Once \nthey are dislodged it is much easier to restore our websites back to the rankings and have our \"ideal\" first \npage. The reason for this is Google tracks click data on results and as soon as Forbes/NYPost are on second \npage they will begin a slow death (less clicks on those, more clicks on the ones we have on first page) \nFrom there we will see our properties shoot up due to the interlinking between them and the reinforcement we \ncan provide from sites like Harvard, Nat Geo, and any other publications we have influence over. Using the \n\"short-term\" links is one battle around other pages is just a part of the overall war... You saw how Google was \nchanging up much more dramatically when we had multiple Epstein's on the first page vs. having a saturated \nfirst page. \nI feel like time was lost focusing on making sure it was Mr. Epstein properties when he has giving explicit \npermission to promote any URL required to dislodge the negatives. \nI hope this makes sense.. I haven't heard from Rich on the last invoice I sent (1/29/14) and am hoping all is \nwell. Do you know if he's out of the office ?"}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["Tyler Shears"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:47 AM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Hi Tyler, \nOk thanks so much for the review. I've cc'd Jeffrey. I'll be in touch this afternoon. \nChristina Galbraith"}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith", "Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:17 PM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Thank you Christina - I tried your cell a few minutes ago and will be available on mine at your convenience. It \nis imperative we get a placement out by mid next week in order for us to hit the timeline I spoke to Mr. Epstein \nabout.. The fresh piece needs to come out while we are dislodging the current results (as you are observing \nnow). \nMr. Epstein if you have any questions on current status vs. our conversation around Jan 10. please advise - We \nare continuing to work aggressively to clean up results per our last call. I am also available to discuss this at \nyour convenience today or over weekend. \nSincerely, \nTyler Shears"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Tyler Shears", "Christina Galbraith"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 6:56 PM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "About 4,880,000 results (0.33 seconds) different computer, not good"}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:32 PM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Understand the two negatives are still present. We are still on track per our last call of 60 days from 1/10 if we \ncan get the placement out next week Christina is preparing for us and results continue to respond as they have \nbeen. \nIt takes 30 days for Google to respond in most cases and we ramped up 28 days ago with boosting alternate \nURLs per our call \nWe are working very hard to make this happen and should have Christina set up to support us with columns on \na few top sites at no cost moving forward \nI am available for a call now or this weekend to review."}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Tyler Shears"], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 8, 2014 2:07 AM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Almost finished with a batch of content as well as a press release--you'll have it over the weekend. \nAlso the PED set up a page called 'Friends' which is where they'll place jeffrey. I'll send you the URL when \ndone. \nTyler, could you check google highlighter? \nThank you, \nChristina Galbraith"}]